We debate origins of the Universe, life, Earth, humans, religion, atheism, using common sense, evolution, cosmology, geology, archaeology, and other sciences, to repel biblical creationism and other religious beliefs.

Location: Oxford University, England
Members: 4149
Latest Activity: 7 hours ago

The portrait is Charles Darwin, age 31, in 1840

We welcome comments and the opening up of new discussions in this busy group. So join us if you are not already in the group.

N.B. At the end of every discussion page is a box that you can tick if you want to be notified by e-mail about the arrival of fresh comments.

Discussion Forum

Very Ancient Sharks Teeth Found

Started by Patricia 7 hours ago. 0 Replies

Ebola Spreads to U.S.

Started by John Jubinsky. Last reply by John Jubinsky 10 hours ago. 8 Replies

Hawking Likes Film on His Life

Started by John Jubinsky. Last reply by Meri Weathers on Tuesday. 1 Reply

Mother Defends Daughter's Right to Die Choice against Vatican

Started by John Jubinsky. Last reply by Bertold Brautigan on Sunday. 36 Replies

Comet Hunters: Rosetta and its lander, Philea

Started by Joan Denoo. Last reply by Patricia on Sunday. 4 Replies

Ancient Footprints

Started by Patricia. Last reply by Patricia on Sunday. 2 Replies


Started by Rick Springfield. Last reply by Joan Denoo Nov 18. 6 Replies

Knowledge and Atheism

Started by Madhukar Kulkarni. Last reply by Jimmy McCann Nov 18. 55 Replies

Human Genome 45,000 years old reconstructed

Started by Dr. Terence Meaden. Last reply by James M. Martin Nov 1. 4 Replies

Ebola Evolution

Started by Ruth Anthony-Gardner. Last reply by Ruth Anthony-Gardner Oct 26. 5 Replies

Nose Nerve Cells Repair Man's Severed Spinal Cord

Started by John Jubinsky. Last reply by James M. Martin Oct 24. 2 Replies

A huge tragedy in our past

Started by Luara. Last reply by Tommy Tucson Oct 24. 9 Replies

Comment Wall


You need to be a member of ORIGINS: UNIVERSE, LIFE, HUMANKIND, AND DARWIN to add comments!

Comment by Louis Davout on September 30, 2009 at 2:13am
Comment by Marc Draco on September 29, 2009 at 1:08pm
In my travels, I've come across a few people who were both devout Christians and accepted Darwinian evolution as a fact. Most science (all probably) is easier to follow if you jettison the supernatural.

However, your point is well taken, and this is something that I think we should address at every possible opportunity - that the one does not follow the other. The balance has shifted fairly heavily due to the work of Richard Dawkins: who for all his brilliance seems to have become the poster child for Evolution=Atheism.

I'd really appreciate if some of you could take a look at Davison's blog and see what he's on about and if it's worth us debunking.

Davison and Marshall appear to be suffering from a delusion that they're right (albeit with conflicting ideas) and that our Darwinian ideas are wrong. The trouble with their blogs is that many people come and support their ideas - presumably adding to the delusion.
Comment by Marc Draco on September 29, 2009 at 6:01am
Anyone here familiar with John A. Davison (Ph.D)? I can't follow his reasoning and it seems nonsensical, but like the usually deluded, he's full of his own hubris (while deriding others for the same offense!).

His blog is here: and I'm wondering if he's just another crackpot to be ignored or someone worth detailed scrutiny at the Museum of Ignorance?

What really troubles me is the way that so many of these dudes equate Darwinian Evolution with atheism as if one requires the other: which it clearly doesn't. This is irritating and it's bad for the progression of proper science in America particularly where being seen as an atheist is almost as bad as being a career criminal.

I was an atheist long before I was educated in biology; and by long I mean at least a decade or over 50% of my life at the time.
Comment by Marc Draco on September 29, 2009 at 5:53am
Hey, if you haven't heard "Storm" by Tim Minchin, have a listen here:

Very rude (not for the easily offended - or faithful). Brightened my day no end.
Comment by Jared Lardo on September 27, 2009 at 9:23pm
I was talking with a conspiracy-hypothesist (they aren't theories, c'mon) who clearly has that meta-magical thinking going on. He dissed NPR--basically saying "it's what THEY want you to listen to". The pattern of the development of conspiracy hypotheses and the ignoring of basic reasoning with regard to the ideas fits one-to-one with evil. "Evil" the force--the Decepticons, the Dark Side, and so forth--not the sensation. It seemed like a terrific insight when I realized it.
Comment by Marc Draco on September 27, 2009 at 6:20am
Thanks folks. Odd how Principal becomes Law in the latin...
Comment by Mike Layfield on September 26, 2009 at 9:54pm
Ockham's Razor's_razor
Comment by Mike Layfield on September 26, 2009 at 9:52pm
"Pluralitas non est ponenda sine necessitate" translates "plurality should not be posited without necessity." William of Ockham came up with this formulation in the 14th century to counter the assumption-larded arguments of the Neo-platonists of his day. The idea is that explanations with fewer assumptions more closely approximate the truth than explanations with more assumptions. More ≠ better.
Comment by Jaume on September 26, 2009 at 7:14pm
Lex Parsimoniae
Comment by Marc Draco on September 26, 2009 at 5:26pm
Can someone translate the "Principle of Parsimony" into classical Latin, please? I can't get my head around it... (Latin that is, not the razor!)

Members (4146)


Support Atheist Nexus

Donate Today



Help Nexus When You Buy From Amazon



© 2014   Atheist Nexus. All rights reserved. Admin: Richard Haynes.

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service