ORIGINS: UNIVERSE, LIFE, HUMANKIND, AND DARWIN

Information

ORIGINS: UNIVERSE, LIFE, HUMANKIND, AND DARWIN

We debate origins of the Universe, life, Earth, humans, religion, atheism, using common sense, evolution, cosmology, geology, archaeology, and other sciences, to repel biblical creationism and other religious beliefs.

Location: Oxford University, England
Members: 4123
Latest Activity: 7 hours ago

The portrait is Charles Darwin, age 31, in 1840

We welcome comments and the opening up of new discussions in this busy group. So join us if you are not already in the group.

N.B. At the end of every discussion page is a box that you can tick if you want to be notified by e-mail about the arrival of fresh comments.

Discussion Forum

Experimental Ebola Serum May Be In Use On Americans

Started by John Jubinsky. Last reply by John Jubinsky 10 hours ago. 24 Replies

Thigh Bone on Mars?

Started by John Jubinsky. Last reply by ShroudedAtheist on Tuesday. 19 Replies

Religion the virus of society

Started by Rick Springfield. Last reply by Luara on Monday. 60 Replies

Scientific Adam and Eve

Started by Rick Springfield. Last reply by Joseph P Aug 23. 19 Replies

THE ORIGINS OF US ALL—BY DNA GENETIC ANALYSIS

Started by Dr. Terence Meaden. Last reply by TNT666 Aug 23. 43 Replies

show-off and picky intelligence

Started by Rick Springfield. Last reply by Rick Springfield Aug 20. 19 Replies

Science is God

Started by Rick Springfield. Last reply by Jonathan Tweet Aug 16. 9 Replies

Intelligent But Makes an Exception for Religion

Started by Brian Edward Croner. Last reply by Jonathan Tweet Aug 15. 67 Replies

Armored Dinosaur

Started by Patricia. Last reply by Joseph P Aug 15. 16 Replies

Rosetta Spacecraft

Started by Patricia. Last reply by Patricia Aug 9. 5 Replies

New Nazca Lines Found in Peru

Started by John Jubinsky. Last reply by Joseph P Aug 8. 2 Replies

Why Does Prince George Have Brown Eyes?

Started by John Jubinsky. Last reply by The Devian Jul 24. 8 Replies

Evolution and consciousness

Started by Rick Springfield. Last reply by Susan Stanko Jul 22. 4 Replies

If the probability of evolution is zero the sun will not shine

Started by Rick Springfield. Last reply by Dorian Moises Mattar Jul 20. 2 Replies

Comment Wall

Comment

You need to be a member of ORIGINS: UNIVERSE, LIFE, HUMANKIND, AND DARWIN to add comments!

Comment by Ogden Lafaye on December 2, 2009 at 8:29am
And then, maybe not.
Comment by Rudy V Kiist on December 2, 2009 at 7:58am
Enough of the name calling...
Comment by Marc Draco on December 2, 2009 at 5:00am
Larry isn't a troll, he just has a different opinion.
Comment by David Miller on December 1, 2009 at 9:29pm
Comment by Rudy V Kiist on December 1, 2009 at 9:06pm
I posted it on the other site, Adrian. And for the record I don't actually disagree with either of you (Ogden and Adrian) or Larry. Read what I got there.
Comment by Ogden Lafaye on December 1, 2009 at 7:50pm
Atheist Nexus does not allow religionists to post here. For the same reasons, climate/environment boards should not allow Larry Lawson types to post.

Horses to water and pearls before swine and all that.

Larry innate sense that we are all wrong from what he has experienced and learned over the years...and even though he has no related education whatsoever and seems to demonstrate a position akin to a flat-earther, Jesus worshipper etc., I really believe he has simply taken a position long ago, against authority...any authority and revels in questioning the authority of the people here. This questioning is not to learn anything but rather to disturb and distress while running out theories and slants he has developed over the years.

I am afraid Larry is a troll.
Comment by Rudy V Kiist on December 1, 2009 at 3:59pm
Holy crap you guys have been busy (^_^)...I take it John and Larry didn't watch much news this weekend? I say this because a leaked report on climate change has stated that reports were exaggerated on time lines and severity of GW. Albeit, this does not conflict with the data per say, but I find it interesting. Of course, this brings up my point. I don't argue it's not happening, I also strongly believe we need to something about pollution, emissions, etc. for many reasons besides GW. Mine's more of a fascination with the human mind and thinking. Especially the 3 hardest words for someone to say (especially a scientist) "I don't know". It could be as bad as Adrian says or it could be worse. We could end up with newly needed farmland in northern Canada, Russia, and Europe in 50-100 years....We don't know. In the meantime, let's clean up the environment.

And I want to make one more point on "realism". Adrian, I assume you make a decent living and are not suffering from hunger or disease? Well why don't you go tell the people of third world nations from your cozy home, that GW will make the death they're experiencing worse...good luck on that.
Comment by David Miller on December 1, 2009 at 3:52pm
Facinating discussion but horrible placement for it. I just started a global warming thread under science. Please everyone continue this conversation there.

Also I think that all of you participating are very intelligent people, who are also very proud. It's a combination that can easily lead to a sort of bullheaded certainty in ones words that can lead to hurt feelings from like minded people. I think that virtually everyone acted like jerks at some point in the discussion thus far and that we should let bygones be bygones. Again, let us resume this conversation where it belongs: http://www.atheistnexus.org/forum/topics/global-warming-what-do-you
Comment by Susan Stanko on December 1, 2009 at 3:33pm
I agree with Don. You give your arguments without bullying anyone.
Comment by Nate on December 1, 2009 at 3:10pm
Oceans Absorbing Carbon Dioxide More Slowly, Scientist Finds

ScienceDaily (Nov. 27, 2009) — The world's oceans are absorbing less carbon dioxide (CO2), a Yale geophysicist has found after pooling data taken over the past 50 years. With the oceans currently absorbing over 40 percent of the CO2 emitted by human activity, this could quicken the pace of climate change, according to the study, which appears in the November 25 issue of Geophysical Research Letters.

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/11/091124140957.htm

Sorry if this was mentioned before, there's a lot to wade through here.
 

Members (4123)

 
 
 

Support Atheist Nexus

Donate Today

Donate

 

Help Nexus When You Buy From Amazon

Amazon

AJY

 

© 2014   Atheist Nexus. All rights reserved. Admin: Richard Haynes.

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service