We debate origins of the Universe, life, Earth, humans, religion, atheism, using common sense, evolution, cosmology, geology, archaeology, and other sciences, to repel biblical creationism and other religious beliefs.

Location: Oxford University, England
Members: 4167
Latest Activity: 1 hour ago

The portrait is Charles Darwin, age 31, in 1840

We welcome comments and the opening up of new discussions in this busy group. So join us if you are not already in the group.

N.B. At the end of every discussion page is a box that you can tick if you want to be notified by e-mail about the arrival of fresh comments.

Discussion Forum

The Universal Love Triangle

Started by Donald L. Engel. Last reply by Jimmy McCann 1 hour ago. 104 Replies

An 11.2 billion year old star has been found with Earth-Size Planets

Started by Dr. Terence Meaden. Last reply by Jimmy McCann 2 hours ago. 1 Reply

Global warming is not man made

Started by Donald L. Engel. Last reply by Christopher Lowe yesterday. 3 Replies

Air Force Blue Book (UFO) Documents Put Online

Started by John Jubinsky. Last reply by Joseph P on Sunday. 8 Replies

Organic Material Found on Mars

Started by John Jubinsky. Last reply by Oxyaena Jan 15. 2 Replies

A Merry Newtonmas to You All on Atheist Nexus from Terry

Started by Dr. Terence Meaden. Last reply by Dr. Terence Meaden Dec 26, 2014. 6 Replies

Fossilized rod and cone cells

Started by Patricia Dec 23, 2014. 0 Replies

Pope Severely Criticizes Vatican Bureaucracy

Started by John Jubinsky. Last reply by Joseph P Dec 22, 2014. 3 Replies

The Bible is not Great by Soren Sagan

Started by Joan Denoo. Last reply by sk8eycat Dec 22, 2014. 18 Replies

Ebola Spreads to U.S.

Started by John Jubinsky. Last reply by John Jubinsky Dec 19, 2014. 10 Replies

Pope Says Animals go to Heaven

Started by John Jubinsky. Last reply by Lemual Poot Dec 17, 2014. 24 Replies

Comment Wall


You need to be a member of ORIGINS: UNIVERSE, LIFE, HUMANKIND, AND DARWIN to add comments!

Comment by Joseph P 13 hours ago

Why should your "theory" not also be subject to criticism?

And hell, for that matter, tell us what your hypothesis is.  What mechanism have you discovered, which you think is absent from the current synthesis of the theory of natural selection?  I've never seen you express an inkling of an alternative model, which you're attempting to support as a replacement to natural selection.

And no, I'm not going to wade through your incoherent blog to try to find where you've mentioned it, if you've talked about it in there.  If you can't express it here, in simple, concise language, then you're right, I'm not interested in hearing what you have to say.  All I've ever seen from you is the sort of inane attacks that I would expect from a creationist conspiracy-nut (natural selection requires the supernatural; natural selection leads to eugenics), with no alternative even hinted at.

Comment by Christopher Lowe 17 hours ago

@ Shaun Johnston Of course Darwinian theory of evolution should be criticized. Bring it on! But be specific. A vast army of biologists have amassed and reviewed data on the subject for a century and a half. You need a level of expertise to even have a debate with these scientists. 

What if you are wrong? Even misguided? I see you pissing and moaning on your blog how you've been attacked?

Why should your "theory" not also be subject to criticism? Show some comprehension of the subject and show some maturity.

Comment by Joseph P 17 hours ago

Or come up with something to say that is worth listening to.  I just took a glance at your latest blog post, and it's borderline incoherent.  I can't even figure out what you're getting at with your mountain metaphor, and I'd love to know why you have a bug up your ass about eugenics.

Comment by Shaun Johnston 17 hours ago

OK, I get it, piss off. OK.

Comment by Idaho Spud 17 hours ago

I'm not wasting my time reading anything you have written until you get Dawkins, and/or other respected evolutionary scientists to agree with you.

Comment by Joseph P 18 hours ago

I'm waiting for someone with an actual lab, running actual experiments, to turn up something, rather than you making absurd claims.  When you keep coming at us with deliberately provocative claims about natural selection being supernatural, we're just going to think you're an asshole.

This is science, not theology.  Where's your data?  Where are the peer-reviewed studies that support your wild assertions?  After your last ridiculous post, I can't even be bothered to check the latest stuff you've written, unless you're pointing us to something written by someone more credible than you.

The model of natural selection is criticized and modified all the time, when real scientists discover some detail turned up in their experiments.  When you have something similar to contribute, rather than wild speculation, I might care about what you have to say.

Comment by Shaun Johnston 18 hours ago

No, about natural selection not having the physical properties it would need to work, and the primary support for it being flawed. Do you agree that is possible, or is natural selection beyond criticism?

Comment by Joseph P yesterday

More stuff about Natural Selection being a supernatural proposal?

Comment by Shaun Johnston yesterday

I've just posted another non-creationist attack on the foundations of modern evolutionary theory, "Why natural selection doesn't work," on my blog. 

Comment by Joan Denoo on December 10, 2014 at 11:08am

The history of our world in 18 minutes

This incredible video should set religionists back on their heels and rethink their mythology. It contains a description of our world and the universe in which it resides. Beautifully told, impressively illustrated, concepts are so easy to understand that even hard-core "young Earth" creationists should stop and think. 

I love his story; even more I love his focus on his grandchild and the reason for paying attention to what this video conveys. 


Members (4167)


© 2015   Atheist Nexus. All rights reserved. Admin: Richard Haynes.

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service