ORIGINS: UNIVERSE, LIFE, HUMANKIND, AND DARWIN

Information

ORIGINS: UNIVERSE, LIFE, HUMANKIND, AND DARWIN

We debate origins of the Universe, life, Earth, humans, religion, atheism, using common sense, evolution, cosmology, geology, archaeology, and other sciences, to repel biblical creationism and other religious beliefs.

Location: Oxford University, England
Members: 4055
Latest Activity: yesterday

The portrait is Charles Darwin, age 31, in 1840

We welcome comments and the opening up of new discussions in this busy group. So join us if you are not already in the group.

N.B. At the end of every discussion page is a box that you can tick if you want to be notified by e-mail about the arrival of fresh comments.

Discussion Forum

Strange Science

Started by Sven Andersson. Last reply by Francis Kamuyu yesterday. 17 Replies

Movie - Stephen Hawking's Life with First Wife

Started by John Jubinsky. Last reply by John Jubinsky on Sunday. 2 Replies

New Way to Genetically Treat Diseases

Started by John Jubinsky. Last reply by John Jubinsky Apr 4. 5 Replies

Atheist activism

Started by Madhukar Kulkarni. Last reply by Joan Denoo Mar 27. 5 Replies

Quantum Entanglement and Faster than Light Travel

Started by John Jubinsky. Last reply by John Jubinsky Mar 24. 15 Replies

Second Law of Thermodynamics

Started by Joan Denoo. Last reply by Jim Pigeon Mar 22. 42 Replies

The "Cute" T-Rex

Started by Patricia Mar 14. 0 Replies

Scientists Say Some People Indifferent to Music

Started by John Jubinsky. Last reply by Gregory Phillip Dearth Mar 14. 5 Replies

The 'Most High' father of Yahweh

Started by Madhukar Kulkarni. Last reply by Joan Denoo Mar 5. 26 Replies

Comment Wall

Comment

You need to be a member of ORIGINS: UNIVERSE, LIFE, HUMANKIND, AND DARWIN to add comments!

Comment by Christopher Lowe on September 21, 2013 at 4:21pm

Poverty is a fact of life. What would you do about the down and out? Would you go for the "tough shit" attitude of the Tea Party based on their worship of their demi-goddess Ayn Rand? She has to be the most heartless and self centered writer in the modern era. 

There was a culture of misleading marketing combined with bundled trading that lead to the mortgage crisis. No one was brought to justice for this borderline fraud and ethical travesty. Obama was left to clean up the mess and at least he stepped up to the plate, and without relieving homeowners of their obligations, allowed relief by providing funds until their mortgages could be renegotiated. I do agree that that should not come from the taxpayers like you. The mortgage lenders who put these people in such a life ruining position should pay. And pay big time! They deserve to.

Redistribution of wealth is a red herring. With trickle down, all that happens is an effort to plug the leaks that cause that trickle. What is wrong with fostering success through job and education programs? Job creators? Give me a F'in break. These so called job creators have been doing there level best to reduce their workforces and tamp down wages for at least 4 decades. They have a lot of gall pretending their interest has anything to do with the workforce. And they have a lot of allies on the right in government. Money does indeed buy influence.

What doesn't get any traction are programs that look beyond the election cycle.

Whose policies put these people on welfare? Whose obstructionist policies keep them on there? Whose business models sap the hope out of gaining a ladder up the social scale?Whose policies prioritize funding your country's ability to bomb the rest of the world to kingdom come a thousand times over as opposed to raising the floor and filling in the cracks for the most vulnerable and at risk among you?

IMO government should be all about the fabric and safety of society. Corporations are big boys who can take care of themselves. They don't give a flying f#@k about the repercussions their business plans may have . Government,  should be in a position to prevent them from behaving badly.

I understand government has some hard choices going forward. Having said that I wonder how you reconcile saying you're socially liberal but a fiscal conservative? These viewpoints seem   to be somewhat in conflict. I empathize with your desire to meet somewhere in the middle but what I've contended all along here is the right is heavily loaded to the far right and has succeeded  in shifting the "middle" way over to their side.

I've been around the block and the world a few times, and I've found secular humanists highly involved in volunteerism, philanthropy and stewardship of the environment. I'll throw my ball in with these people rather than those who are all God and Greed and let the chips fall where they may.

 

Comment by Drew Carpenter on September 21, 2013 at 1:35pm

The left (dems) has created an entrenched welfare system that rewards recipients for adding to the welfare rolls (having more babies) rather than working to move them back into the mainstream, working class. Giving cell phones to the poor, which Obama did, is taking the welfare system too far. Giving people money to pay for mortgages, which he did, is extreme. It was supposed to be a move to help restart the housing market, and I did not object to the first year program which was a $7500.00 interest free loan paid back over 15 years for new home owners. The next year the amount was up to $8000.00 dollars and never has to be paid back. That is extremist. The money, as always, comes from the middle class, who can no longer afford it. Distribution of wealth in this country is disgraceful and we need to change that. But this is not the way. I will grant you that if the Repubs would quit blocking minimum wage increases, along with job and education programs, then we might eventually accomplish that redistribution. When Clinton was in office he was moving toward what he called workfare, and the system was changing. The dems position on this, or their way of accomplishing a redistribution of wealth, is driving too many voters to the Republican party.

Comment by Christopher Lowe on September 21, 2013 at 4:01am

Drew: "...both parties are failing the middle class by governing through extremist ideologies."

Really? Where are the extremists on the Left (Dems)? Seems to me the Right (GOP) are falling all over themselves to out extreme each other, while the Dems stand squarely in the center. Name 1 extremist policy the Dems own?

Comment by Chad Kreutzer on September 19, 2013 at 7:52am

There may be some like that, Drew, but I think you underestimate belief: especially casual belief. 

Comment by Drew Carpenter on September 19, 2013 at 12:47am

I'm sure there are a lot of moneyed people who actually believe, but I think that for many others it's just an expedience that they feel is necessary to succeed in the the business world.

Comment by Plinius on September 18, 2013 at 11:43pm

I seem to remember a lot of protestants - also in old Dutch books - who themselves made the link between capitalism and religion. They often said things like: "I'm succesfull in business because I'm a good xtian, and my succes in business proves that I'm a good xtian, or god wouldn't have blessed me." 

Comment by Dorian Moises Mattar on September 18, 2013 at 9:10pm

Yes, I grew up in Santo Domingo and Puerto Rico.

It's a nightmare.  My sisters are religious fanatics and so is my mom.  

At least now they respect me and don't bother trying to convert me.

There is all kinds of superstition.

Very sad.

Comment by Nick Sutherland on September 18, 2013 at 8:58pm

Is there anyone from the Caribbean in this group who has any insights on religion in the islands?

Comment by Joseph P on September 18, 2013 at 6:06pm

Well, Jesus could be a vindictive ass at times, too.  The money changers got on his bad side, daring to mix religion and commerce ... hey, wait a minute ...

You can support almost any position, with the Bible, if you pick and choose enough.  Neo-cons, for example, ignore all of the parables, except for the parable of the talents, because that's the only one that in any way supports capitalism.

Comment by Joan Denoo on September 18, 2013 at 5:54pm

Joseph, you could very well be correct that the idea is bullshit. However, does modern RCC or Protestant religions look and sound anything like the claims of god and jesus representing love, peace, tolerance and compassion? 

Parts of Christianity engenders ideas of “rational” theology with the evolution of capitalism. Believers claim to know god and god’s wlll. They believe they have free will and purpose and meaning as defined by god to go out to the entire world and convert others to their religions. Notions of entitlement allow them to slaughter and plunder, just as god ordered ancient believers to do in the Old Testament, and to abandon a family in order to fulfill god’s purposes in the New Testament. 

Just look around us today at those who support not only slavery, but also support  domination over those who they exploit and manipulate. Notice how Christianity spreads in places that have suffering people or people who feel left out or unable to gain dominance over others.

Focusing on the association between medieval thought with ideas of entitlements given by god, enable them to move closer to god through capitalism. Thinking in terms of production and commerce, dominance in economic, political, and social progress is due to its embrace of Christianity.

Christianity focuses on entitlements and notions of domination that gives a tactical advantage in developing commerce. The Protestant work ethic and the conventional story that religion allows these strategies, empowers them to action.

 

 

Members (4055)

 
 
 

Support Atheist Nexus

Donate Today

Donate

 

Help Nexus When You Buy From Amazon

Amazon

MJ

© 2014   Atheist Nexus. All rights reserved. Admin: Richard Haynes.

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service