We debate origins of the Universe, life, Earth, humans, religion, atheism, using common sense, evolution, cosmology, geology, archaeology, and other sciences, to repel biblical creationism and other religious beliefs.
Location: Oxford University, England
Members: 3859
Latest Activity: 17 minutes ago
Started by Joan Denoo. Last reply by J. Morr on Sunday. 2 Replies 3 Likes
Started by John Jubinsky. Last reply by John Jubinsky on Thursday. 7 Replies 5 Likes
Started by Ruth Anthony-Gardner. Last reply by leveni on Thursday. 1 Reply 1 Like
Started by John Jubinsky. Last reply by John Jubinsky May 15. 2 Replies 2 Likes
Started by ROMAN ROMACH. Last reply by Ruth Anthony-Gardner May 14. 33 Replies 0 Likes
Started by Dr. Terence Meaden. Last reply by Dr. Terence Meaden May 14. 41 Replies 9 Likes
Started by Joan Denoo. Last reply by Joan Denoo May 12. 10 Replies 3 Likes
Started by John Jubinsky. Last reply by leveni May 10. 3 Replies 4 Likes
Started by Marc Draco. Last reply by Marc Draco May 9. 31 Replies 0 Likes
Started by John Jubinsky. Last reply by Humble Pie May 9. 3 Replies 4 Likes
Started by Madhukar Kulkarni. Last reply by Chris Breman May 8. 35 Replies 2 Likes
Started by Joan Denoo. Last reply by Nana May 7. 1 Reply 1 Like
Started by Steph S.. Last reply by Nana May 7. 3 Replies 6 Likes
Started by Alan Buchanan. Last reply by Joseph P May 7. 12 Replies 4 Likes
Started by Steph S.. Last reply by Steph S. May 6. 5 Replies 2 Likes
Started by Joan Denoo. Last reply by Helen Morris May 2. 11 Replies 1 Like
Started by Joan Denoo. Last reply by Anthony Jordan May 1. 15 Replies 1 Like
Comment
Comment by Sarah Walton on April 13, 2012 at 11:38pm Chris. They can hear your thoughts, man. Adjust your tinfoil hat.
Comment by Richard ∑wald on April 13, 2012 at 11:05pm
Comment by Greg LeGore on April 13, 2012 at 10:54pm @Chris: what people say about you, and assessments of how accomplished you are - both are irrelevant to the truth, the substantiation of an idea. I've done some pretty cool stuff too, and know others who have done outrageous things...but the truth or falsehood of what we think and say is based upon the facts, not what we ourselves or anyone else thinks of us. That's why Einstein, brilliant as he was, played almost no role in the development of quantum physics or subsequent progress. You may or may not be brilliant and accomplished (and if you are, that is wonderful), but your ideas and statements gain no credibility due to your standing in the world. That's true for anyone.
Comment by Joseph P on April 13, 2012 at 7:54am Is the Christ Id Man show still on?
Well, he flat-out admitted that he's a Creationist. His statements about Evolution just demonstrate that he's learned very little beyond some Creationist straw-man.
It's like I've told the one or two religious nuts that we have in my department at work: if you want to know about Evolution, you don't learn it from some preacher who's lying about it to turn you into a fundamentalist nut. You learn it from an evolutionary biologist. I've been loaning out by copy of 'The Greatest Show on Earth'.
Chris apparently needs to learn that lesson.
Comment by Fred Trellis on April 13, 2012 at 4:37am I'm going to second what The Flying Atheist says, with one huge caveat.
"In Our Time" fails utterly when talking modern(ish) science. History of science - no problem. The cultural significance of "Waiting for Godot" - no problem. Feminist readings of Marxian geography, with particular reference to Detroit gangland culture - no problem.
I don't recall the exact episode - there was some very well spoken woman trying to discuss (light bulb filaments? Magnets (how the frack do they work?) ?. Space travel? - I forget what exactly) and it was so abysmally ill-informed, I never listened again.
It was like "In Our Time" was a series of lectures on science, presented by C. Tidman.
Comment by Richard ∑wald on April 13, 2012 at 2:43am
Comment by The Flying Atheist on April 13, 2012 at 1:54am @Fred Trellis
An interesting coincidence that you bring up the name Lamarck. Earlier today I listened to an old podcasts from 2003 of "In Our Time" from BBC Radio with Melvyn Bragg. The topic discussed with his three panelists was "Jean-Baptiste Lamarck and Natural Selection."
Podcast info here: Lamarck and Natural Selection
Podcast player: http://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/console/p005495d
For everyone: if you're not familiar with the "In Our Time" program, you should check it out. Every episode is an interesting discussion with Melvyn Bragg and three scholars. Topics vary from history, science, religion, cultural...everything...old and new. I was introduced to it last year and am in the process of listening to past years' episodes. I just finished the year 2003!! Great stuff.
Comment by Fred Trellis on April 12, 2012 at 11:32pm @tidman.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lamarckism
This is the third comment you have made which suggests you do not understand the current synthesis that is evolutionary theory. You are investing the individual with an evolutionary effect or significance the individual simply does not have individually as an individual individual. As an individual in a group - yes. As an individual on their own - no.
Comment by Joseph P on April 12, 2012 at 12:25pm
Comment by Littlejohn Dellar on April 12, 2012 at 11:47am @Kenneth Hilland
If you really want to find out what that kind of experience is like, but without quite so much associated risk, I suggest you try smoking 30x concentrated Salvia Divinorum.
The effects are very similar but last only a couple of minutes.

Chrissie Farthing Online

The Flying Atheist Online

Morty Rjbi Online

Tony Carroll Online


Steph S. Online


Posted by Debra Stevenson on May 21, 2013 at 2:37pm 0 Comments 1 Like
There is a video of the Pope's 'exorcism' caught on film. The man isn't demon possessed, there are likely no 'real' demons. He's just delusional and doesn't want to accept personal responsiblity for his own behavior for his own dysfunctional life.
Brandi Amari Williams
Posted by Debra Stevenson on May 21, 2013 at 2:28pm 2 Comments 2 Likes
There is an ad that reads ' Do you support 'traditional' marriage? Vote Now"! .
No, I don't support 'traditional' marriage because there is no such thing. I support heterosexual and same-sex couples marry each other legally , yes. 'Traditional' marriage promoters largely do not believe that heterosexual women are co-equal to their husbands. Their only purpose in 'traditional' marriage is to sexually satisfy their husbands if they can and raise children and do all…
ContinuePosted by matthew greenberg on May 21, 2013 at 12:18pm 6 Comments 1 Like
i've got no problem with everyone saying "merry christmas" on christmas day. however, they've turned it into an entire holiday season where it lasts a month or more. in those situations it should be perfectly acceptable to say "happy holidays" or call it a…
ContinuePosted by Two Cult Survivor on May 21, 2013 at 11:30am 0 Comments 0 Likes
I posted the bulk of this on another thread, but wanted to add some context separately.
I finally confronted my faith and embraced the fact of my atheism late last August, 2012. Days after I revealed my "epiphany" to a few friends who knew me from another message board, my sister died from Lou Gehrig's Disease (which pissed her off because she hated catching a disease from someone she never f---ed).
THAT was my sister, understand? She was a beautiful, life-loving, potty-mouthed…
Continue© 2013 Atheist Nexus. All rights reserved. Admin: Richard Haynes.
You need to be a member of ORIGINS: UNIVERSE, LIFE, HUMANKIND, AND DARWIN to add comments!