We debate origins of the Universe, life, Earth, humans, religion, atheism, using common sense, evolution, cosmology, geology, archaeology, and other sciences, to repel biblical creationism and other religious beliefs.

Location: Oxford University, England
Members: 4168
Latest Activity: 29 minutes ago

The portrait is Charles Darwin, age 31, in 1840

We welcome comments and the opening up of new discussions in this busy group. So join us if you are not already in the group.

N.B. At the end of every discussion page is a box that you can tick if you want to be notified by e-mail about the arrival of fresh comments.

Discussion Forum

The Universal Love Triangle

Started by Donald L. Engel. Last reply by John Jubinsky 29 minutes ago. 51 Replies

Air Force Blue Book (UFO) Documents Put Online

Started by John Jubinsky. Last reply by Joseph P yesterday. 8 Replies

Organic Material Found on Mars

Started by John Jubinsky. Last reply by Oxyaena Jan 15. 2 Replies

A Merry Newtonmas to You All on Atheist Nexus from Terry

Started by Dr. Terence Meaden. Last reply by Dr. Terence Meaden Dec 26, 2014. 6 Replies

Fossilized rod and cone cells

Started by Patricia Dec 23, 2014. 0 Replies

Pope Severely Criticizes Vatican Bureaucracy

Started by John Jubinsky. Last reply by Joseph P Dec 22, 2014. 3 Replies

The Bible is not Great by Soren Sagan

Started by Joan Denoo. Last reply by sk8eycat Dec 22, 2014. 18 Replies

Ebola Spreads to U.S.

Started by John Jubinsky. Last reply by John Jubinsky Dec 19, 2014. 10 Replies

Pope Says Animals go to Heaven

Started by John Jubinsky. Last reply by Lemual Poot Dec 17, 2014. 24 Replies

Alzheimer's Reversed in Mice

Started by John Jubinsky. Last reply by Loren Miller Dec 14, 2014. 2 Replies

Pope Says Animals go to Heaven

Started by John Jubinsky. Last reply by Plinius Dec 11, 2014. 2 Replies

42,000 Year Old Flute

Started by John Jubinsky. Last reply by Jay Stride Dec 10, 2014. 2 Replies

Comment Wall


You need to be a member of ORIGINS: UNIVERSE, LIFE, HUMANKIND, AND DARWIN to add comments!

Comment by Joseph P on September 5, 2011 at 10:35pm

No, Alecks, the usage of the @ symbol is the same as in e-mail.  Same sound and basic meaning.


I @#$%^&* hate Twitter.

Comment by Alecks Gates on September 5, 2011 at 10:24pm

1. Can you believe people were able to respond to each other on the internet before Twitter?  Has to be one of the worst social evolutions of the internet.  It's as if people couldn't figure out what the colon key was for.  Plus, it's not the same as email.  Email is some username at some domain name on the internet.

2. GNOME (the popular GUI found as default on many Linux distributions), probably KDE as well, has had a built-in screenshot utility long before Windows 7 existed.  More Atheists should learn to utilize Free Software.  Don't even get me started on software patents.

3. I'm not really looking for more Atheists, I just want people to respect my beliefs and don't want anyone's beliefs affected by the government.  Humans are not logical beings, and morals are both subjective and completely imaginary.  In order for our government to act without morals (which would be hard in itself, I know I couldn't do it), we would need a true, physically obtainable goal.  I don't think we could come up with one everyone would agree on . . . even Vulcans have emotions.

Comment by Joseph P on September 5, 2011 at 10:15pm
Same as e-mail, yes.  Honestly, it's not as necessary in my posts, since I blather enough for people to figure out what I'm referring to.  For people who are briefer in their comments, though, it helps people keep track of what the comment is in response to, in a format like this which lacks response nesting.
Comment by AtheistTech on September 5, 2011 at 10:04pm



The little @ sign is called the at sign. So it translates into "at Natalie"

Comment by Susan Stanko on September 5, 2011 at 9:46pm
The @ comes from twitter.  That is how replies are structured.
Comment by Natalie A Sera on September 5, 2011 at 9:34pm
Fil (what's that little @ sign?) I might be in the minority, but *I* can make that distinction. For example, I don't believe in hunting, because a hunter CANNOT guarantee the animal a merciful death, but I'm not out to ban hunting on the basis of MY belief. I WILL tell people about my belief, but I also acknowledge that there are differences. Point taken?
Comment by Natalie A Sera on September 5, 2011 at 8:36pm
Trekjunky, as a former schoolteacher, I couldn't agree more that we need to educate our children in how to think. But just how to do that is another issue. Philosophy, in that it is a way to learn to think, is NOT taught in the public schools. And I think the public would be up in arms if it were, except possibly if it were restricted to standard Christian philosophers, which then gets too close to religion. Our teaching of history is already WAY too topheavy with European Christian history (didn't you know that the Greeks were the beginning of mankind?), and until recently Civics (or Government, or whatever you want to call it) was also very white, Christian oriented (and in places, still is -- the Christian country believers may well have been taught that in school). I guess what I'm trying to say is that education is in drastic need of reform. And as far as raising a generation of little atheists, ain't gonna happen. I was out of line for even mentioning that our BASIC laws, such as no murder, burglary, etc. came long before the Greeks and occur in most if not all cultures.
Comment by G Smith on September 5, 2011 at 8:08pm

To encourage teen atheists in their YouTube "coming out" efforts, I seek out their coming out videos, click Like, and play their video twice.  Both views will add to their Views tally, although the counter is usually not immediately incremented.  

I think that encouraging them will give them more self-confidence, and that they will speak more openly on the subject in school.  This will hopefully filter down through the grade levels.

An example of a teen atheist "coming out" video:

Comment by AtheistTech on September 5, 2011 at 7:29pm
@Natalie We need to find a model for our public school system that will maximize the education of ALL people. That will not discriminate against the poor. We need to teach our children how to think for themselves so that they can steel themselves from bogus claims. Why wait till college. In reading many atheists' stories I noticed that they understood the fallacy of religion at an early age. Just think how many more atheists there will be if we teach our children early on?
Comment by AtheistTech on September 5, 2011 at 7:15pm

@Ezra David Rose

I agree with you. But it couldn't happen soon enough for me. Just think what theists are fighting against. 1) Education of the masses. 2) Fair chance at a good life. 3) True happiness unfeathered by guilt. 4) Self respect 5) Freedom 6) No more wars based on religion - isn't that most of the wars today - and if the masses are educated, would there be any other kinds of war?


If all this sounds unreachable, think again. The organized atheist can bring it about. Change public education and the political climate, and that will reach a new generation which the impossible may be possible.



Members (4166)


© 2015   Atheist Nexus. All rights reserved. Admin: Richard Haynes.

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service