"And now I see that Latest Activity has been restored to my profile page (and, I presume, everyone else's). Thanks for the effort, Richard."
 |
The World's Largest Coalition of Nontheists and Nontheist Communities!
What's the Mystery Find on Mars?
Scientists working on NASA's six-wheeled rover on Mars have a problem. But it's a good problem.
They have some exciting new results from one of the rover's instruments. On the one hand, they'd like to tell everybody what they found, but on the other, they have to wait because they want to make sure their results are not just some fluke or error in their instrument.
[…]
John Grotzinger, the principal investigator for the rover mission, says they recently put a soil sample in SAM, and the analysis shows something earthshaking. "This data is gonna be one for the history books. It's looking really good," he says.
My hopes are high that something of real significance has been discovered – but then, I have been disappointed more than once.
They have some exciting new results from one of the rover's instruments. On the one hand, they'd like to tell everybody what they found, but on the other, they have to wait because they want to make sure their results are not just some fluke or error in their instrument.
[…]
John Grotzinger, the principal investigator for the rover mission, says they recently put a soil sample in SAM, and the analysis shows something earthshaking. "This data is gonna be one for the history books. It's looking really good," he says.
My hopes are high that something of real significance has been discovered – but then, I have been disappointed more than once.
Tags: Mars, New_discovery, Rover
Replies to This Discussion
-
Permalink Reply by Joshua Colwell on -
My guess is that they have found some water molecules, probably as part of a clathrate.
-
-
Permalink Reply by Pat on -
I, too, heard that this morning on the news. My guess (and that, along with $0.50 will get you a cup of coffee), is that it is some organic compounds like amino acids.
-
-
Permalink Reply by Loren Miller on -
When in doubt, test it again ... then again ... then a few more times, just to be CERTAIN.
-
-
Permalink Reply by Idaho Spud on -
What I would call "earthshaking" would be something like a key to an underground city, but most likely his definition is much less tremulous than that.
However, I think it's something more satisfying than water. Haven't they already established that there is water on mars?
-
-
Permalink Reply by Joshua Colwell on
-
They've found water at the poles and evidence of past water everywhere else, but no extant water from in situ measurements in the low latitudes. I don't think it would be that exciting either. Maybe I'm just being pessimistic.
-
-
Permalink Reply by Joseph P on -
Yeah, probably something organic. I don't suppose it's actual microbial life.
Hell, organic compounds and amino acids, as Pat said, wouldn't be anything earthshaking. We've found those in meteors and such, haven't we?
-
-
Permalink Reply by Joshua Colwell on
-
Yes, amino acids would not be much for the history books unless they were in some unusual form or if they were clearly of Martian origin perhaps.
http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn17628-found-first-amino-acid-...
-
-
Permalink Reply by Joseph P on
-
Ah, yeah, that sounds like what I was thinking of. One of those smaller astral bodies, anyway.
-
-
Permalink Reply by Jim DePaulo on -
I pretty sure that it's not water or amino acids as neither would be "one for the history books". My best guess would be conclusive evidence of ancient life or even better actual living critters - that would make the history books.
-
-
Permalink Reply by Joshua Colwell on
-
You have greater faith in what the instrument P.I. determines worthy of historical note than I do. I remain a skeptic about life on Mars, past or present, and would be astonished (and delighted) if they found anything suggestive of life there.
-
-
Permalink Reply by Joseph P on
-
Well yeah, that's why we're guessing these out there but technically possible scenarios. From all the noise they're making, if they're right, it's something astonishing and delightful, to use your words. We'll see what it actually is, when we have confirmation.
-
-
Permalink Reply by Madhukar Kulkarni on -
This could be a life form more advanced than a mere single cell life. Something like an earthworm for example probably existing in large numbers. It also could be some plant life, past or present.
-
CONNECT WITH ATHEIST NEXUS
Latest Activity
- Top News
- Everything
Loren Miller commented on Ruth Anthony-Gardner's group Hang With Friends"Ooooo, an ATHEIST on NATIONAL TV??? Call out the National Guard!!! Notify FEMA!! CALL GLENN BECK!!!!!On second thought, scratch that last! [UGH!]"
Debra Stevenson commented on Ruth Anthony-Gardner's group Hang With Friends"Yes, not everyone thanks a deity for their survival and nobody should thank their god for a vicious tornado that wiped out so much of what people owned and even took lives, especially the lives of innocent children.
Brandi Amari Williams"
sk8eycat commented on Ruth Anthony-Gardner's group Hang With Friends"Tony, I love that clip! "Wolf Gets Blitzed"...tee-hee.
Did anyone read the comments below the You Tube version? they were almost all like, "Yeah, thank the lard for sending a ghastly tornado to kill more than 50…"
The Flying Atheist commented on Ruth Anthony-Gardner's group Hang With Friends"Great clip, Tony. People need to realize that not everybody superfluously and automatically thanks god in a time of crisis. Maybe he's learned a lesson and become a smarter man. "
Photos
© 2013 Atheist Nexus. All rights reserved. Admin: Richard Haynes.
