"Loren, i was thinking about you and your likely response as i was writing this post. i know your rightful indignation with the papacy and share it, albeit probably with slightly less ire.
i must say that i just freaking love your pov.…"
 |
The World's Largest Coalition of Nontheists and Nontheist Communities!
What Is The Most Misunderstood Idea Ever?
What Is The Most Misunderstood Idea Ever?
by Ed Brayton
Longtime friend of Dispatches Ron Brown asks an interesting question at his blog: What is the most misunderstood idea of all time? He offers an initial suggestion that the most misunderstood is Descartes’ famous statement cogito ergo sum, but I think his second idea is even more misunderstood:
* That evolution is driven by random chance. While genetic mutations occur at random, natural selection is the exact opposite of randomness.
* That evolutionary theory or Darwin himself ever argued for eugenics. Evolution is a theory of what is, not what ought. Further, in On The Origin of Species, Darwin specifically spoke against human eugenics.
There are so many misconceptions of what evolutionary theory means or requires that I would nominate this as the clear leader for the most misunderstood idea ever. Very few people understand what the theory of evolution is, what it entails or how it happened. How often do you hear people ask, “If we evolved from apes (or worse, monkeys), why are there still apes?” Anyone asking that question doesn’t have the first clue how evolution works, yet it is staggeringly common. There are more myths and false perceptions of evolution than any other idea I can think of.
______________________________________________________
This is from an article by Ed Brayton. Very thought provoking question. I hear people say things that require a second, even third or fourth take. You just want to reach over and hit their reset switch. You know, the one that is blinking bright red between their eyes. And hit it hard.
I agree that evolution is probably the most misunderstood, but quantam physics is a close second, if not tied with evolution.
On the social side, feminism is an idea that is completely misunderstood by most people. Also race, as in there isn’t any, except the human race.
Anyway folks, what’cha think? Anything is fair game.
Replies to This Discussion
-
Permalink Reply by Idaho Spud on -
I like the way you present that Joan.
-
-
Permalink Reply by Napoleon Bonaparte on -
People who don't accept evolution are bizarre./Les gens qui n'acceptent pas l'évolution sont bizarres.
-
-
Permalink Reply by Steph S. on -
Napoleon I agree. They are bizarre. Religion is bizarre.
Why do they believe the bible?
-
-
Permalink Reply by Joan Denoo on -
Bible believers want safety, security, and stability and are willing to sell their souls in order to have their security blanket. Believers learn from their first bible study lesson or their first sermon that they cannot live a moral life without their crutch.
-
-
Permalink Reply by Joan Denoo on
-
-
Permalink Reply by Tom Sarbeck on -
Suppose I photoshop that croc's head onto the pope.
I'll title the pic Crococrap.
-
-
Permalink Reply by Steven Rowlinson on
-
I would say that the most misunderstood idea would be 'energy'. Many people have the idea that energy is some nebulous force that surrounds us and influences us. Things like chakras, ley lines, psychic abilities; all that jazz. Most of these ridiculous claims stem from a complete lack of understanding over what energy is and its relationship with matter (i.e.; being one and the same).
Really winds me up when I hear someone talk about energy like its something you can pick up and stick in your pocket (And don't get me started on the whole 'its made of PURE ENERGY!' drivel that seems to pop up in films and TV frequently).
Oh that and quantum mechanics, definitely. I have a personal rule: if someone mentions Quantum theory, and are not a working physicist: they are talking out of their arse (this rule also applies to myself!).
-
-
Permalink Reply by Tom Sarbeck on
-
In a college philosophy class one day, as the professor spoke of Rousseau's cogito ergo sum as a kind of truth, I was thinking I can prove I am by pricking an arm with a needle.
Years later I wrote my objection in a cinquain (a form devised by Adelaide Crapsey, an American poet).
"I think
Therefore I am,"
Said the philosopher.
Bunk! He didn't feel; he only
Half was.
Am I misunderstanding Rousseau's half-truth?
-
-
Permalink Reply by Joan Denoo on
-
Tom Sarbeck, please do create a Crococrap.
-
-
Permalink Reply by Tom Sarbeck on
-
Joan, will you settle for putting a croc and the pope together and see if mating works?
-
-
Permalink Reply by Tom Sarbeck on
-
The second most misunderstood idea might be understood to have two opposite meanings.
"...While genetic mutations occur at random, natural selection is the exact opposite of randomness."
Depends on how we define "random"
1) as non-specialists do (without method or conscious decision), or
2) as statisticians do (different things equally likely to happen).
Defined as non-specialists define it, natural selection is entirely random. (Unless you're an Intelligent Design creationist)
The New Oxford American Dictionary says the word's roots include Middle English "impetuous headlong rush", and old French "great speed" and "gallop".
-
- ‹ Previous
- 1
- 2
- 3
- Next ›
CONNECT WITH ATHEIST NEXUS
Latest Activity
- Top News
- Everything
Easton Le commented on Debra Stevenson's blog post Some Wiccans and their seeking approval from Christians"I suppose in regions of the country where Christianity is a major influence in local culture working towards a level of acceptance would be in Wicca's best interest. When I visited a gem shop in the bible belt with one of my friends I learned…"
Loren Miller replied to matthew greenberg's discussion Pope Francis says even Atheists go to Heaven"Hmmm, an outreach to atheists from the pope? I wonder ... is this an attempt at engagement and maybe a dialogue ... or is it an act of desperation from an organization which may finally be recognizing that it is failing at both engagement and…"
Karim R. joined Darrel Ray's group
Recovering from Religion
Unless you were raised by atheist parents, you probably had some recovering to do when you left religion. The purpose of RR is to provide a landing place for people when they jump from religion. With local support groups throughout the US, Canada, UK, and Australia, and real-time resources accessible to everyone, RR is where to turn when faith has lost its luster.See More
Ruth Anthony-Gardner replied to Ruth Anthony-Gardner's discussion Methane, more scary than we thought in the group Eco-Logical: A Group for Environmentalists"In addition to the methane spike over Antarctica there was
Is the permafrost's integrity breaking down?
In sum, the half-life of methane in the atmosphere depends upon available hydroxyl ions to break it down. The oft cited values of methane…"
Easton Le commented on Randall Smith's blog post The Rednecks are coming, the Rednecks are coming"Hello, Randall. Did you move to the region or have you lived there your entire life? I'm just curious because even my friends in the military who weren't rednecks and grew up in the region still loved motorcycles and racing. They…"
Sentient Biped commented on Sentient Biped's group Godless in the garden"Rainy for several days now. Down into the 40s. Not much ambition.
Some of the irises look nice, anyway.
"
Sentient Biped commented on Sentient Biped's group Getting Religion"Here is a neolithic stele from around 2,500 BC in Montagnac, France. I could not find much info about the stele - here is one link.
"
© 2013 Atheist Nexus. All rights reserved. Admin: Richard Haynes.
