Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by Alice on March 25, 2012 at 7:48pm

Tell us more E H Smith?

Do you have a link to your book?

Have you had any reviews as yet?

What is your target market?

Permalink Reply by Earl H Smith on March 25, 2012 at 8:02pm

My publisher is Publish America.  Run a search for title or E H Smith at www.publishamerica.net ...

JUST-US FOR ALL is in hardcover only, about $19.99 at 65 pages (kinda high).  With this publisher

I pay for promotions/marketing.  I've just begin, and it isn't yet at Google Books, Amazon or B&N,

etc.  No, I wouldn't yet have any reviews.  I guess my target is anyone.  I don't use links...  The

book explains more, including socialism (and the social nature of many animals).  Thank you!

Permalink Reply by Alice on March 25, 2012 at 9:04pm

What's your background Earl?  A/S/L?

Permalink Reply by Alice on March 25, 2012 at 7:52pm

Earl - does your publisher have their own marketing campaign?

Permalink Reply by Orson_Zedd on March 25, 2012 at 9:29pm

Uh okay, I really hate to sound like a downer, but what's your math on this?

Permalink Reply by Dean Dazzle on March 25, 2012 at 9:54pm

I have the same question as the downer.

Permalink Reply by Earl H Smith on March 26, 2012 at 3:34am

I'm not a math-head.  Math has little to do with what we can "observe".  Math has little to do with intuition.

Math has little to do with instinct.  Math has little to do with greater theories.  ...  My background is self-

taught.  No, I'm not a PhD.  (Does this disqualify me?)

Permalink Reply by Earl H Smith on March 26, 2012 at 4:16am

Sorry; I did some digging, and I do have some math for you all...  A. Wolf-dog hybrids, canis lupus

dybowski x lycaon x dog, at 9/16 to 3/4 wolf.  12- 15 pairs.  B. Avg. 6.5 cubs per litter.  C. Mutated

Advances= 1 in 48 cubs= evolution.  D. Mutated throwbacks= 1 in 128 cubs.  E. Mut. defects= 1 in

137 cubs.  (averaged).  ...  Pure bred wolves= Mutations (unknown types)= 1 in 128.  Mother ate

such cubs!  ...  Conclusion:  Hybridization plays a roll in evolution.  (Did not experiment with other

hybrid types)

Permalink Reply by Richard ∑wald on March 26, 2012 at 7:05am

I don't think this was the kind of math that was being asked for.

This:

"I hold that it wasn't just a little Big Bang.  It was 10 billion years of accumulation of two

great masses followed by a collision and an explosion beyond all belief."

…needs math to be taken seriously.

Permalink Reply by Richard ∑wald on March 26, 2012 at 7:09am

"My theory is Universal Evolution."

Well, it isn't science, or scientific theory by any stretch of the imagination. I also wonder if there is any basic understanding of cosmology, physics, biology, geology, at all involved. It even sounds more like uneducated speculation than hypothesis. Theory? …no way.

"Math has little to do with what we can "observe"

Sorry… observing and measuring are almost always the same thing, …in science. No math, no science.

Permalink Reply by Earl H Smith on March 26, 2012 at 9:48am

LOL     In 65 years I've experienced all kinds of blatant snobbery.  I think I'll leave this "group".

Bye.  E H Smith

Permalink Reply by Dean Dazzle on March 26, 2012 at 9:56am

You can also stay and defend your book, mate. If not... http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_jWkmcNTRKFc/SwbEYnTQe8I/AAAAAAAAB8w/sR3UT...

• ‹ Previous
• 1
• 2
• Next ›
• Page