Solipsism is a philosophical term involving a narcissistic perspective about the non-existence of aspects outside of one’s own head. No other minds exist except for the one perceiving her/his particular reality. The developmental characteristics of infants incur a solipsist view of life; it is them, and them alone reeling through the valleys of the unknown—looking for meaning and connectivity amid their own realm. However, as infants obtain maturation through developmental phases of adolescents, etc., solipsism is no longer applicable; the belief that other children, teenagers, etc. share an intrinsic experience becomes actualized.
To implement the religiosity of the status quo, even as adults, the solipsist perspective becomes volatile with an intolerable thirst for missionary conviction. The belief that only their god exists (or even exist at all), or the authoritative proclamation that gays are an abomination (theologically motivated) to society is solipsism carried over into adulthood. By what merit does one proclaim the morality of the day; is it innate through some moral genetic DNA strand; or is it merely justifications through ancient writings concocted by people like us?
To be ethical is to transcend societal morality; an agreed upon status quo amid the oligarchy. Solipsism…the lack of maturation of an adult mind strapped in the girdle of theological infantilization; it’s all about me.
Tags:
Permalink Reply by Tom Sarbeck on October 11, 2011 at 12:20am Might 'solipsism' describe philosophically what 'sociopathy' (now a personality disorder) describes psychologically?
Permalink Reply by Ashleigh Carter on October 11, 2011 at 12:50am I'd agree with this.
Permalink Reply by Robert Affinis on October 14, 2011 at 3:14pm
Permalink Reply by John Cantor on October 19, 2011 at 8:13am
Permalink Reply by Maruli Marulaki on October 11, 2011 at 12:35am
Permalink Reply by Robert Affinis on October 14, 2011 at 3:15pm
Permalink Reply by Tom Sarbeck on October 15, 2011 at 1:45am Having cared for two newly born siblings during my teens, it makes sense that young children see caregivers as utilities, or servants.
I was about fifty when I heard children's nay-saying described as a process of individuation that starts when they are 18 months old. I recall it's being said that until individuation, children don't distinguish themselves from their caregivers.
Unless the thinking about individuation has changed, kids' seeing their caregivers as utilities or servants would seem to begin after individuation, and begin to end when they have to start obeying their parents or be punished.
In Catholic schools, having say zillions of times the words "Lord, I am not worthy...." ended any narcissistic delusions of grandeur I had. I took years to regain those delusions.
Permalink Reply by Robert Affinis on October 16, 2011 at 9:08pm
Permalink Reply by Tom Sarbeck on October 17, 2011 at 12:09am So true. Nuns again and again saying "Error has no rights" helped shift the narcissism in the direction you point out.
Permalink Reply by Jim DePaulo on October 14, 2011 at 4:55pm
Permalink Reply by Robert Affinis on October 16, 2011 at 9:05pm
Tom Sarbeck replied to Ruth Anthony-Gardner's discussion Top industries all depend on externalities in the group Politics, Economics, and Religion
Edison Sullivan replied to James M. Martin's discussion Just Because You Are Not a Believer Doesn't Mean They Don't Pray For You
Debra Stevenson commented on Debra Stevenson's blog post Salvation Army and religious charities discriminating
Debra Stevenson replied to James M. Martin's discussion Republican Candidate Trent Franks and Tony Perkins Compare Repeal of "Roe v. Wade" to End of Slavery
Loren Miller replied to James M. Martin's discussion Just Because You Are Not a Believer Doesn't Mean They Don't Pray For You
Edison Sullivan liked James M. Martin's discussion Just Because You Are Not a Believer Doesn't Mean They Don't Pray For You© 2013 Atheist Nexus. All rights reserved. Admin: Richard Haynes.

