Atheist Nexus

The World’s Largest Coalition of Nontheists and Nontheist Communities!

Aberingi's long-running topic entitled "Do we need a Universal Atheist Symbol?" leads me to ask "Do we need a Universal Atheist Motto?".

Well, perhaps we don't, or perhaps we could, but some theists might get deservedly irritated if we chose to use something like "In Darwin we trust" at appropriate moments.
These words, suitably translated into other languages, have a basic international atheist appeal with respect to truth and helpful anti-theist sabre-rattling and debating.
e.g. they might look good on the side of a bus/ coach.

Tags: Darwin, bus slogan

Views: 177

Replies to This Discussion

"Gesundheit". It's German, means "health", and isn't so unusual a word in English, either. What has sneezing to do with god in the first place??
What about "IN GOD WE DON'T TRUST"
This is a negative perspective. I prefer the positive approach.
In REASON We Trust.

How you like them apples?
On first glance this sounds good and then I remember all the nice, gracious, loving, caring, dependable, resourceful, intelligent, compassionate people who believe the strangest things. I also have a son who just makes no sense to me. He tries to tell me how he arrives at his conclusions and there is just no rhyme nor reason to his logic.
Perfect! I love it.
I would prefer "In Science and Reason we trust." Science for the facts of existence and Reason for the morals and ethics of living.
At first sight this looks good.
However, the word 'reason' also gets used by theocratic philosophers to support their own beliefs.
So slightly better is "In scientific reason we trust".

And yet, the verb 'trust' can be a loaded word because it can be worked either way depending on the writer. [e.g. the god-botherers 'trust' their faith---which we know has no proof---whereas science is to be trusted because millions of scientists have performed billions of experiments that all support one other and can be repeatedly tested.] What alternative might there be to 'trust' ?

So, perhaps, "In science, we reason"
or something similar can be considered..
and Reason for the morals and ethics of living.

I can see that you mean well but the word reason alone does not connote morality (Hitler and Stalin believed in reason too.) Reason will take one to different conclusions according to the hypotheses that it is founded in. In order to not have the church scapegoat us as a bunch of Hitlers and Stalins I would like to see one word added to your motto so that it reads: In Dignity, Science and Reason We Trust.

Hey Loren, how about we surreptitously gain acceptance by ostensibly (and yes, in reality, too!!) showing how we regularly follow the path of integrity and 'righteousness,' before the hopelessly misguided have a second to describe us erroneously?  In other words (IOW)

 

What's wrong with usurping the golden rule?

 

After all, it is the essence of morality; presented in one simple sentence that even a devout ____  (xtian or fill in the blank) could easily grasp.

Ultimately, the atheist challenge is to illuminate the unenlightened (yes that is deliberate irony!) that we atheist DO have decent morals, for real.

 

Nicht war?

Joan, i feel the same way.  Thus i vociferously espouse the golden rule.  Xtians do not have the copyright on it.

 

- jillian =)

I'm in agreement on a positive approach

RSS

Support Nexus

Click to Buy Amazon items and help A|N

Advertisements

Heathen's Guide

Your Ad Here

Helpful Items

 

Search Atheist Nexus:
Translate page:
 
Social Networking Links:
 

Latest Activity

Greg replied to Alexandra's discussion Need help with irreducible complexity
5 minutes ago
Joan Denoo commented on Debra Stevenson's blog post Anti-atheist post from an Orthdox Mormon
7 minutes ago
Christy Stewart posted a blog post
12 minutes ago
Greg replied to Alexandra's discussion Need help with irreducible complexity
12 minutes ago
Jeffrey S. Rogers commented on Steph S.'s group Geek & Nerd Haven
23 minutes ago
Emerald Dove replied to John Hutcheson's discussion Everybody Draw Mohammad Day, Who's playing?
27 minutes ago
Joseph P replied to Ruth Anthony-Gardner's discussion Making miscarriage a crime in the group Feminist Atheists
27 minutes ago
Joan Denoo replied to James M. Martin's discussion Breitbart Group Claims "New Evidence" Hitler Was Gay in the group LGBTQI Nexus / Gay Atheists
27 minutes ago
Joseph P commented on Steph S.'s group Geek & Nerd Haven
30 minutes ago
Dr. Allan H. Clark replied to Joan Denoo's discussion Quantifying the consensus on anthropogenic global warming in the scientific literature in the group Climate Concerns
38 minutes ago
Emerald Dove posted a photo
41 minutes ago
Loren Miller commented on Debra Stevenson's blog post Anti-atheist post from an Orthdox Mormon
41 minutes ago
James M. Martin replied to James M. Martin's discussion Breitbart Group Claims "New Evidence" Hitler Was Gay in the group LGBTQI Nexus / Gay Atheists
1 hour ago
Debra Stevenson posted blog posts
1 hour ago
Joan Denoo replied to Ruth Anthony-Gardner's discussion Game-changing solar energy breakthrough claimed in the group Climate Concerns
1 hour ago
Joan Denoo shared their discussion on Twitter
1 hour ago
Joan Denoo added a discussion to the group Climate Concerns
1 hour ago
Ruth Anthony-Gardner replied to Ruth Anthony-Gardner's discussion Countries at most risk from Climate Change in the group Eco-Logical: A Group for Environmentalists
1 hour ago
Joan Denoo liked Steph S.'s discussion Why Warming Oceans Could Mean Dwindling Fish
1 hour ago
Joan Denoo replied to Steph S.'s discussion Why Warming Oceans Could Mean Dwindling Fish in the group Climate Concerns
1 hour ago

© 2013   Atheist Nexus. All rights reserved. Admin: Brother Richard.

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service