Atheist Nexus

The World’s Largest Coalition of Nontheists and Nontheist Communities!

Aberingi's long-running topic entitled "Do we need a Universal Atheist Symbol?" leads me to ask "Do we need a Universal Atheist Motto?".

Well, perhaps we don't, or perhaps we could, but some theists might get deservedly irritated if we chose to use something like "In Darwin we trust" at appropriate moments.
These words, suitably translated into other languages, have a basic international atheist appeal with respect to truth and helpful anti-theist sabre-rattling and debating.
e.g. they might look good on the side of a bus/ coach.

Tags: Darwin, bus slogan

Views: 177

Replies to This Discussion

"Gesundheit". It's German, means "health", and isn't so unusual a word in English, either. What has sneezing to do with god in the first place??
What about "IN GOD WE DON'T TRUST"
This is a negative perspective. I prefer the positive approach.
In REASON We Trust.

How you like them apples?
On first glance this sounds good and then I remember all the nice, gracious, loving, caring, dependable, resourceful, intelligent, compassionate people who believe the strangest things. I also have a son who just makes no sense to me. He tries to tell me how he arrives at his conclusions and there is just no rhyme nor reason to his logic.
Perfect! I love it.
I would prefer "In Science and Reason we trust." Science for the facts of existence and Reason for the morals and ethics of living.
At first sight this looks good.
However, the word 'reason' also gets used by theocratic philosophers to support their own beliefs.
So slightly better is "In scientific reason we trust".

And yet, the verb 'trust' can be a loaded word because it can be worked either way depending on the writer. [e.g. the god-botherers 'trust' their faith---which we know has no proof---whereas science is to be trusted because millions of scientists have performed billions of experiments that all support one other and can be repeatedly tested.] What alternative might there be to 'trust' ?

So, perhaps, "In science, we reason"
or something similar can be considered..
and Reason for the morals and ethics of living.

I can see that you mean well but the word reason alone does not connote morality (Hitler and Stalin believed in reason too.) Reason will take one to different conclusions according to the hypotheses that it is founded in. In order to not have the church scapegoat us as a bunch of Hitlers and Stalins I would like to see one word added to your motto so that it reads: In Dignity, Science and Reason We Trust.

Hey Loren, how about we surreptitously gain acceptance by ostensibly (and yes, in reality, too!!) showing how we regularly follow the path of integrity and 'righteousness,' before the hopelessly misguided have a second to describe us erroneously?  In other words (IOW)

 

What's wrong with usurping the golden rule?

 

After all, it is the essence of morality; presented in one simple sentence that even a devout ____  (xtian or fill in the blank) could easily grasp.

Ultimately, the atheist challenge is to illuminate the unenlightened (yes that is deliberate irony!) that we atheist DO have decent morals, for real.

 

Nicht war?

Joan, i feel the same way.  Thus i vociferously espouse the golden rule.  Xtians do not have the copyright on it.

 

- jillian =)

I'm in agreement on a positive approach

RSS

Support Nexus

Click to Buy Amazon items and help A|N

Advertisements

Heathen's Guide

Your Ad Here

Helpful Items

 

Search Atheist Nexus:
Translate page:
 
Social Networking Links:
 

Latest Activity

Steph S. commented on Ruth Anthony-Gardner's group Hang With Friends
5 minutes ago
Steph S. added 2 discussions to the group Wildlife
44 minutes ago
Steph S. added 2 discussions to the group Geek & Nerd Haven
53 minutes ago
Steph S. added 2 discussions to the group Health & Fitness
58 minutes ago
Dr. Allan H. Clark replied to Dr. Allan H. Clark's discussion Unforessen consequence of Obamacare
1 hour ago
Steph S. replied to Dr. Allan H. Clark's discussion Unforessen consequence of Obamacare
1 hour ago
Steph S. liked Dr. Allan H. Clark's discussion Unforessen consequence of Obamacare
1 hour ago
Steph S. replied to Ruth Anthony-Gardner's discussion 11 year old climate activist Xiuhtezcatl Martinez in the group Climate Concerns
1 hour ago
Steph S. liked Ruth Anthony-Gardner's discussion 11 year old climate activist Xiuhtezcatl Martinez
1 hour ago
Steven Craig replied to Steve's discussion networking in the group Ohio Atheists
1 hour ago
Steph S. commented on Loren Miller's status
1 hour ago
Dr. Allan H. Clark replied to Dr. Allan H. Clark's discussion Unforessen consequence of Obamacare
2 hours ago
Mr Peterdactyl commented on Talgin's photo
2 hours ago
booklover commented on Ruth Anthony-Gardner's group Hang With Friends
2 hours ago
booklover commented on Ruth Anthony-Gardner's group Hang With Friends
2 hours ago
Idaho Spud liked Joan Denoo's discussion Baloney Detection Kit, (Dr. Michael Shermer)
3 hours ago
Idaho Spud commented on Sentient Biped's group Godless in the garden
3 hours ago
Idaho Spud commented on Sentient Biped's group Godless in the garden
3 hours ago
Loren Miller replied to John Hutcheson's discussion Everybody Draw Mohammad Day, Who's playing?
3 hours ago
Debra Stevenson replied to James M. Martin's discussion Breitbart Group Claims "New Evidence" Hitler Was Gay in the group LGBTQI Nexus / Gay Atheists
4 hours ago

© 2013   Atheist Nexus. All rights reserved. Admin: Brother Richard.

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service