Tags:
Permalink Reply by Hidden in the crowd. on January 11, 2011 at 2:54am
Permalink Reply by Park Bierbower on January 11, 2011 at 3:44am The problem lies with the perception that matter is something that we look at and that what we are looking at has always existed in its present form, or that it was created in its present form, and that it will always exist in its present form, none of which is correct. (The same can be said for time, but that is beyond the scope of this answer.)
What we perceive is temporary, and though it is extremely old from our perspecitve, it is not eternal, it is not really "solid", it is energy.
There are a lot of things about matter that we assume that is false, we continually learn more about it and the universe and the more we know the more we know that there is no need for God to be involved and certainly no "personal" god.
Permalink Reply by Marc Draco on January 11, 2011 at 4:58am All matter was created shortly after Big Bang. The best theory we have is that masses of sub-atomic particles were created and then annihilated and a very small number remained which went on to create what we see today.
Some of the weirder things about this unique (we think) incident is that immediately after the event the universe was expanding at a rate above light speed. Impossible? Not really, because light exists IN the universe those rules had not yet been created.
Google for Planck Time (tP) and you'll find lots of stuff on this event - tP is such a fine grained measure that it's used to describe the moments immediately after Big Bang while the universe was no bigger than a football.
Getting your head around this isn't easy: it's far easier to believe in a god - which is why so many do.
Permalink Reply by Park Bierbower on January 11, 2011 at 5:08am
Permalink Reply by The Secular One on January 11, 2011 at 2:36pm
Permalink Reply by Smitty on January 11, 2011 at 12:01pm
Permalink Reply by Susan Stanko on January 11, 2011 at 12:56pm
Permalink Reply by Park Bierbower on January 11, 2011 at 1:08pm its called "special pleading"
also consider that if their god doesn't need a creator, then why does the universe?
I would say that considering that the human brain isn't built to handle numbers larger than ten thousand (try imagining ten thousand one dollar bills~ you can't) that trying to posit something as enormous as the universe is, in principle, silly. Mathematics helps us out, but again, the understanding is on a fundamentally different scale. Religion has no mathematical rendering or help, and neither do their ideas (unless you count adding up the ages to calculate the age of the earth). Imo we as a species aren't developed enough to truly, on a fundamental level, understand the way the universe was created outside of newtonian physics. Kinda like a toddler understanding the workings of a car. they can be taught the terms, and possibly understand what happens if something were to break, or even how to operate it~ but at the end of the day, they aren't ready or able to comprehend the physics at work and the intricacies in play.
Permalink Reply by Susan Stanko on January 11, 2011 at 1:21pm also consider that if their god doesn't need a creator, then why does the universe?
Yeah, this was what I was getting at.
Permalink Reply by Stephan Vladimir Bugaj on January 12, 2011 at 12:38pm Precisely.
And additionally, the reasoning that basically states "I don't understand how that works, so it must be magical" is also flawed. It is quite a jump to a conclusion to state that complete ignorance ("I don't know at all") leads to a definitive conclusion ("God did it").
Permalink Reply by Geraldo Cienmarcos on January 11, 2011 at 2:08pm
No,
That's what is hard to grasp in our "natural" world of cause and effect on earth.
Matter is infinate. No need for a beginning. "It" always was and always will be. Sounds like an old Hindu spiritual teaching doesn't it?
Gary
J. Morr replied to Joan Denoo's discussion Cox, Brian + In Search of Giants (in 15 parts) by Joan Denoo in the group ORIGINS: UNIVERSE, LIFE, HUMANKIND, AND DARWIN
J. Morr liked Joan Denoo's discussion Cox, Brian + In Search of Giants (in 15 parts) by Joan Denoo
Loren Miller replied to Debra Stevenson's discussion Humanistic Mormon Bishop's response to Elder's homophobic remark at GC
Kris Leeds commented on Rachel Riley's blog post RAGE! (What I want to say but won't on FB)
Philip Jarrett replied to Anthony Jordan's discussion Poll Shows 29% of Americans Believe Armed Revolution May Become Necessary
Tom Sarbeck replied to Steph S.'s discussion 'Crazy ants' a threat in southern U.S. in the group Hang With Friends
Joan Denoo liked Dallas the Phallus's discussion Tamar Gendler: An Introduction to the Philosophy of Politics and Economics© 2013 Atheist Nexus. All rights reserved. Admin: Brother Richard.