False Beliefs Persist, Even After Instant Online Corrections
It seems like a great idea: Provide instant corrections to web-surfers when they run across obviously false information on the Internet.
But a new study suggests that this type of tool may not be a panacea for dispelling inaccurate beliefs, particularly among people who already want to believe the falsehood.
"Real-time corrections do have some positive effect, but it is mostly with people who were predisposed to reject the false claim anyway,"...
"The problem with trying to correct false information is that some people want to believe it, and simply telling them it is false won't convince them."
... for those who opposed EHRs, the effect of the immediate correction was essentially the same as if they had received no correction at all," Garrett said.
The reason appears to be that opponents of EHRs discounted the credibility of the source of the correction, Garrett said. On the other hand, the more favorably an individual felt about EHRs, the more credible the correction was perceived to be. [emphasis mine]
It all comes down to "I want to believe!" Tell people a lie they like and it's fact-proof.
Tags: error correction, fact
Permalink Reply by Joseph P on January 25, 2013 at 1:51pm Seems obvious to me.
For people with a conspiracy-theory mindset, such as that of most Creationists, providing them with the actual facts will just entrench their position further. The only possible way it can help is if you have someone who truly didn't know the current state of scientific knowledge. There are Creationists out there who think that we've only got 2 or 3 fossils of early human ancestors, all of which are hoaxes, because that's what their preachers and apologists like Kent Hovind have told them. If you can get those sort out of their shell and get them to look at the evidence, you might be able to reach them, but a simple correction probably won't do it.
Philip Jarrett replied to Anthony Jordan's discussion Poll Shows 29% of Americans Believe Armed Revolution May Become Necessary
Tom Sarbeck replied to Steph S.'s discussion 'Crazy ants' a threat in southern U.S. in the group Hang With Friends
Joan Denoo liked Dallas the Phallus's discussion Tamar Gendler: An Introduction to the Philosophy of Politics and Economics
Tom Sarbeck replied to Dallas the Phallus's discussion Tamar Gendler: An Introduction to the Philosophy of Politics and Economics in the group Politics, Economics, and Religion
Debra Stevenson replied to Debra Stevenson's discussion HM Facebook pagw argument from a LDS© 2013 Atheist Nexus. All rights reserved. Admin: Brother Richard.