Picture yourself spending some time with congenial friends, sharing your lives and pictures from your cell phones." They're curious about that cool game, song, movie, camping trip, art show, or other event that fascinated you. You talk about all kinds of stuff, poetry, styles, personal achievements, relationships, and bad days. You can share your inner child, and laugh together. They sympathetically listen to your feelings about serious topics like politics or climate change, even when they don't agree.
Personal validation comes from paying attention to one another, giving more than you get. Everyone respects you and themselves, despite our amazing range of personal tastes and interests. They'll tell you they don't agree with an idea or behavior without implying you're a bad person or somehow deficient. It's an "I'm OK, You're OK" kind of fellowship, where nobody tries to make himself look better by picking on somebody else.
Nobody here is into mind games. A discussion started with a loaded guilt-throwing question will be deleted.
This group is not intended to compete with other groups on topics they cover but to "fill in the cracks." Whenever a discussion dwells at length on a topic for which there's an existing group, we urge you to provide members a link to that group to continue along their tangent.
A comment is a shout-out, which will get lost in a few days, because the comment wall is just a random stack.
Please start a discussion to share stories, photos, and videos. Replies will pop up in your "latest activity" and a conversation can develop from the feelings and thoughts you contributed. Groups are built on discussions.
Started by Brent Feeney. Last reply by Debra Stevenson yesterday. 12 Replies 1 Like
So, I guess most of you here know that my dad died back in January of complications of Parkinson's disease. There have been times that have been rough since then, but I'd think it's all part of the process, so to speak.Today was Remembrance Sunday…Continue
Started by Ruth Anthony-Gardner. Last reply by booklover on Sunday. 7 Replies 1 Like
I'm in no rush.Continue
Started by Patricia. Last reply by Ruth Anthony-Gardner on Sunday. 3 Replies 2 Likes
June 14, 2013 2:39 pmGallery: Pod of orcas spotted in Vancouver’s Burrard InletBy Christine TamGlobal NewsA pod of killer whales popped into…Continue
Started by Patricia. Last reply by Steph S. Jun 12. 20 Replies 3 Likes
The exterior renos were finished less than an hour ago....Old & new back doors....…Continue
Started by Joan Denoo. Last reply by James M. Martin Jun 10. 1 Reply 0 Likes
No Description
Comment
Comment by sk8eycat on April 13, 2013 at 1:13pm Oh! I'm laughing at Snack Cat and Argument Cat! Thank you both!
To Chris and Joseph...Dr. Liz said that Prednizone might help reduce some of the swelling because the tumor is pushing his esophagus and trachea to the side, and eventually he'll have difficulty swallowing. We're trying to delay that. I did not ask her "how long?" when we were in the clinic...I don't think I want to know just yet.
And, yes, it's "people Prednizone." (A very tiny dose, 0.01ml once a day) Most all meds that vets use on mammals are the same stuff we use. This is nasty, but all pharmaceutical companies test new drugs on animals before they ever test them on humans. The ironic thing is that the one family of drugs that helps so many humans (myself included) is useless or lethal for dogs and cats...simple pain meds. Especially aspirin.
In the meantime, I'm going to be sans computer till the 26th. I'll try to check in with you all before I leave tomorrow. (Sue is picking me up around 6 or 7 PM, and we're having dinner at a little hole-in-the-wall that serves the most dee-lishus barbecued pork chow fun I've ever tasted. I NEED a treat!)
I've been thinking about buying some alphabet pasta ever since I saw that black cat...tee-hee! That really is such a great remark to use on the doorbell ringers.
Comment by Idaho Spud on April 13, 2013 at 11:54am Melinda, I love the look on Snack Cat's face.
Argument Cat is funny FA.
Comment by The Flying Atheist on April 13, 2013 at 10:58am
Comment by booklover on April 13, 2013 at 9:04am
Comment by booklover on April 13, 2013 at 9:03am Grinning Cat, I am so impressed that you can use Photoshop! I am SO not computer-literate.
Ian, I am like you. I can understand basically what people teach me about science, but I forget the numbers almost immediately, and could not explain it to anyone else. I swear I don't have a math-gene in my body!
Ruth, Dale doesn't like to be touched except on his head! He likes you to kiss the top of his head or scratch under his chin, etc. Odd guy Dale! lol.
Good Weekend to everyone! :)
Comment by Joseph Corder on April 13, 2013 at 8:27am So sorry to here about Jerry. Prednisone? Is it like prednisone for humans? My mother has taken prednisone for low blood platelets. I hate to see any kind of suffering! Take care and give Jerry a rub nose for me!
Comment by Idaho Spud on April 13, 2013 at 7:26am G-Cat, thanks for the Logical Fallacy website. I try to read about fallacies often so I can avoid making them in my arguments.
It would also be a good thing if I could remember their names, but that's tough.
However, I'm always pleased to see that I recognize a lot of the fallacies and don't make them myself, even though I can't give them a name.
In Ex-Adventists, Jen Phoenix shares an "awesome" website listing and explaining logical fallacies: http://www.logicalfallacies.info/
It turns out arguments for belief in God are well represented in the examples! There's also a bad argument or two for nonbelief -- but we shouldn't forget the "fallacist's fallacy": an unsound argument might have a conclusion that's true for other reasons. An example would be figuring that 16/64 = 16/64 = 1/4.
The page on Appeal to Consequences has a revealing slip that made me smile:
Both of these arguments are fallacious because ... all they do is appeal to the consequences of belief in God.... Neither argument, though, provides any evidence for Santa's existence.
And some pure silliness that exemplifies the "post hoc" fallacy:
(1) Most people who are read the last rites die shortly afterwards.
Therefore:
(2) Priests are going around killing people with magic words!
"Give peas a chance" -- I love it, Ruth!
Joan, I'm glad you read and appreciated my comment on humanistic Jewish views of the Sabbath. The idea of a day of rest for ordinary working people was a huge social reform!
Patricia, I saw an interview of Grumpy Cat (a.k.a. Tardar Sauce) and one of her humans. Yes, Grumpy Cat is a girl, and she's actually a very sweet and sociable kitty who was purring when the interviewer held her.
Thanks Melinda, Joan, and Ruth, I'm glad you like my visual response. Most things are better with cats! I'm lucky to have "inherited" a computer with Photoshop -- about half of which is over my head -- but you can do such things with many image editing programs, including the free "GIMP". I used the magic wand to "erase" the white dots, leaving them as transparent holes, then put the cat on a layer underneath.
(Photoshop geeks: I used a layer mask. Before using the magic wand, I'd tried selecting the dots all at once based on gray level, but that either got light bits of background or left jagged, aliased edges. If there were hundreds of dots I'd have worked out a more automatic method.)
Comment by Ian Mason on April 13, 2013 at 3:52am Sorry to hear about Jerry, Felaine. I'm sure you'll be a great care giver for him.
I agree that it's a good thing to be science literate but I just can't manage it. Even if I do understand explanations I forget them again, sometimes within minutes. If numbers are involved then it's a waste of everyone's time. By the time the explanation's come to an end I've forgotten the beginning. Just let me revel in the arts and I'm happy.
Nerdlass replied to matthew greenberg's discussion Daily Show takes on Christian persecution
Tom Sarbeck replied to Tom Sarbeck's discussion Men have sex and women make love. Or do they? in the group Secular Sexuality
Debra Stevenson replied to Atheist Andrea's discussion Are you open about being an atheist or are you in the closet?
Debra Stevenson replied to Atheist Andrea's discussion Are you open about being an atheist or are you in the closet?
Debra Stevenson replied to James M. Martin's discussion Sorry for the Hype, But This Might Make You Laugh
Nerdlass replied to James M. Martin's discussion Sorry for the Hype, But This Might Make You Laugh
Debra Stevenson replied to James M. Martin's discussion Sorry for the Hype, But This Might Make You Laugh
Emma Lennon replied to James M. Martin's discussion Sorry for the Hype, But This Might Make You Laugh
Emma Lennon liked James M. Martin's discussion Sorry for the Hype, But This Might Make You Laugh© 2013 Atheist Nexus. All rights reserved. Admin: Richard Haynes.


You need to be a member of Hang With Friends to add comments!