June 15, 2011

I just read the Constitution Party's Platform http://www.constitutionparty.com/party_platform.php and am really distraught. 

 

I am a firm believer of the constitution and this is such a cherry picked interpretation of our non-theistic constitution and bill of rights that it is frightening.  Why doesn't the party just call it the Christian Dogma Party.  

 

You can see where these people are headed, and it's not where I want to go.   I don't disagree with everything, however, a large portion of it made my hair stand on end.  I wonder how many members they have and if they will become a viable force?

 

Please take a few minutes and read the platform, then let's share our thoughts. How do we as atheists step up to this type of interpretation that aims to dismantle secular education, bans abortion - no exceptions, takes women out of combat (gives women way too much power), impeaches judges that don't abide by god's law (good behavior), etc.  What bugs you the most?

Views: 27

Replies to This Discussion

What bugs me, saddens me really, most is that anyone in the US of A is so troubled that they would submit to the tyranny the Constitution Party's founders intend. What I've read looks much like the plan of the Xian Reconstructionists, who would replace the Constitution with the Old Testament. Why the OT? Probably because, for them, the New Testament is too socialistic. Loving their neighbors as they love themselves, or concernfor the poor is no part of their plan. Power is their goal, and in that race Roman Catholicism has a 2000-year lead on them. Amateurs all. Calling their Party what it is would require more honesty than they have.

 

If they leave out the new testament, they will have to leave out hell, because not until gentle jesus did folks get sent to burn for eternity.  The constitution party gives me diarrhea.
I never made it past their preamble's first sentence "The Constitution Party gratefully acknowledges the blessing of our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ as Creator," before rejecting everything 100%

I didn't either.  It was insta-eyeball-roll and close the page for me.  :D

 

Unfortunately, I guess I'm just not open-minded enough to spare my time for nutjob ideas and proposals.

The Constitution Party introduction should have been enough of a clue.

The sole purpose of government, as stated in the Declaration of Independence, is to secure our unalienable rights given us by our Creator.

When Government grows beyond this scope, it is usurpation, and liberty is compromise.

 

Here's a link to information about the Christian theocracy movement you may you may find informative.

The Christians in the constitution party seem to think Christianity is the support for the Constitution and our bill of tights. Actually the constitution supports religious freedom but not the creedocentric delusions of Christians per se.
The Constitution party is populated with illiterate xenophobes and nitwits.

I've heard of this party before. They have a few surprises but mostly the usual contradictory right wing beliefs. I hope it will capture some of the teabag/religious right vote, anyway.

 

I like how they talk about being "stewards for the Earth" and then proceed to talk about multiplying and being fruitful, global warming being fake, and repealing lots of environmenta acts.

 

And how they invoke free speech in the same sentence as banning pornography.

Great link in the post by member Andrew Hall in the "Humor" section on here about the Constitution Party's protest of a statue of the Hindu god Ganesha in downtown Coeur d'Alene, Idaho.

Also, check out http://www.andhranews.net/Intl/2011/Counter-demonstrators-outnumber....

Apparently the US Constitution forbids people from worshiping "demons," but is OK with magic incantations to a cosmic Jewish zombie.

One sign opposing the Ganesha sculpture read "The veneration of the idols is the worship of demons"

Apparently the protestors had no problem with their idol "St. Francis of Assisi", which is also on display.

i agree with akron and tara campbell - that's exactly when i stopped reading. you can't give credence to anything beyond that if the entire platform takes us away from what the constitution, the bills of rights and the declaration of independence were intended for - a secular government.

the only way to step up is a continual dialogue with people who might be led to believe this would be best for our country. that and fighting it every step of the way through legal action, media, social networks and whatever else we can avail ourselves of. history can not be allowed to be rewritten to suit the religious rights desire to make this a christianist nation.

it bugs me most that this actually has to occur since the constitution was actually a pretty brilliant piece to begin with. i guess the activist side of me likes that, but the atheist side of me is disgusted with the sheep in this country who are led by their lack of understanding.

I rolled my eyes at the preamble too, but kept reading.  In 2008 there were nearly a half million people registered with the Constitution party, most also registered with the American Independent Party from California as well.  The Constitution party gained major party status in Colorado in the last elections.  

 

So while intellectually, one can say, don't give these people any credence because it's nonsense, they are gaining momentum and it is troubling.  I am a humanist and have great faith in humans who are reasoning and rational, but am very scared of righteous humans who are not reasoning, often deluded, and politcally organized.

RSS

CONNECT WITH ATHEIST NEXUS

Latest Activity

Akron SSA posted a status
28 minutes ago
Steph S. commented on Ruth Anthony-Gardner's group Hang With Friends
"Summer school starts next week for me."
35 minutes ago
Pat commented on Randall Smith's blog post The Rednecks are coming, the Rednecks are coming
"@blue pashima. The woman being interviewed by Blitzer has a TON of class! @Randall. I tend to agree about rednecks.  Personal bias on my part, but the sound of Country and Western music is, to me, the equivalent of a knife scraping against a…"
36 minutes ago
Napoleon Bonaparte shared their discussion on Twitter
45 minutes ago
Napoleon Bonaparte liked Napoleon Bonaparte's discussion Liberty Fraternity Anarchy - Le Punk Francais (Podcast)
46 minutes ago
Steph S. replied to Loren Miller's discussion Latest Activity?
"Yeah profile information is not showing at all. I went to EDIT and it is not there - just the basic information. "
52 minutes ago
Steph S. replied to Loren Miller's discussion Latest Activity?
"Yeah I have not tried to Edit my profile - I am checking now to see if that works"
54 minutes ago
Loren Miller commented on blue pashmina's blog post Not believing in an afterlife does not mean i am a "sad' person.
"There are a TON of assumptions out there about atheists, mostly promulgated by believers and very often by believers who have NEVER MET an atheist!  This is where speaking out continues to be so very important, and me 'at's off to you…"
55 minutes ago

© 2013   Atheist Nexus. All rights reserved. Admin: Richard Haynes.

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service