Tags:
Permalink Reply by Tom Sarbeck on March 2, 2013 at 11:52pm Alan, from an initialist (one who signs his initials instead of his full name):
initialism - a significative group of initial letters.
Both are in a 1971 Compact Edition OED, in which P. P. C. R. is an 1899 instance of the latter.
I often indicate my consent with my initials without the full stops, and so plead guilty to being an initialist.
In a 2005 NOAD: initialism - an abbreviation consisting of initial letters pronounced separately (e.g., CPU). A subsense, an acronym.
Permalink Reply by Alan Perlman on March 3, 2013 at 11:47am Tom,
It's a useful distinction. Thanks for the info.
Alan
Permalink Reply by Alan Perlman on March 2, 2013 at 12:49pm To Tom and GC...You don't need to know the terminology. but you do need to know which ones are pronounced as words (NATO) and which are not (YMCA), or you will really sound funny.
Unfortunately, there's no hard-and fast rule. SAT is pronounced "ess-ae-tee," because it might be mistaken for the very common word sat. But LSAT is pronounced according to yet another rule: "pronounce the name of the first letter, then all the rest as one word." Military jargon is full of these.
My favorite redundancy (admittedly esoteric) is the hoi pollioi -- hoi means 'the'.
Permalink Reply by Joan Denoo on February 27, 2013 at 1:48pm I am not lazy, nor am I stupid. I am a poor speller and terrible at writing grammatically. Please, if you see an error in my composition and notify me, I will be most grateful. My daughter and I are trying to catch each other's errors and she is as bad as I.
Permalink Reply by Tom Sarbeck on February 27, 2013 at 8:00pm As to spelling, Joan, you're not alone.
Thomas Jefferson, in letters to his daughter, nagged her to spell better than he did.
In one draft of the Decl. of Indep. he wrote both 'inalienable' and 'unalienable'.
Permalink Reply by Lillie on February 28, 2013 at 5:32pm The smartest Mensa person I ever met could not spell so I quit worrying about it. You couldn't read his writing either. Maybe they just can't be bothered with such mediocre things.
Permalink Reply by Natalie A Sera on March 1, 2013 at 10:54pm I CAN spell well, and my grammar isn't so shabby either, but I'm convinced that what I call "perfect spelling" is an inborn gift, and not at all indicative of intelligence, any more than talent at art or music is. I have it, but no one else in my family does. But my mother and son are very good spellers, so I think it's something recessive, LOL. The thing is, when I was young, and hadn't been exposed to the deplorable spelling that's going around today, all I had to do is see a word once, and it was indelibly etched in my brain. Sort of like a snapshot library. Nowadays, I've seen words spelled wrong so many times that the photos have gotten blurry, and I will, on occasion, spell something wrong.
One thing that amuses me is that I saw my ESL students spell the word "girl" as "gril" so often, that "gril" is now superimposed on my photo. They BOTH look right to me now, but because the word is used so often, I do know which one is right. If it were an uncommon word, I might not actually know! :-)
The other thing that is fun, is to watch how people use the pronoun "I". We got so confused by our grammarian English teachers that we can barely use the pronouns at all. Like when I hear someone say "Myself and my wife would like to invite you...." Or when someone says, (here comes nasty, naughty Natalie) "she is as bad as I." If I were editing (which I am not -- just having fun with language), I would say "she is as bad as I am." Or colloquially, "she's as bad as me." I know that your teachers carefully taught you to say it that way, but I don't think anyone actually says that, unless they are trying to be formal. And I'm sure that prescriptive grammarians might disagree with me, which is why I DIDN'T get an 800 on the SAT English in high school, nor on the GRE. To which I give them a great, big raspberry!
Love you, Joan! :-)
Permalink Reply by Alan Perlman on March 2, 2013 at 12:59pm Natalie & others...English spelling is difficult for many reasons -- the thousands of homonym pairs, the survival of older spellings whose letters are silent (e.g., though), the complex rules for doubling consonants and the accompanying vowel sounds (stripping vs. striping), and much more. Barring cognitive disabilities, it can be learned by anyone with enough practice. Early reading is essential so that you can "re-visualize" the word when it comes time to write it.
G.B. Shaw pointed out that with the vagaries of English spelling, you could spell fish as "ghoti" -- the gh from cough gives you the f sound; o is pronounced i in women, and the ti is pronounced sh in countless -tion words.
Permalink Reply by SteveInCO on March 7, 2013 at 9:31pm Gril vs. Girl... I heard once that the word "bird" was originally "brid" and people just began pronouncing and spelling it the other way.
Permalink Reply by Joan Denoo on February 27, 2013 at 1:50pm Grinning Cat, I didn't know "redundancy of "HIV virus". Thanks for the information.
Permalink Reply by Ruth Anthony-Gardner on February 27, 2013 at 10:47pm Sometimes I discover a misspelling after I've added a post. If it's a comment, to not look stupid I'd have to delete everything. I usually choose to look stupid. At least discussions can be edited later, excepting for their title. How could I not have noticed that glaring problem - oops too late. As I get older the error rate seems to increase exponentially. Keyboard dyslexia - I haz it. Of course LOLspeak haz infected my everyday speech too.
Roswatheist, we drove by a nuerologist sign for about five years before it was changed. Would you go to a specialist who couldn't spell his specialty?
Steph S. Online

Richard Haynes Online


Paul Hutchinson Online
Posted by Larry Taylor on May 20, 2013 at 8:15pm 4 Comments 1 Like
OK. I am venting. My mother died two weeks ago. She was a “god fearing christian.” Before her death she refused all medical treatment. She wanted to be left alone. She even refused to speak with my brother who is a methodist minister. He is a pip, let me tell you! I suspect she did not believe, but a woman born in her time could not and did not state her actual beliefs. This is the opening salvo to all christians; FUCK YOU! I had so many people come and tell…
ContinuePosted by Christy Stewart on May 20, 2013 at 2:17pm 6 Comments 0 Likes
This probably should not have shocked me as much as it did (especially since I am in Texas). I actually thought my coworkers were playing a joke on me because they know I am an atheist. Sadly, this was no joke. This actually happened.
I work in a psychiatric hospital. The doctors who admit patients are general MDs. (Psychiatrists see patients after admission) Yesterday evening we received several calls from irate parents. A new doctor who was doing admissions yesterday actually…
ContinuePosted by Debra Stevenson on May 20, 2013 at 1:09pm 0 Comments 0 Likes
What do you think of this,
Nathan Young,
No Jason Torpy it is you that should be banned for promoting atheism, a belief that has no foundation in reality and zero proof behind it. The letter was a mockery of your atheist beliefs. I request to the board here that they remove Jason for his unverifiable beliefs in atheism for which he has no proof other than his arrogance. The letter was a mockery of atheism. Atheism is stupid and it should be mocked and it…
ContinuePosted by Debra Stevenson on May 20, 2013 at 12:42pm 3 Comments 0 Likes
What do you think of this Facebook comment?
Nathan Young to Jason Torpy,
for once you and I can agree on something. We should disrespect beliefs that are untenable such as the belief that there is no God. Indeed for me to respect you Jason, I cannot respect your belief in non-belief in atheism. Your atheism comes across as arrogrance, smugness, and self righteous. Indeed after reading "An Open Letter to My Religious Friends" I penned one…
ContinueAdded by Napoleon Bonaparte 0 Comments 0 Likes
Added by Loren Miller 0 Comments 1 Like
© 2013 Atheist Nexus. All rights reserved. Admin: Richard Haynes.