Target: United States Congress
Sponsored by: Brittany E.G.

Aurora, Colorado Rep. Ed Perlmutte has called on US Congress to reinstate the assault weapons ban.

Rep. Perlmutte represents the district where a recent movie theater shooting left 12 dead and 58 wounded. He points to the fact that the shooter, James Holmes, was able to gather a colossal amount of lethal weaponry in a short amount of time: "enough ammunition for a small army".

Incidents of mass shootings have increased drastically since the 1970s. The carnage is much greater when assault weapons are involved. In Aurora, James Holmes was able to use his own assault weapon to shoot dozens of people in the 90 seconds it took for police to arrive.

Banning assault rifles would, at the very least, decrease the number of individuals killed or injured in these situations, saving lives.

These weapons, some of which can fire 50 to 60 bullets per minute, belong in highly capable and trained hands only. Please tell the United States Congress to reinstate the assault rifle ban immediately!



Follow the link below to sign!

http://www.thepetitionsite.com/727/105/036/reinstate-the-assault-ri...

Views: 54

Replies to This Discussion

I signed it, and added a note that it's time for congress to stop kissing the NRA's butt.  I was nice, I said "rear end."  Okay?

Thank you!

Nope. Will never be for prohibition. Care nothing whether it would or wuoldn't "save lives", (it wouldn't), but irrelevant anyway. People have the right to own guns if they want them.

Right - I understand - no problem El Solo Lobo.

The ban on assault rifles should definitely be reinstated.  I know that people have the right to bear arms, but some arms are not meant to be beared by civilians.  What does a civilian need with an assault rifle anyway?

I wonder the same thing.

Why a person may "need" such a rifle is not relevant. As long as theyhurt no one, they should have it if they want it.

Signed gladly.

I signed it Steph. :)

Thanks for posting this, Steph.  I'm glad to sign.  The general public has no compelling or legitimate reason to own and possess such a weapon.   

RSS

CONNECT WITH ATHEIST NEXUS

Latest Activity

Ruth Anthony-Gardner replied to Ruth Anthony-Gardner's discussion Rossby waves - what happens in the Arctic doesn't stay in the Arctic in the group Climate Concerns
9 minutes ago
Gordon Clay replied to Debra Stevenson's discussion Joseph Smith's life before Mormonism in the group Ex-Mormon Atheists
11 minutes ago
Ruth Anthony-Gardner replied to Ruth Anthony-Gardner's discussion Countries at most risk from Climate Change in the group Eco-Logical: A Group for Environmentalists
30 minutes ago
Ruth Anthony-Gardner added a discussion to the group Politics, Economics, and Religion
37 minutes ago
Greg replied to Maia Rodriguez's discussion Tornado Survivor Did Not Thank God
41 minutes ago
Peter Cordel updated their profile
45 minutes ago
Chris Haughey replied to Joe S.'s discussion Intergroup Intelligentsia - The Thought Police in the group Atheists, Addictions, 12 Step Recovery, and Alternatives
50 minutes ago
Karim R. replied to Carrot Hare's discussion Atheists around the world! ASSEMBLE!
1 hour ago
Richard Fortuna replied to Carrot Hare's discussion Atheists around the world! ASSEMBLE!
1 hour ago
Luara commented on Napoleon Bonaparte's video
2 hours ago
Boothby171 liked matthew greenberg's discussion YES!!!! Wolf Blitzer asked the wrong person if she thanked the Lord....
2 hours ago
Boothby171 replied to John Jubinsky's discussion Parents Lose a Second Child from Opting for Faith Healing in the group Atheist News
2 hours ago

© 2013   Atheist Nexus. All rights reserved. Admin: Richard Haynes.

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service