Corporations ask US Supreme Court for immunity for human rights abuses

Another news story emphasizing the need for Americans to pay attention to the presidential elections, as the next president could appoint several Supreme Court justices.

From NewsDaily:

For more than three decades survivors of human rights abuses in foreign countries have turned to U.S. federal courts to seek justice. On Monday the U.S. Supreme Court hears a case that could make that impossible.

The case pits a Nigerian widow against a multinational oil company. Esther Kiobel and others say Royal Dutch Petroleum (Shell) helped the Nigerian government commit human rights violations against her husband, who was executed in 1995. Shell has denied the allegations and argues that cases involving foreign governments committing atrocities in their own countries do not belong in the U.S. court system at all.

That the justices are considering the sweeping question of whether an entire class of lawsuits can be heard in the United States can be traced to briefs filed by three lawyers whose clients aren't even involved in the case.

... A ruling against Kiobel could wipe out lawsuits [under the Alien Tort Statute] pending against companies such as Exxon Mobil Corp, Rio Tinto Plc and Nestle, which are accused by private plaintiffs of helping governments violate human rights in Indonesia, Papua New Guinea and Ivory Coast, respectively.

... (read the entire story)

Tags: Alien Tort Statute, BP, Caterpillar, Chevron, Conoco, Exxon Mobil, General Electric, Honeywell, IBM, Nestle, More…Shell, Supreme Court, U.S. Supreme Court, abuses, atrocities, corporations, human rights, justice, unelected corporate government

Views: 37

Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by Tammy S on October 1, 2012 at 11:57am

6 Of these asshats went to a mass this weekend, wherein they were spoken to about the Catholic Church's stance against gay marriage and the theme was included in the mass. In other words, the church is seeking to legislate from the pulpit and should be taxed for breaking the law and Supreme Court Justices should be subject to the same disciplinary actions as other Federal court judges and should not be 'lifetime' appointees.

Permalink Reply by Ruth Anthony-Gardner on October 2, 2012 at 10:18am

Great graphic, GrinningCat! This could be a blow for international justice. Another step in corporate destruction of the last shreds of democracy.

Permalink Reply by Grinning Cat on October 2, 2012 at 9:00pm

I wish I'd come up with that idea of the "new Supreme Court robes". It's on the web in many places, and quite apropos.

(Ruth, your visually rich communication has inspired me to make an effort to reinforce my posts with appropriate images, whether original, remixed, or simply borrowed.)

RSS

Members

Blog Posts

Death of a family member

Posted by Larry Taylor on May 20, 2013 at 6:15pm 1 Comment

OK. I am venting. My mother died two weeks ago. She was a “god fearing christian.” Before her death she refused all medical treatment. She wanted to be left alone. She even refused to speak with my brother who is a methodist minister. He is a pip, let me tell you! I suspect she did not believe, but a woman born in her time could not and did not state her actual beliefs. This is the opening salvo to all christians; FUCK YOU! I had so many people come and tell…

Continue

Unbelievable!!!!!!!!

Posted by Christy Stewart on May 20, 2013 at 12:17pm 6 Comments

This probably should not have shocked me as much as it did (especially since I am in Texas). I actually thought my coworkers were playing a joke on me because they know I am an atheist. Sadly, this was no joke. This actually happened.

I work in a psychiatric hospital. The doctors who admit patients are general MDs. (Psychiatrists see patients after admission) Yesterday evening we received several calls from irate parents. A new doctor who was doing admissions yesterday actually…

Continue

anti-atheist rant from an Orthodox Mormon part 2

Posted by Debra Stevenson on May 20, 2013 at 11:09am 0 Comments

What do you think of this,

 

Nathan Young,

 

No Jason Torpy it is you that should be banned for promoting atheism, a belief that has no foundation in reality and zero proof behind it.  The letter was a mockery of your atheist beliefs.  I request to the board here that they remove Jason for his unverifiable beliefs in atheism for which he has no proof other than his arrogance.  The letter was a mockery of atheism.  Atheism is stupid and it should be mocked and it…

Continue

Anti-atheist post from an Orthdox Mormon

Posted by Debra Stevenson on May 20, 2013 at 10:42am 2 Comments

 

What do you think of this Facebook comment?

 

 

Nathan Young to Jason Torpy,

 

for once you and I can agree on something.  We should disrespect beliefs that are untenable such as the belief that there is no God.  Indeed for me to respect you Jason, I cannot respect your belief in non-belief in atheism.  Your atheism comes across as arrogrance, smugness, and self righteous.  Indeed after reading "An Open Letter to My Religious Friends" I penned one…

Continue

Events

Videos

  • Add Videos
  • View All

© 2013   Atheist Nexus. All rights reserved. Admin: Richard Haynes.

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service