The World’s Largest Coalition of Nontheists and Nontheist Communities!
Nontheist lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and intersex people & friends. Discussions, news, opinions. Get to know your fellow rainbow nontheists!
Latest Activity: 2 hours ago
Started by James M. Martin. Last reply by Joan Denoo 2 hours ago.
Started by James M. Martin. Last reply by The Flying Atheist 3 hours ago.
Started by James M. Martin. Last reply by James M. Martin yesterday.
Started by Ruth Anthony-Gardner. Last reply by Sentient Biped May 3.
Started by James M. Martin. Last reply by Sentient Biped Apr 25.
Started by Napoleon Bonaparte. Last reply by Debra Stevenson Apr 23.
Started by Debra Stevenson. Last reply by Debra Stevenson Apr 22.
Started by Debra Stevenson Apr 22.
Started by Debra Stevenson Apr 22.
Started by Sentient Biped. Last reply by Grinning Cat Apr 20.
@SentientThanks for the video. I didn't realize there was discrimination like that against "Asians." To be completely honest, I never thought of them as people "of color," as the guy in the video referred to himself. It's hard for me to blame people for not being attracted to people of color, as my attraction definitely has limits too. Is it conditioned? Probably. Could it be overcome? Perhaps, but I have no real desire to change even if it could.
Sentient, you can read into it what you want, but his words are exactly how I feel. He doesn't just think "sexuality is diverse"; he thinks sexuality is so diverse that it can't be "reduced to binary terms." Even in the time of our discussion on here, I have included links that attack the construct validity of dichotomous sexual orientation, which is exactly what Vidal has done. It's kind of like pointing out the absurdity that anyone would be biologically exclusively attracted to one sex when sexuality is so complex.For the record, I do see how a man of your faith could interpret it differently, as if sexuality is so complex that it cannot be accurately defined by singling out one attribute like sex. Doing so might even be deceptive, but not necessarily untrue.
Thank you The Nerd. Just asked to be a member.
Thank you for posting. You are right, we get an interesting perspective looking at the past. We still have progress needed ahead, but we have come so far....
Hi all...first time I post here but watching these videos is making me feel not too bad about being teased in high school......really. I can't believe that was the way it was back then.
The quote that I posted is not what you said. Posting it again ""idal has consistently argued that the term "homosexual" has no validity, because human sexuality is too complex and diverse to be reduced to binary terms." That does not state that he thinks all humans are bisexual. It says he thinks human sexuality is diverse. If he meant that he thinks all humans are bisexual, he would say so - Vidal is nothing if not careful with his words. Other than that correction, again, I won't be baited into that discussion again.
@SentientJust out of curiosity, what is it that you think separates Vidal's view from any other view that all humans have the potential to be attracted to both sexes (aka "are bisexual") that gives his more validity?@Dallas GaytheistI think Gore Vidal is me? Also, that propaganda video is terrible... I hate how harmful ignorance can be...
You've got mail! (here today a stroll outside would have the cold shower effect. Typical Pacific Northwest day.
Doesn't do any good.
Welcome toAtheist Nexus
Sign Upor Sign In
Or sign in with:
Click to Buy Amazon items and help A|N
© 2013 Atheist Nexus. All rights reserved. Admin: Brother Richard.
Report an Issue |
Terms of Service
Please check your browser settings or contact your system administrator.