The World's Largest Coalition of Nontheists and Nontheist Communities!
Nontheist lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and intersex people & friends.
Latest Activity: 23 hours ago
Started by Ruth Anthony-Gardner. Last reply by Grinning Cat Apr 12.
Started by Bertold Brautigan. Last reply by Bertold Brautigan Apr 10.
Started by Steph S. Apr 7.
Started by Jacob Dreiling. Last reply by Bertold Brautigan Mar 27.
Started by Neon Genesis. Last reply by Grinning Cat Mar 27.
Started by Daniel W. Last reply by Susan Stanko Mar 17.
Started by Daniel W. Last reply by Joan Denoo Mar 11.
Started by Ruth Anthony-Gardner. Last reply by Ruth Anthony-Gardner Feb 11.
Started by Pat. Last reply by sk8eycat Feb 10.
Started by Christina Fiscus. Last reply by Susan Stanko Jan 25.
Anti-LGBT Groups Hope To Make Virginia ‘Ground Zero’ In Fight Against School Transgender Protections
Living In His Own Reality, Cruz Files Constitutional Amendment To Ban Same-Sex Marriage
How To Talk About Bruce Jenner
The Hidden Significance Of The ‘Would You Attend A Same-Sex Wedding?’ Question
The Surprising Religious Breakdown Of Same-Sex Marriage Support
Thanks for that video, Daniel!
Bertold, "Sanctity of Marriage Alabama", on their Facebook page, is unwittingly demonstrating the parallel between racial discrimination and gender and sexual-orientation discrimination, the parallel they and NOM are denying:
(They're also demonstrating their religiously-based animus, which will look really good to the Supreme Court! :-)
The National Organization for Marriage is planning a massive "march on Washington" in April, and they've sent out a fundraising invitation letter to the nation comparing this effort to the original 1963 march for equal rights, replete with attempts at comparing their own efforts to those of MLK.
I can't promise you that we will have a historic speech like Dr. King's "I have a dream" speech, nor can I promise you 250,000 people will come to Washington, but I can promise you this: we will march for a true and just cause, for the civil right of Americans to enjoy the benefits of natural marriage, the union of one man and one woman, the foundation of society and the cradle of civilization.
. . . . You see, this is our last, best chance to demonstrate to the justices of the United States Supreme Court that the American people are opposed to redefining marriage and will not sit idly by while the elite and unaccountable judges rip marriage from the social foundations of society.
Added a nice video to the txt box. Lot of truth in that video, and sweet to boot.
Mr. Brautigan, the species is Homo sexual. That's different from the species Homo sapiens.
Mr. Cat, that's probably one of the few times that the voter count issue acted in our favor. Although, I recall many elections were "protect us from the homos" was a major push to get the xenophobes to the ballot. If my faulty memory serves, something to the effect of Karl Rove's "God, guns, and gays" campaign strategy. Maybe Slovaks are too lazy for that to work, or maybe they are not as homophobic as Americans are.
Yes, our man Frankie also just appointed a slew of new rabidly homophobic cardinals. I guess he hasn't seen The Birdcage.
The anti-equality referendum in Slovakia (which would have also banned adoption by same-sex couples, and allowed parents to remove their children from sex education) failed spectacularly, with only 21% of eligible voters casting ballots.
In Slovakia a referendum vote is binding only with a turnout of at least 50%. LGBT-rights groups had urged opponents of the referendum to stay home for that reason.
(Of course, the heterosexist supremacists are probably trumpeting the 90-95% yes votes among those people who did show up. And now, more than ever before, we've seen the new Pope's true colors.)
The U.S. State Department is planning to appoint a special envoy "to advocate for the rights of lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender people overseas." [Boston Globe] Legislation to accomplish this was introduced in Congress last week. Representative Chris Smith, R NJ, head of the subcommittee over human rights and international organizations, said "I am a strong believer in traditional marriage and I do not construe homosexual rights as human rights."
That would clearly entail the contention that homosexuals are therefore not humans. Gee, I wonder what species he thinks we belong to???
I would think the pope would be more against heterosexual marriage, then. They are too waskally to trust. Even so, he's come out officially against marriage equality in Slovakia.
Why Pope Fudd thinks he should have a role in Slovakia politicsis beyond me.
The Bible contains six admonishments to homosexuals and 362 admonishments to heterosexuals. That doesn't mean that God doesn't love heterosexuals. It's just that they need more supervision. —Lynn Lavner
Welcome toAtheist Nexus
Sign Upor Sign In
Or sign in with:
Nexus on Social Media:
© 2015 Atheist Nexus. All rights reserved. Admin: Richard Haynes.
Report an Issue |
Terms of Service
Please check your browser settings or contact your system administrator.