I felt this video took 10 minutes to say what should have been said in 1 minute. Maybe you'll find more in it than I did.



This video is VERY long. I post it here because of the question and answer period at the end of the video -- Dennett did not do well.






Tags: dennett, evitability, free, will

Views: 0

Replies to This Discussion

I always enjoy Dennett. Although this one wasn't a good as some of the others I've seen, it's important to remember that the content of a public lecture -- particularly if there is no guarantee of the background of the audience -- needs to be much different than the precis of a book. And the presentation needs be different, also.

I'm not surprised that his ideas meet resistance. Thousands of years of "what is obviously true" aren't overcome easily, no matter how logical or correct the arguments are.

An important point -- which is where Dennett started -- is that a sensible analysis of determinism and free will is required to have any chance of having a rational criminal justice system. To argue for one viewpoint or the other without addressing that concern is to miss the point of why it even matters.
Hi Glenn,

Yes, law would be pointless without free will. Actually, it's only purpose would be to justify the punishment of violators. Intent and guilt would be removed from law, leaving only consequence and punishment: rehabilitation would also be pointless without free will. The fact that laws can work as well as they do provides empirical evidence for the human capacity for free will. Laws are causal factors that influence our choices and usually carry more weight than our individual plans for the future. But sometimes we choose, with eyes wide open, to violate the law if the reward is deemed worth the risk. We do this when speeding or cheating on our taxes or robbing a bank. We know we are responsible for our actions.

I do enjoy reading Dennett much more than listening to him. He speaks haltingly and less eloquently than, say, Sam Harris or Christopher Hitchens. If you've ever watched the Four Horsemen (Dawkins, Dennett, Harris, Hitchens) videos from YouTube, you can observe the difference directly.

RSS

CONNECT WITH ATHEIST NEXUS

Latest Activity

Napoleon Bonaparte shared their discussion on Twitter
18 minutes ago
joseph f logston joined Aleksandra Zivkovic's group
Thumbnail

Zeitgeist

Hmm... try to make a wild guess, what this group is dedicated to.
36 minutes ago
joseph f logston liked Aleksandra Zivkovic's group Zeitgeist
39 minutes ago
joseph f logston liked Sentient Biped's group Godless in the garden
40 minutes ago
joseph f logston liked matthew greenberg's discussion YES!!!! Wolf Blitzer asked the wrong person if she thanked the Lord....
48 minutes ago
Sentient Biped replied to Loren Miller's discussion Latest Activity?
"On the top bar, go to "my pages" then "my photos".  There is an "add" button.  Click it.  Follow the instructions.  I just now did it to test.  It works."
1 hour ago
Tom Sarbeck replied to Alexandra's discussion Need help with irreducible complexity
"Alexandra, I'm going to try. I will first deal with possible communication problems. In every attempt at communication, thoughts have to pass through several "screens" (a Zen idea), and at any of these screens errors can harm the…"
1 hour ago
Lillie replied to Ruth Anthony-Gardner's discussion Cicadas taste like asparagus in the group THE KNIFE & FORK
"Saw where they are having swarms in Fredericksburg, Virginia."
1 hour ago

© 2013   Atheist Nexus. All rights reserved. Admin: Richard Haynes.

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service