Virginia House getting all up in your vagina
The freedom and liberty loving party is requiring the state to take liberty with Virginia women's vaginas. Women will not have the freedom to refuse.
The Virginia House passed a bill 63-36 requiring that women who wish to have an abortion must submit to a "transvaginal ultrasound."
The ultrasound legislation would constitute an unprecedented government mandate to insert vaginal ultrasonic probes into women as part of a state-ordered effort to dissuade them from terminating pregnancies, legislative opponents noted.
This is totally medically unnecessary invasive procedure. It serves no purpose other than to humiliate and shame women and intimidate them from choosing a legal medical procedure.[Emphasis mine]
Isn't this the same party that claims government shouldn't regulate businesses!
Tags:
Permalink Reply by Joseph P on February 18, 2012 at 11:27pm I heard about it this morning. It fits the legal definition of rape, in Virginia.
Dan Savage (http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archives/2012/02/16/vagina-is-for-...) had a bit to say about it, with some links to Rachel Maddow's show.
Permalink Reply by Joseph P on February 18, 2012 at 11:42pm Tea Party bullshit from the 2010 midterm elections. They took over state legislatures with the promise of focusing on economic issues, then immediately began pushing ultra-conservative social legislation.
We have a gay-marriage-ban constitutional amendment up for vote in North Carolina, in the spring, because of those assholes.
Permalink Reply by annet on February 19, 2012 at 12:35am Ugh, well it looks like Texas has already beaten out everybody on crazy in this regard. Do providers really comply with this stuff?
....Texas, which in 2011 passed arguably the country’s most sweeping ultrasound law. Where Virginia would have providers offer a viewing of the ultrasound image, Texas requires much more. Providers there must both make an audible heartbeat of the fetus available and provide a detailed description of the fetus pictured in the sonogram.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/ezra-klein/post/is-virginias-ul...
Permalink Reply by Joseph P on February 19, 2012 at 12:42am I've heard that they provide their own, artificial heartbeat-track, if necessary, if the abortion is done before the fetus has developed sufficiently to have a detectable heartbeat.
Randall Smith replied to Steph S.'s discussion 10 Things You Can't Do and Become President in the group Hang With Friends
jay H replied to Loren Miller's discussion Morals in Men - Morals in Chimps - Why? (CNN - Kelly Murray)
Debra Stevenson replied to Debra Stevenson's discussion Camp Meeting in the group Ex-Adventists and Seventh-day Atheists
Debra Stevenson replied to Athianarchist's discussion So What Made You First Start To Doubt?
Tom Sarbeck replied to Sentient Biped's discussion Origins of Religion in the Paleolithic Age in the group Getting Religion
Tom Sarbeck replied to Sentient Biped's discussion Origins of Religion in the Paleolithic Age in the group Getting Religion
Joan Denoo replied to Sentient Biped's discussion Origins of Religion in the Paleolithic Age in the group Getting Religion
Tom Sarbeck replied to Sentient Biped's discussion Origins of Religion in the Paleolithic Age in the group Getting Religion© 2013 Atheist Nexus. All rights reserved. Admin: Brother Richard.