Tags:
Permalink Reply by TByte on August 10, 2011 at 4:46am
Permalink Reply by Creature on August 10, 2011 at 2:17pm Dude, knock it off. You haven't noticed all of the men posting here as opposed to the no boys allowed group? Come on.
I know that this is your playground, and that you enjoy seeing who you can get into an argument here, but come on. Surely you can come up with a better thread to start a fight in.
Permalink Reply by Susan Stanko on August 10, 2011 at 3:41pm
Permalink Reply by TByte on August 10, 2011 at 10:27pm
Permalink Reply by TByte on August 10, 2011 at 10:40pm If you enjoy baiting communists and libertarians, to you weigh in on the thread by the "Reactionary Atheist"?
I replied a few times, but then realized that I was wasting my time with a guy who's ideology was so whacked out that it had a total world-wide membership of one.
Permalink Reply by Joseph P on August 11, 2011 at 7:45am Which one is that? I don't remember him by name. The only name sticking in my head right now is Sodero Rojo, or something to that effect ... although I've seen one or two others, around and about, in other groups.
The libertarians are more numerous but no less dogmatic.
Permalink Reply by TByte on August 11, 2011 at 11:32pm Here's the link, Joseph.
If you missed this guy's odd ideology, you missed a real jaw-dropper.
http://www.atheistnexus.org/group/conservativeatheists/forum/topics...
Permalink Reply by Susan Stanko on August 12, 2011 at 7:43am
Permalink Reply by Joseph P on August 12, 2011 at 8:41am Wow, that idiot reminds me of S.E. Cupp. Atheist, but admiring of religion. That's so foolish. Of course, that's assuming that S.E. Cupp is even an atheist.
I dunno, I guess this guy lends credence to the reality of her non-belief, assuming he's for real, too.
- Men can use violence to defend their property, including their wives.
- Women are expected to be virgins at marriage.
- Prostitution is widely available.
- Women don't vote.
These four middle bullet-points are psychotic. I don't have a problem with prostitution, specifically, but it's completely at odds with every other stance he has about women. Very "I love sluts, but my wife and daughters won't be like that." Very schizoid.
I love how he filed wives under property.
Permalink Reply by Susan Stanko on August 12, 2011 at 9:03am I love how he filed wives under property.
Yeah, I am surprised that the women on that thread didn't jump on that one.
Permalink Reply by Susan Stanko on August 12, 2011 at 11:02am Speaking of psychotic, this was on his profile: I am a reactionary who recently joined Orthodox Judaism to escape from liberal society. And of course I am atheist.
This thread is more active: http://www.atheistnexus.org/forum/topics/i-m-a-reactionary-atheist?...
Permalink Reply by TByte on August 10, 2011 at 10:34pm
Dr. Allan H. Clark replied to Dr. Allan H. Clark's discussion Unforessen consequence of Obamacare
Tom Sarbeck replied to Anthony Jordan's discussion Poll Shows 29% of Americans Believe Armed Revolution May Become Necessary
Dr. Allan H. Clark replied to Anthony Jordan's discussion Poll Shows 29% of Americans Believe Armed Revolution May Become Necessary
Tom Sarbeck replied to Dr. Allan H. Clark's discussion Unforessen consequence of Obamacare
Jim DePaulo replied to Steph S.'s discussion 'Crazy ants' a threat in southern U.S. in the group Hang With Friends
Dr. Allan H. Clark replied to Dr. Allan H. Clark's discussion Unforessen consequence of Obamacare
Debra Stevenson replied to Debra Stevenson's discussion Humanistic Mormon Bishop's response to Elder's homophobic remark at GC
GOD'aye commented on GOD'aye's blog post THE THAW, CHRISTIAN DRONGO KID CULTURE, ENTER THE WORLDS DUMBEST YOUTH© 2013 Atheist Nexus. All rights reserved. Admin: Brother Richard.