Eco-Logical: A Group for Environmentalists

Information

Eco-Logical: A Group for Environmentalists

Eco-Logical is a group for anyone who cares about clean air, drinkable water, a sustainable economy, and environmental justice.

Location: The Irreplaceable Earth
Members: 331
Latest Activity: on Monday

Welcome to Eco-Logical: A Group for Environmentalists

 

Note: Sylvain Duford, the group's creator, has left A|N. I am acting as moderator of the group in his place. Please contact me if you have any questions. - Dallas the Phallus.

Discussion Forum

Global surface cooling caused by Atlantic warming

Started by Ruth Anthony-Gardner. Last reply by Ruth Anthony-Gardner on Monday. 1 Reply

Antarctica melting twice as fast

Started by Ruth Anthony-Gardner. Last reply by Ruth Anthony-Gardner on Saturday. 3 Replies

Methane Bomb

Started by Ruth Anthony-Gardner. Last reply by Ruth Anthony-Gardner Aug 21. 1 Reply

Abnormal Arctic

Started by Ruth Anthony-Gardner. Last reply by Ruth Anthony-Gardner Aug 17. 6 Replies

Antarctic process melts Arctic

Started by Ruth Anthony-Gardner. Last reply by Grinning Cat Jul 31. 1 Reply

Methane, more scary than we thought

Started by Ruth Anthony-Gardner. Last reply by Ruth Anthony-Gardner Jul 31. 30 Replies

Mass Extinction of Ocean Species soon to be Inevitable

Started by Ruth Anthony-Gardner. Last reply by Ruth Anthony-Gardner Jul 26. 12 Replies

signs of climate tipping points

Started by Ruth Anthony-Gardner. Last reply by Ruth Anthony-Gardner Jul 23. 25 Replies

Scorched Earth Coming

Started by Ruth Anthony-Gardner. Last reply by Ruth Anthony-Gardner Jul 11. 6 Replies

How to save our future

Started by Ruth Anthony-Gardner. Last reply by Ruth Anthony-Gardner Jul 9. 2 Replies

Good news

Started by Ruth Anthony-Gardner. Last reply by Grinning Cat Jul 7. 27 Replies

Systemic Pesticides Underestimated

Started by Ruth Anthony-Gardner. Last reply by Ruth Anthony-Gardner Jul 2. 1 Reply

Countries at most risk from Climate Change

Started by Ruth Anthony-Gardner. Last reply by Ruth Anthony-Gardner Jun 22. 22 Replies

Sour oceans = more toxic phytoplankton

Started by Ruth Anthony-Gardner Jun 19. 0 Replies

Melt of West Antarctic Ice Sheet Unstoppable

Started by Ruth Anthony-Gardner. Last reply by Grinning Cat Jun 10. 12 Replies

Another Positive Feedback we'd missed

Started by Ruth Anthony-Gardner. Last reply by Ruth Anthony-Gardner Jun 8. 2 Replies

Carbon Budget Is Now Zero

Started by Ruth Anthony-Gardner May 23. 0 Replies

Texas is turning into desert too

Started by Ruth Anthony-Gardner May 20. 0 Replies

East Antarctic Ice Sheet not so stable

Started by Ruth Anthony-Gardner. Last reply by Ruth Anthony-Gardner May 9. 1 Reply

Climate Denial Crock of the Week

Loading… Loading feed

Comment Wall

Comment

You need to be a member of Eco-Logical: A Group for Environmentalists to add comments!

Comment by Chris G on March 16, 2012 at 1:23am

A good first step in changing from consumption to sustainability would be to tax polluters. Maybe a tax should be placed on non-biodegradable packaging too. I read that every weekend more oil is dripped on the ground while mowing the lawn than was spilled by the Exxon Valdez tanker spill. The town I live in has a program to entice people to get rid of their lawns. I doesn't seem to work very well as most houses have lawns. Why aren't there three trees on every household subdivision lot. That would reduce greenhouse gas.

I read in several sources that gasoline is subsidized through military action among other ways and if that was removed gasoline would cost $10/gallon. It would cost $12/gallon if human health costs were factored in. As it is everyone shares in this cost for the convenience of private transportation. If people had to pay the real cost of gasoline they would be more apt to take public transportation.

I think everyone should recycle, but the elimination of the original package should come first. Plastic water bottles have to be the most wasteful consumer product ever developed and marketed.

A 100% biodegradable container that behaves like plastic that is made out of corn starch is available. Make the use of that mandatory. 

Why are there so many different kinds of power supplies? Mandating    size requirements would eliminate e-waste.

Comment by Guy on March 16, 2012 at 12:14am

As I said before. Do you have a method of getting from a unsustainable capitalist economy to another economic structure? This is a really BIG project. There are a few basic questions that need to be asked. What other economy would you propose? How do you get from here to there? War and mass destruction is a non answer. I came here looking for exciting solutions. I see where people want to fix it by changing the economy. How do you do that? Remember this is just not our countries this is the entire world we are talking about. There are other economic structures out there. Who's would you use and why? Then how do you get there?

Something I learned long ago was you need a plan and that plan requires small bites to eat the entire pie. If you take too large of a bite you sometimes make a mess. One of my bites is to reduce my consumption and recycle. Not too hard to swallow. It also makes it easier to move other people that direction when they see it can be done by other people. The occupy movement in some ways showed that but there was no end game and no plan. Other people were left wondering what were they doing and the media did a poor job explaining what the purpose was. The occupy movement did a poor job explaining what they were doing.

What type of a plan could be proposed to clean up the plastic in the ocean? Remember small bites working in the world we currently live in. Changing it is a really large bite more than I can handle. Doing nothing is as bad as the people who are making the mess. I am taking a small bite by asking these questions. If we all answer these questions we have started to eat the pie. 

I am just looking for ideas on next steps.

Comment by Chris G on March 15, 2012 at 3:07am

I think fundamental economic change is needed before environmental damage will stop and repair of earths systems will begin. With continual population growth even at slowed consumption rates environmental damage will continue. Until economies are based on sustainability instead of growth attempts at conservation have no significance - all it does is slow down the inevitable collapse of the major environmental systems leading to climatic catastrophe. Recycling may make individuals feel good, but it doesn't make a dent in the overall amount of stuff being used and thrown away, or washed to sea. Even if humans stopped fishing the oceans would die because of the rising pollution levels. Sea life will starve to death with bellies full of plastic. In case that's not enough Ocean acidity is higher than it's been in 300 million years because of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere. That carbon is caused by humans.

Comment by Guy on March 15, 2012 at 2:09am

I agree with the profound changes. If you have the capabilities to create those changes congratulations. Get busy. I have been working on a technology that will take many delivery vehicles off the road. By delivering medical film via the internet. The fax, email and electronic billing has almost put the post office out of business. If we could get advertising agencies to stop mailing trash to people and have a method for the poorer people to pay their bills electronically that would just about put the post office out of business. Removing a whole fleet of vehicles off the road. The banks no longer move truck loads of checks from one bank to another. They scan the checks and electronically send them to the other banks. Again removing a fairly large fleet from the road. Things are happening. I am not delusional and think its because the bankers want to be green. At least not that kind of green. They do it because its cheaper.

Google is replacing a huge number of computers with new low energy computers they use less than 1/4 the power of the old systems. Green or profit margin. In Google's case I think a little of both or at least thats what I hope.

If you don't have the capability to move mountains to completely change things over night you should do your part no matter how little that is. If everyone was to  save 10% of their energy usage across 300 million people in the US that would be huge. I was able to reduce my usage by 50%. Oh and for the corporations. Well if I dont buy as much they don't waste as much of their resources. My electric car gave a 1985 Fiero a second life. Therefore reducing its carbon foot print.

I have worked in the medical field for years in the past there was huge amounts of garbage because everything needed to be sterile. Now hospitals recycle almost 80% of their waste. Our economy is not based on waste. It is based on profit. Waste is becoming expensive and cutting into the profit margin. Companies are recycling more than ever. Still not good enough but much more than they did 30 years ago.

I know capitalism is not sustainable. To expect economic growth year after year when the population growth is flat or reducing is plain stupid. The only way you can expect it is to get people they need more and or manufacture stuff where it breaks. Even then economic growth will hit a peak and flatten out. Uncontrolled capitalism will eventually consume itself. We can slow it down by consuming less. Hopefully we will be rational beings and put people in power that will understand what is truly needed. I have very little hope for the US and the republican party. They want to gut all regulations that slow the money making. I can only hope for the democrats. At least they are not going to gut anything just keep status quo and changes will happen a little more slowly. Although its not just the US its China, Canada, Europe... The rest of the world that needs to change as well. 

I have looked into an interesting project called the Venus project. I like the concept it turns our economy on its head and moves towards a resource based economy. Dumps capitalism completely. I have two issues with it... How do we get from here to there and how do we deal with humans.

Until we can achieve utopia we all need to do our part. It does have an effect on the big picture. There are technologies that can be developed. To help our environment we need to get moving and convince people they are worth while. Sitting back and telling the governments we need change will not work unless it gets them elected you just look like the fringe and get ignored. I know of over 6000 vehicles that have gotten a second life and have greatly reduced their carbon foot print. 

Without practical solutions nothing gets done. The end goal is to change the world one person at a time. It is a changing for the better are you part of that change or part of the problem?

Comment by TNT666 on March 14, 2012 at 11:14am

For me the main solution is to change our economy and infrastructure. We have politicians promising to curb energy requirements and pollution, but as long as our economy is set to GROWTH, all the garbage (figuratively) we produce will continue to ... well ... grow.

The other item I usually insist on conveying in environmental policies is taking the emphasis off individual behaviours, which cause people to guilt trip and lead to anxiety. Even if we all drove drove electric cars and turned off the water while brushing our teeth, it would not make a SIGNIFICANT difference in the global state of our environment. For 90% of water consumption is corporate consumption, and any car which is manufactured with planned obsolescence has its own carbon footprint. Our entire economy is based on resource wastage, and until that fundamental is changed, we will not see any turn around in our consumption and pollution patterns. Personally, I am not interested in any project which just 'slows things down a tad'. I'm interested in profound changes... not "for the children of tomorrow" but for those humans alive today!

Comment by Sentient Biped on March 14, 2012 at 11:09am

Guy, your  message is inspirational!  I try to consider energy conservation and environment much of the time, but often I don't know what choices are better.  Most often on the internet, I use either my Kindle or Netbook.  In the dark.  We keep the heat turned down - sometimes I use an electric blanket instead of turning up the heat.  We have a water barrel, but it doesn't supply a lot of our gardening need.  I often obtain used items (clothes, cooking utensils) at yard and estate sales, and goodwill.   I use reusable grocery bags.  I prefer the canvas or denim ones.  One day I will learn how to use a sewing machine and make my own from used materials.

Comment by Guy on March 14, 2012 at 9:53am

Hello all. I am new to this group. Just briefly looking around. My father got me to start recycling cans and bottles back in the 60s. I fell off the wagon during my first years of leaving home but now I look at how to recycle much more effectively. City programs really help. I also got tired of paying for gas so I converted a car to electric. Both saving on CO2 output and recycling an older 85 Fiero. Oh I also live in the northwest which has the advantage of hydro. In the process I turned off a lot of computer servers at my home adding to my energy savings almost 50%. Running a computer 24 hours a day 7 days a week requires around 272 KWH per month or $30 a month. There is a cost to run the internet. We dont want it to go away So we need to have alternatives. Newer computer designs can reduce the power costs by 50%. As you can see I am dedicated to our environment.

One thing I hope to see here is discussion of reasonable alternatives to what we are currently doing. I love to see reinforcement of my reasons why I try to change my habits. We need to have real world alternatives as well as the whys. Until we come up with reasonable methods to get other people to change their habits and create business models that are sound we will be considered the a fringe element. Even though we need to be the main stream.

Why faithers are not taking up the cause when they have been designated the "Stewards of all things". Well is simple ignorance on their part. Or they are waiting to be absolved when their god comes back. If I were god and saw what a mess they have created in my name I would cry and ask what in the world were you thinking. Then take all of the rational people away from this planet to a new planet of paradise. Ahh science fiction the infinite possibilities.

So what more can I do to help my world? I know there is more. I like the idea of a few new neighborhoods in I think in Sweden. They have smart meters and they compete to have the lowest carbon foot print in their neighborhood.

Comment by Chris G on March 12, 2012 at 3:48am

Chuckle.

Glyphosate is touted by whom as being one of the less-bad weed bombs... Monsanto? It seems that there is more information about its harmful effects in the foreign press. Apparently Monsanto has done a good job suppressing information in the U.S.

Comment by Sentient Biped on March 11, 2012 at 4:24pm

Chris, thanks for commenting.  So now I can just go outside and pee on the dandelions and crabgrass, and the roundup in my urine will kill them?  It's strange - glyphosate is often touted as being one of the less-bad weed bombs, biodegradable and pseudonatural.  

Comment by Chris G on March 11, 2012 at 12:50am

Will Round Up ever be banned?

Glyphosate in Monsanto's Roundup Impacting Global health

recent study conducted by a German university found very high concentrations of Glyphosate, a carcinogenic chemical found in herbicides like Monsanto’s Roundup, in all urine samples tested. The amount of glyphosate found in the urine was staggering, with each sample containing concentrations at 5 to 20-fold the limit established for drinking water. This is just one more piece of evidence that herbicides are, at the very least, being sprayed out of control.

This news comes only one month after it was found that glyphosate, contained in Monsanto’s Roundup, is contaminating the groundwater in the areas in which it is used. What does this mean? It means that toxic glyphosate is now polluting the world’s drinking water through the widespread contamination of aquifers, wells and springs. The recent reports of glyphosate showing up in all urine samples only enhances these past findings.

more here
 

Members (331)

 
 
 

Support Atheist Nexus

Donate Today

Donate

 

Help Nexus When You Buy From Amazon

Amazon

AJY

 

© 2014   Atheist Nexus. All rights reserved. Admin: Richard Haynes.

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service