Worst Thing Said This Week: Rush Limbaugh Wins in This Category

At the memorial service in Tucson on Wednesday night, President Obama delivered a moving speech -- one of the best of his political career -- and fulfilled the role of leader. He called on Americans to debate our policy and political differences with honesty and respect, noting that "a more civil and honest public discourse can help us face up to the challenges of our nation." It is the president's job to inspire and encourage what Abraham Lincoln described as "the better angels of our nature."

But the problem that remains and confounds is this: What happens when someone doesn't play by these rules? It is rather tough to have the sort of discourse the president rightfully urges with a party that engages in name-calling and tosses about extreme and violent rhetoric. And when such a person or institution earns a profit from that sort of behavior, it is especially difficult to nudge him or it toward better-nature territory.

With that in mind, allow me -- respectfully -- to point out what was possibly the worst thing said this week by a major player in the national discourse. No, it's not Sarah Palin's "blood libel" remark. As I've pointed out elsewhere, she was wrong and off-base in so many ways. After all, for Palin to equate the criticism she received after the Tucson rampage (for having marked Rep. Gabrielle Giffords district with cross-hairs on a list of Democrats she targeted for defeat in November) with the genocidal persecution of an entire people demonstrated either ignorance or narcissism. Or both. (My hunch: She didn't know what "blood libel" meant and thought it was just a visceral way to say really libel-y.) Still, this comment was a silly charge that only undermined Palin's argument that her foes on the left had rushed to tie her directly to the massacre before the full facts were known.

Surpassing Palin in debasing the debate this week was none other than Rush Limbaugh. I know, you're shocked. On his radio show, Limbaugh declared,

What Mr. Loughner knows is that he has the full support of a major political party in this country. He's sitting there in jail. He knows what's going on, he knows that. . . . The Democrat party is attempting to find anybody but him to blame. He knows if he plays his cards right, he's just a victim. . . . That smiling mug shot -- this guy clearly understands he's getting all the attention and he understands he's got a political party doing everything it can, plus a local sheriff doing everything that they can to make sure he's not convicted of murder -- but something lesser."

 

Read the rest on Politics Daily.

Tags: Gabrielle Giffords, Rush Limbaugh, WTF, conspiracy, democrats, hate speech, nonsense, nutjob, politics, republicans

Views: 16

Replies to This Discussion

Rush Limbaugh is nothing more than an overpaid, idiotic, sensationalist darling of the TEA nuts. Anyone who believes/agrees with him is just as loony.
And loony they are! How do you think he's been kept in business all these years?
As soon as the doctors finish their "psych eval" on Loughner they should turn their attention to Limbaugh to declare him mentally unbalanced as well (which he clearly is). BTW, if it were up to me there would be no such thing as "innocent by reason of insanity or mental defect".
I agree what sane person kills another in cold blood, what sane person burns another's house down, what sane person rapes another?

Crime is insane, and that includes the white collar type of the Big Corporations against the middle class.
Rush seems to pull the stuff that he says out of his ass! we can hope all we want that his words vanish into thin air, but what those words of his do is they become fuel for crazy fundies.
He doesn't pull it out of his ass, it is just that the crap comes out of the wrong orifice.

RSS

Support Atheist Nexus

Donate Today

Donate

 

Help Nexus When You Buy From Amazon

Amazon

AJY

 

© 2014   Atheist Nexus. All rights reserved. Admin: Richard Haynes.

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service