
The "CLIMATE CONCERNS" group is dedicated to discussion regarding the topic of the ever present and serious issue of changes to our climate due to the introduction into the atmosphere of human induced effects which prove harmful to the environment and which eventually may prove destructive to our planet.
Members: 33
Latest Activity: on Monday
Started by Joan Denoo. Last reply by Loren Miller on Monday. 7 Replies 0 Likes
"Latest reading: 400.15 ppmCO2 concentration on May 19, 2013""Concentrations of the greenhouse gas carbon dioxide in the global atmosphere are approaching 400 parts per million (ppm) for the first…Continue
Started by Steph S.. Last reply by Steph S. on Monday. 4 Replies 2 Likes
It’s easy to forget that…Continue
Started by Joan Denoo. Last reply by Dr. Allan H. Clark on Monday. 1 Reply 0 Likes
Quantifying the consensus on anthropogenic global warming in the scientific literature"We analyze the evolution of…Continue
Started by Ruth Anthony-Gardner. Last reply by Joan Denoo on Monday. 6 Replies 0 Likes
Patent filing claims solar energy ‘breakthrough’Ronald Ace has filed…Continue
Comment
Comment by Secular Forces 2013 on October 23, 2012 at 11:42pm and the Lotus TriFuel is interesting imho
Comment by Secular Forces 2013 on October 23, 2012 at 11:42pm
Comment by Ruth Anthony-Gardner on October 16, 2012 at 11:30pm Nitrogen cars? Apparently compressed nitrogen might be more practical than hydrogen to transfer energy into our cars, and it refuels the car much faster than electric.
Difference Engine: End of the electric car?
Liquid nitrogen ... can store more energy per unit volume, allowing cars to travel further on a tankful of the stuff. Weight for weight, liquid nitrogen packs much the same energy as the lithium-ion batteries used in laptops, mobile phones and electric cars. In terms of performance and range, then, a nitrogen vehicle is similar to an electric vehicle rather than a conventional one.
Comment by Ruth Anthony-Gardner on October 12, 2012 at 12:51am
Comment by Ruth Anthony-Gardner on October 3, 2012 at 4:13pm
Comment by Dr. Allan H. Clark on October 3, 2012 at 11:05am Senator Inhofe has been one of the most conservative members of the Senate since his election in 1994. He is very religious and has based his support of Israel on God's word in the Bible. His opposition to climate change is also Biblically based—he thinks it is arrogant for humans to believe they can influence the climate while God is still in his heaven. The man is stupid beyond belief—even for a Republican senator.
Comment by Ruth Anthony-Gardner on October 3, 2012 at 10:37am Senator James Inhofe, famous for denouncing Climate Change as a hoax, admits that he used to believe Climate Change was true, until he learned how much it would cost to fight it.
Inhofe: Global warming too costly to be real
In short, learning about the (supposed) high cost of the solution is what turned him from a believer in climate science to a denier.
Would he also decide that a cancer diagnosis is wrong if the treatment was too expensive?
Comment by Ruth Anthony-Gardner on September 30, 2012 at 5:44pm
Comment by Ruth Anthony-Gardner on September 30, 2012 at 4:52pm
Comment by Ruth Anthony-Gardner on September 30, 2012 at 4:21pm
Angela commented on Randall Smith's blog post The Rednecks are coming, the Rednecks are coming
Debra Stevenson commented on Ruth Anthony-Gardner's group Hang With Friends
Rachel Riley commented on blue pashmina's blog post Not believing in an afterlife does not mean i am a "sad' person.
Tom Sarbeck commented on Randall Smith's blog post The Rednecks are coming, the Rednecks are coming
Heather Henderson posted a blog post© 2013 Atheist Nexus. All rights reserved. Admin: Richard Haynes.


You need to be a member of Climate Concerns to add comments!