A Harvard researcher blames big environmental organizations which worked with corporations of political malpractice, namely for underestimating the power of right wing think tanks to sway public opinion. Accusing the well meaning but naive big environmental groups, she seems to consider Obama, the right wing think tanks, and their corporate sponsors without responsibility for Climate Destabilization.

While her failure analysis of the big environmental groups' strategy may be correct, in my opinion that hardly justifies ignoring the chief opponents of sustainability and their political stooges.

Climate change inaction the fault of environmental groups, report says

A Harvard academic has put the blame squarely for America's failure to act on climate change on environmental groups. She also argues that there is little prospect Barack Obama will put climate change on the top of his agenda in his second term.

In a research paper, due to be presented at a Harvard forum next month, scholar Theda Skocpol in effect accuses the DC-based environmental groups of political malpractice, saying they were blind to extreme Republican opposition to their efforts.

... the US Climate Action Partnership, which Skocpol describes as a coalition of "CEOs and Big Enviro honchos" ...

... overlooked how the political reality outside clubby Washington had turned against their cause. Skocpol attributes much of that shift to the well-funded effort by conservative thinktanks to undermine climate science.

Skocpol's recommendations for environmental groups are stark. "Climate change warriors will have to look beyond elite manoeuvres and find ways to address the values and interests of tens and millions of US citizens," she writes.

"Reformers will have to build organizational networks across the country, and they will need to orchestrate sustained political efforts that stretch far beyond friendly congressional offices, comfy board rooms, and posh retreats."

She concludes: "The only way to counter such right wing elite and popular forces is to build a broad popular movement to tackle climate change."

Climate activist Bill McKibben said Skocpol's analysis mirrored his experiences in building the grassroots organisation 350.org.

"Basically, we need a movement, and we need something a movement can get behind," he said in an email. "Something people as compared to corporations might care about."

Tags: Climate Change, Climate Destabilization, US Climate Action Partnership

Views: 38

Support Atheist Nexus

Donate Today

Donate

 

Help Nexus When You Buy From Amazon

Amazon

 

Latest Activity

Randall Smith replied to Ruth Anthony-Gardner's discussion In 40 years wild vertebrates halved in the group Wildlife
6 minutes ago
Todd Crispin replied to Todd Crispin's discussion New member, first post anywhere of this type
1 hour ago
Jennie updated their profile
1 hour ago
Jennie posted a photo
1 hour ago
Todd Crispin posted discussions
1 hour ago
mark fitzgibbon liked Ivy's group Atheist Humor
2 hours ago
mark fitzgibbon posted a status
"giving my daughter breakfast :)"
4 hours ago
mark fitzgibbon updated their profile
4 hours ago
mark fitzgibbon replied to Todd Crispin's discussion New member, first post anywhere of this type
4 hours ago
mark fitzgibbon liked Todd Crispin's discussion New member, first post anywhere of this type
4 hours ago
abdulrahman aliyu posted a status
"How I wish things were different....... And I am in open society, not living in the midst of Muslims and couldn't express my views openly."
4 hours ago
Joan Denoo commented on Daniel W's group Food!
4 hours ago

© 2014   Atheist Nexus. All rights reserved. Admin: Richard Haynes.

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service