Christians and how they deal with atheist chat

Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by Jason Ferguson on April 20, 2009 at 5:44pm

I think Ned Flanders (AKA Bill) may have some doubts about his faith but is afraid to admit it. Maybe hes just feeling ateists out to see if he can be one. He hasnt proselytized or even come up with what he calls evidence. He says "I agree that there's absolutely no proof - nothing close to it. But in my judgment there's certainly evidence." Several folks have asked what evidence he has and yet he has produced nothing.(Sound familiar?) He has definatley stirred us up a bit online but I agree that we should have a place to express our thoughts without being rude.
When Brian posted the Flanders video I lost it! Perfect Video.

▶ Reply to This

Permalink Reply by Jim C. on April 21, 2009 at 12:28pm

You have to state that you're an atheist to join this site so why not?

Or something about being atheist/agnostic for the CAA.

Yeah, Bill seems to have an agenda. He might not be aware of it but his long, rambling posts have all the earmarks of "the thin end of the wedge." First he gets us to admit that there might have been an historical Jesus and then it takes off from there.

▶ Reply to This

Permalink Reply by Jason Ferguson on April 21, 2009 at 1:28pm

And if a theist lies about it, they go to hell! Its perfect! I just wonder what he might say to his buddies if we give hime the boot. Not sure if I care either.

▶ Reply to This

Permalink Reply by Jason Ferguson on April 21, 2009 at 1:31pm

▶ Reply to This

Permalink Reply by Jim C. on July 15, 2009 at 1:02pm

OK, maybe I'm hypersensitive to this sort of thing (dealing with it as much as I do) but what's up with this Micah Israel guy? Is he a religious zealot hiding in the guise of an atheist or is he an atheist who just likes to stir things up with a big stick?

He has all the earmarks of the first:
Long, meandering posts
Adherence to certain texts to prove his point
Non-sequiturs in debate

In his profile, under interests, it simple says, "Bible".

Any ideas of what he is and how he should be dealt with?

▶ Reply to This

Permalink Reply by Sam Chapman on August 24, 2009 at 9:05pm

Sorry guys but I didn't know I was susposed to read their posts. I've just been ignoring them. You'll have to insist that I read them before I'll start. CAA should be a "clubhouse" for us so we should be able to control our membership. But, requiring a statement of "lack of faith" likely won't stop a xtian from lying to get in the gang. It's not like ethics have stopped them before (e.g. Regan; Bush I, BushII, Ted Haggard; Dick Armey, Dick Cheney, etc, etc, etc.)

So, I say ignore them for now and vote in the near future as to whether to start a requirement. I've never read nor responded to one of their posts, nor ever will; I would speculate that joining this group is a little like self-flagellation for them. A way to show JC how they've suffered thru the slings and arrows of the godless heathens to better understand them (us.)

▶ Reply to This

Permalink Reply by William C. Walker on September 13, 2009 at 8:42pm

In a word--NO

▶ Reply to This

Permalink Reply by William C. Walker on September 30, 2009 at 8:59pm

Hi, I like the idea of a 'haven' for us Atheists. Zeus knows christians are in our face whichever way we turn. I'm an 'activist' & have been for decades, letters t5o the editor, bumper-stickers,membership in American Atheists, Freedom From Religion Foundatioon, Americans United for Separation of Church7 State, & MAAF. Would like to chat, exchange thoughts, experiences. Rather new to the computer & typing, but two years older than dirt.

▶ Reply to This