Chariots of Iron


Chariots of Iron

"And the LORD was with Judah; and he drave out the inhabitants of the mountain; but could not drive out the inhabitants of the valley, because they had chariots of iron." -- Judges 1:19

Location: United States
Members: 684
Latest Activity: Jun 9

Chariots of Iron PodCast Information

Subscribe: Zune Link | iTunes Link | MP3 Feed | OGG Feed
Don't forget to visit us on Facebook, or you can contact us directly at

Discussion Forum

The future of the Chariots of Iron

Started by Lamar. Last reply by matt warren Nov 6, 2012. 8 Replies

No Wikipedia Page?!

Started by Andrew Lindsey. Last reply by Eli Feb 7, 2011. 4 Replies

Comment Wall


You need to be a member of Chariots of Iron to add comments!

Comment by Lamar on April 27, 2009 at 3:38am
"You guys have given me the courage to admit to myseld an others that I am an atheist."

Few statements could flatter me more. This is the reason we do this show, ninorojo. Thanks for sharing; it made my day.
Comment by ninorojo on April 26, 2009 at 3:01pm
Hey just wanted to say that I love the podcast! Im from the Uk and just recently found out about it. I started right from the first show and am working my way through one at a time. Its the only thing that keeps me going at work! you guys have given me the courage to admit to myseld an others that I am an atheist. Keep up the great work.
Comment by Amanda (Freckles) on April 15, 2009 at 8:18am
Juuuust like him ;-)
Comment by moJoe on April 15, 2009 at 1:03am
I am the one that sounds like James Earl Jones.
Comment by Amanda (Freckles) on April 14, 2009 at 11:52am
Hi Eli (the other one)! Thanks!
Comment by Eli on April 14, 2009 at 11:49am
The southern accent would be Lamar, I'm the "other one".
Comment by Amanda (Freckles) on April 14, 2009 at 11:47am
I just started listening with episode 25. I have Joe's voice down from AtheistNews podcast. Who has the slightly southern accent Lamar or Eli?

I'm hooked - thanks!
Comment by Eli on March 31, 2009 at 2:06pm
I'll have to check that out, however, I would argue that "scientific" as defined by modern terms would not be the use of any disciplined methodology but that of the the scientific method (a specific methodology), thus Theology may be functional, methodological and rational, but that does not mean it is "scientific" (and I would debate that it is not rational as most theology I've encountered is based on a irrational foundation.

The example I use is you could say my attempt to invade Italy is "rational" based on my belief that I am Napoleon Bonaparte.
Comment by Pat on March 31, 2009 at 1:55pm
In the 1968 edition of the Encyclopaedia on the subject of Theology "Theology as a Science" article it states " Yet theology is fully entitled to be called "scientific" if by this one means that it has a prescribed function, a disciplined methodology and a rational structure.'

Can anyone explain what this is suppose to mean?
Comment by moJoe on February 26, 2009 at 5:00am
100! Kapow!

Members (681)


© 2014   Atheist Nexus. All rights reserved. Admin: Richard Haynes.

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service