Everyone knows that birds sing songs to communicate with each other. Different songs are used to warn other of predators, attract mates, and find food. But how far do these songs really go? How complex are birds' languages? Well, as some scientists have found out, they're more complex than people think.

Bird.jpg

Parrots especially have been studied for their extreme vocal abilities, able to mimic nearly every sound they hear. But they don't just mimic. They also have a language and words of their own. Parrots have been recorded using specific sounds to get other parrots' attention. As it turns out, these sounds are the parrots' names. That's right, parrots have specific, individual names. A study by Cornell University on wild parrots in Venezuela showed that the parent parrot (try saying that five times fast) actually names their children. Parrots name their children just like humans name theirs.

Parrot.jpg

But it's not just parrots that have intricate workings to their songs. Bengal finches actually have grammar and syntax to their songs, and they get pissy if it's wrong. Researchers at Kyoto University recorded some of these finches' songs and mixed them up. When they played them back to the finches, they threw a fit. They played the song to a different group of finches, who also reacted in the same way. It turns out that these birds have some strict grammar rules and don't like it when they're messed up.

http://blog.lib.umn.edu/stoe0062/psy_1001%20section%2021%20spring%2...

Views: 3

Support Atheist Nexus

Donate Today

Donate

 

Help Nexus When You Buy From Amazon

Amazon

MJ

Latest Activity

Napoleon Bonaparte replied to Gene Sokolowski's discussion Great New Book: Taking Liberties: Why Religious Freedom Doesn't Give You the Right to Tell Other People What to Do
10 minutes ago
Joan Denoo replied to Idaho Spud's discussion Utah's Governor Grinch in the group LGBTQI atheists, nontheists, and friends
13 minutes ago
sk8eycat replied to James M. Martin's discussion Neil DeGrasse Tyson on Why "Cosmos" Will NOT be Accompanied by Creationist Explanation for...well...the Cosmos
16 minutes ago
sk8eycat replied to James M. Martin's discussion Neil DeGrasse Tyson on Why "Cosmos" Will NOT be Accompanied by Creationist Explanation for...well...the Cosmos
31 minutes ago
Joan Denoo replied to Gene Sokolowski's discussion Great New Book: Taking Liberties: Why Religious Freedom Doesn't Give You the Right to Tell Other People What to Do
48 minutes ago
Joan Denoo replied to Gene Sokolowski's discussion Great New Book: Taking Liberties: Why Religious Freedom Doesn't Give You the Right to Tell Other People What to Do
48 minutes ago
Joan Denoo replied to Gene Sokolowski's discussion Great New Book: Taking Liberties: Why Religious Freedom Doesn't Give You the Right to Tell Other People What to Do
53 minutes ago
Joan Denoo liked Gene Sokolowski's discussion Great New Book: Taking Liberties: Why Religious Freedom Doesn't Give You the Right to Tell Other People What to Do
54 minutes ago
Joan Denoo replied to Gene Sokolowski's discussion ALL Politicians Should Be Made to Read: "Homosexuality, atheism etc: What's it to you?"
1 hour ago
Mike Mitchell commented on Mike Mitchell's blog post Why You Shouldn’t Announce Your Atheism
1 hour ago
Tom Sarbeck posted a discussion
1 hour ago
Joan Denoo replied to matthew greenberg's discussion Kansas "Religious Liberty" bill
1 hour ago

© 2014   Atheist Nexus. All rights reserved. Admin: Richard Haynes.

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service