Good article from Birds.com

It will help you to identify the many Sandpipers.

Plus remember your field guide. I use Sibley.

 

Sandpipers are familiar to most birdwatchers. Yet their identification can be very frustrating. Most sandpipers are feathered in browns or soft grays, and gather in flocks that contain many species. Some are distinctively patterned, but others are so similar even experienced birders have trouble identifying them.

 

An important clue to identifying sandpipers is their bill shape. Most species have unique bill shapes, which help them specialize in capturing certain foods.

For instance, Sanderlings have very short bills compared to other sandpipers. It’s the perfect bill for grabbing tiny crustaceans that sit on the surface of the sand, when waves recede. Another sandpiper, the Dunlin, has a medium-length bill. This bill can probe a bit into the mud or sand, down to where little worms and insect larvae live. The Dowitcher’s bill is even longer- it can access worms that are out of the Dunlin’s reach. A Curlew, with its 9-inch-long, curving bill, gets the deepest prey of all- and the curve of the bill helps reach into crooked worm burrows.

Then there is the Avocet, whose unique, delicate bill turns up towards the tip. The Avocet uses it as a scythe. It swings it along the surface of the water, stirring up the mud and snapping up tiny crustaceans. The Turnstone’s bill is also upswept, but is much sturdier than the Avocet’s. The Turnstone uses it to flip over stones and beach debris, revealing the tiny prey hiding underneath.

All these different bill shapes can help the birdwatcher tell sandpipers apart. They also allow the birds to feed side by side- each species finding its own particular niche of food.

 

 

http://www.birds.com/blog/a-hint-for-identifying-sandpipers/

Views: 19

Support Atheist Nexus

Donate Today

Donate

 

Help Nexus When You Buy From Amazon

Amazon

AJY

 

Latest Activity

Bertold Brautigan joined Sentient Biped's group
1 minute ago
Bertold Brautigan replied to Grinning Cat's discussion Supreme Court increasingly accepting unverified "facts" from amicus briefs in the group Justice For All
1 minute ago
Bertold Brautigan replied to Sentient Biped's discussion Getting Speech Straight - "Homosexual" is not an LGBT-friendly term in the group LGBTQI atheists, nontheists, and friends
3 minutes ago
Loren Miller replied to Grinning Cat's discussion Supreme Court increasingly accepting unverified "facts" from amicus briefs in the group Justice For All
6 minutes ago
Bertold Brautigan posted a discussion
9 minutes ago
Idaho Spud liked Grinning Cat's discussion Supreme Court increasingly accepting unverified "facts" from amicus briefs
11 minutes ago
Pat replied to Sentient Biped's discussion All of the christian religion in one tweet
13 minutes ago
Luara replied to Sentient Biped's discussion Getting Speech Straight - "Homosexual" is not an LGBT-friendly term in the group LGBTQI atheists, nontheists, and friends
13 minutes ago
Grinning Cat added a discussion to the group Justice For All
14 minutes ago
Bertold Brautigan replied to Sentient Biped's discussion All of the christian religion in one tweet
24 minutes ago
Loren Miller replied to Sentient Biped's discussion All of the christian religion in one tweet
27 minutes ago
Bertold Brautigan replied to Sentient Biped's discussion Getting Speech Straight - "Homosexual" is not an LGBT-friendly term in the group LGBTQI atheists, nontheists, and friends
28 minutes ago

© 2014   Atheist Nexus. All rights reserved. Admin: Richard Haynes.

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service