A group for science enthusiasts of all types -- professionals, amateurs, students, anybody who loves science.
Members: 1576
Latest Activity: on Friday
Started by John Jubinsky. Last reply by Lillie on Friday. 1 Reply 0 Likes
Started by John Jubinsky. Last reply by Luara Apr 27. 6 Replies 0 Likes
Started by Joan Denoo. Last reply by Vulpes Apr 20. 8 Replies 2 Likes
Started by Ruth Anthony-Gardner. Last reply by Idaho Spud Apr 11. 3 Replies 0 Likes
Started by Ruth Anthony-Gardner. Last reply by Future Mar 27. 3 Replies 0 Likes
Started by Ruth Anthony-Gardner. Last reply by Joan Denoo Mar 24. 1 Reply 0 Likes
Started by Joan Denoo. Last reply by Humble Pie Mar 24. 1 Reply 1 Like
Started by Ruth Anthony-Gardner. Last reply by Joan Denoo Mar 18. 1 Reply 1 Like
Started by Loren Miller. Last reply by Joan Denoo Mar 18. 6 Replies 3 Likes
Comment
Comment by Tony Carroll on September 6, 2012 at 12:27pm
Comment by Idaho Spud on September 5, 2012 at 7:12pm Excellent. Thanks Ruth.
Comment by Ruth Anthony-Gardner on September 5, 2012 at 6:52pm
Comment by Chris G on September 3, 2012 at 5:27pm Romney panders to to the anti-science Republican base with a
Exclusive: At the Republican National Convention and on the campaign trail, Mitt Romney has come up with a new laugh line, mocking President Obama’s policies to slow global warming. In doing so, Romney distorts a quote from an Obama speech in 2008 about ocean levels, reports Robert Parry.
By Robert Parry
Republican presidential nominee Mitt Romney has offered few details about how he would run the U.S. government, but he has made clear one thing about his environmental views: he has contempt for President Barack Obama’s efforts to promote alternative energy and combat global warming.
Fitting with the new Republican orthodoxy that climate-change science is either a hoax or hysteria, Romney has incorporated into his speeches a joke about Obama’s interest in protecting the environment, a sure-fire laugh line for the GOP faithful.
In his acceptance speech on Thursday, Romney said, “President Obama promised to begin to slow the rise of the oceans (pause for mocking laughter) and heal the planet. MY promise is to help you and your family.”
Romney apparently was so thrilled with the success of his new “joke” that he repeated it while on a post-convention campaign swing. In Cincinnati, Ohio, on Saturday, he elicited more laughs from the crowd when he claimed Obama “famously said he was going to slow the rise of the oceans.” Romney added, “Our promise to you is this: we’re going to help the American people.”
Not surprisingly, Romney’s recitation of what Obama said isn’t correct. Obama never said “he was going to slow the rise of the oceans,” but rather he said – in his June 4, 2008, victory speech after clinching the Democratic nomination – that “the American people,” i.e. by changing policies and leaders, would look back at this moment as the time “the rise of the oceans began to slow and our planet began to heal.”
But more important than Romney’s rhetorical exaggeration is that his ridicule of global-warming again counterpoises that longer-term existential threat against the short-term interests of today’s voters, suggesting that President Romney would ignore the former in favor of the latter.
more here
Comment by Idaho Spud on September 3, 2012 at 3:42pm Wow! The Texas Republican party's education platform is incredibly horrible.
Comment by Diane on September 3, 2012 at 1:49pm
Comment by Diane on September 3, 2012 at 1:23pm ... false evidence of failing school ... with the agenda of privatizing schools ...
A tangent, but relevant to "neocon / religious right agendas":
This summer the Republican Party of Texas opposed the teaching of critical thinking skills in their party platform because they "have the purpose of challenging the student's fixed beliefs and undermining parental authority."
There's much more scary stuff at a Washington Post article, including the full education section of their platform.
(A left-wing conspiracy theorist could postulate that the Koch brothers et al. want a two-tiered educational system designed to leave the 99.9% unthinking and submissive!)
Lillie replied to Steph S.'s discussion The Mystery of the "Immaculately" Conceived Baby Anteater in the group Wildlife
Dr. Allan H. Clark replied to Dr. Allan H. Clark's discussion Unforessen consequence of Obamacare
Lillie replied to Steph S.'s discussion 'Crazy ants' a threat in southern U.S. in the group Hang With Friends
Lillie replied to Steph S.'s discussion 'Crazy ants' a threat in southern U.S. in the group Hang With Friends
Lillie replied to Steph S.'s discussion 'Crazy ants' a threat in southern U.S. in the group Hang With Friends© 2013 Atheist Nexus. All rights reserved. Admin: Brother Richard.
You need to be a member of Atheists who love Science! to add comments!