Just found this I haven't had time to look deeper into it, but I thought I'd share.

Journal: Study linking vaccine to autism was fraud

 

Tags: Autism, Fraud, MMR, Vaccine

Views: 7

Replies to This Discussion

Why is this news now?  He was discredited months ago.
The trouble with this "somebody made money on this, therefore it is suspect" argument is that it is a logical fallacy, attacking the motive. Let us say that you had it in mind to make a vaccine? Would you do it for free? How much time would you devote? How much equipment would you personally purchase? Furthermore, the argument is faulty at its core. Are all teachers suspect because they get a paycheck? Do you question the motives of your favorite music artist because he/she sells songs? In reality, no one gets rich off of vaccines, which account for only a tiny part of the big pharma profits. The real money is in maintenance medicines (those people have to take regularly for long periods of time) and redundant medicines for popular ailments (such as new allergy medicines that are no more effective than the old ones that are now generic). This is why most pharmaceuticals have stopped manufacturing vaccines.
Bruce - I'm sorry, but it is not really all that different an argument. "Big pharma makes money and uses it to hide the truth" is just a variation since the claim is that they make money off the thing they want to hide the truth about. It still amounts to an attacking the motive fallacy. And if you are demanding evidence as part of all this, what is the evidence of this big pharma conspiracy of hiding the truth? Furthermore, I do not equivocate. The point I was making with the teachers and musicians comparison had to do with the basic idea that money turns anything someone does automatically suspect, which is a crucial point to your argument.

RSS

Support Atheist Nexus

Donate Today

Donate

 

Help Nexus When You Buy From Amazon

Amazon

AJY

 

Latest Activity

Grinning Cat replied to Grinning Cat's discussion Supreme Court increasingly accepting unverified "facts" from amicus briefs in the group Justice For All
1 minute ago
Bertold Brautigan joined Sentient Biped's group
2 minutes ago
Bertold Brautigan replied to Grinning Cat's discussion Supreme Court increasingly accepting unverified "facts" from amicus briefs in the group Justice For All
2 minutes ago
Bertold Brautigan replied to Sentient Biped's discussion Getting Speech Straight - "Homosexual" is not an LGBT-friendly term in the group LGBTQI atheists, nontheists, and friends
4 minutes ago
Loren Miller replied to Grinning Cat's discussion Supreme Court increasingly accepting unverified "facts" from amicus briefs in the group Justice For All
7 minutes ago
Bertold Brautigan posted a discussion
10 minutes ago
Idaho Spud liked Grinning Cat's discussion Supreme Court increasingly accepting unverified "facts" from amicus briefs
12 minutes ago
Pat replied to Sentient Biped's discussion All of the christian religion in one tweet
14 minutes ago
Luara replied to Sentient Biped's discussion Getting Speech Straight - "Homosexual" is not an LGBT-friendly term in the group LGBTQI atheists, nontheists, and friends
14 minutes ago
Grinning Cat added a discussion to the group Justice For All
15 minutes ago
Bertold Brautigan replied to Sentient Biped's discussion All of the christian religion in one tweet
25 minutes ago
Loren Miller replied to Sentient Biped's discussion All of the christian religion in one tweet
28 minutes ago

© 2014   Atheist Nexus. All rights reserved. Admin: Richard Haynes.

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service