Scientists at Georgetown University have discovered why broccoli and cauliflower type vegetables fight many types of cancers. About half of all cancers including breast, lung and colon involve a mutation of a particular gene (P53) that results in the cancer cells producing a particular defective protein. Broccoli and cauliflower type vegetables contain an ingredient called isothiocyanate that binds to the defective protein. Moreover, the mutated gene renders the cancer cells vulnerable to the toxic effects of isothiocyanate. The result is that the cancer cells are killed by the ingredient. However, normal cells are resistant to isothiocyanate and isothiocyanate does not bind to the non-defective form of the protein. Accordingly, normal cells are not harmed by the ingredient. The defective protein that accommodates the death of cancer cells by subjecting them to isothiocyanate is protective of them against many other chemotherapies.

http://news.discovery.com/human/how-broccoli-fights-cancer-110310.html

Tags: Breast, Broccoli, Cancer, Cauliflower, Colon, Jubinsky, Lung

Views: 275

Replies to This Discussion

Well, I should be pretty well off, then. I eat about 3 heads of broccoli a month. : )

 

Just started eating broccoflower, too. Ever tried it? It's good.

I like that type of stuff too. It's also low in calories if you don't put dressing on it.

Do other members of the cultivar plants contain the same compounds? 

Apparently cooking to long destroys most of the beneficial proteins, although, steaming for 4 or 5 minutes does not, Of course, raw has the maximum benefit.

Don't tell my daughter! She'll want the suppliment insted of the vegetable!

 

If they come out with the ingredient in supplement form I think a lot of people will opt for it over the vegetable, including me!

RSS

Support Atheist Nexus

Donate Today

Donate

 

Help Nexus When You Buy From Amazon

Amazon

 

Latest Activity

John Jubinsky posted photos
44 minutes ago
Joan Denoo replied to Grinning Cat's discussion Greta Christina: Why Being Liberal Really Is Better Than Being Conservative in the group Politics, Economics, and Religion
2 hours ago
Tom Sarbeck replied to Grinning Cat's discussion Greta Christina: Why Being Liberal Really Is Better Than Being Conservative in the group Politics, Economics, and Religion
3 hours ago
Grinning Cat replied to Grinning Cat's discussion Greta Christina: Why Being Liberal Really Is Better Than Being Conservative in the group Politics, Economics, and Religion
3 hours ago
Luara replied to Daniel W's discussion Are same sex marriages more stable than so-called traditional marriages? in the group LGBTQI atheists, nontheists, and friends
3 hours ago
sk8eycat replied to Joan Denoo's discussion The Bible is not Great by Soren Sagan in the group ORIGINS: UNIVERSE, LIFE, HUMANKIND, AND DARWIN
4 hours ago
Joan Denoo replied to Grinning Cat's discussion Greta Christina on "Why Being Liberal Really Is Better Than Being Conservative" in the group Politics, Economics, and Religion
4 hours ago
Luara replied to Daniel W's discussion Are same sex marriages more stable than so-called traditional marriages? in the group LGBTQI atheists, nontheists, and friends
4 hours ago
sk8eycat replied to Joan Denoo's discussion The Bible is not Great by Soren Sagan in the group ORIGINS: UNIVERSE, LIFE, HUMANKIND, AND DARWIN
4 hours ago
Joan Denoo replied to Grinning Cat's discussion Greta Christina on "Why Being Liberal Really Is Better Than Being Conservative" in the group Politics, Economics, and Religion
4 hours ago
Tom Sarbeck commented on Loren Miller's blog post Is god good?
4 hours ago
Tom Sarbeck replied to jay H's discussion What the freakin hell is wrong with this country???
5 hours ago

© 2014   Atheist Nexus. All rights reserved. Admin: Richard Haynes.

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service