Tags:
Permalink Reply by jim copeland on April 27, 2011 at 3:32am
Permalink Reply by Ben Roth on July 16, 2011 at 7:48pm
Permalink Reply by Joseph P on April 27, 2011 at 7:18am I'm not sure what "unevenly yoked" rules you are talking about.
It's a theistic term. Personally, I find the metaphor absolutely hilarious, particularly considering that it's the theists who use it. It's comparing the believer to an ox/horse and the religion as the cart that they have to drag around. Unevenly ... as in Protestants and Catholics ... liberal Protestants and the whack-a-loons, like the Pentecostals or Southern Baptists.
The term tends to particularly be used by the more fundamentalist sects, in my experience, which seems like a big uh-oh, in this situation. If his girlfriend's church elders would have a problem with someone unevenly yoked, say like a Catholic, I can imagine how they'd feel about the yoke-less.
As for his title question, though? Hell no. When you're marrying someone that you have reservations about, who's pushing for marriage because of the deportation issues you mentioned ... all while she's hopped up on pregnancy hormones. I'd be very careful about it. I have no idea what the alimony laws are like in Canada, but if you make much money, it sounds like a good way for you to get screwed.
Permalink Reply by Joseph P on April 27, 2011 at 7:43am The church still uses the metaphor only in reference to religion, though. The work they're referring to is the religious obligation.
That's very much the sort of thing that the original poster's girlfriend's church was referring to.
And either way, my mockery still stands. Oxen are yoked for the purpose of doing work not to their benefit. It's used as a metaphor in several places in the Bible, always speaking of subservience.
Permalink Reply by RealType on April 27, 2011 at 10:08am I dont really care if the child is raised christian by her. I think the best way to hate the church is experiencing it. I just dont want to get married.
Permalink Reply by David Parker on April 27, 2011 at 7:04pm
Permalink Reply by Craigart14 on May 14, 2011 at 11:45am
Permalink Reply by Tony Lester on June 7, 2011 at 1:53pm
Permalink Reply by Joseph P on June 7, 2011 at 11:11pm
Permalink Reply by TByte on July 18, 2011 at 12:41am The child is his "fault"? Besides not necessarily being true, what a sad view you have of his situation.
"Do the right thing."? The young man is seeking advice on the best course of action. Marriage it NOT necessarily it. Marriage never has, and never will, be able force two parents to become a loving couple.
Joan Denoo replied to Ruth Anthony-Gardner's discussion Cicadas taste like asparagus in the group THE KNIFE & FORK
Lillie replied to Steph S.'s discussion Girl Recovered After 10 Years Claimed Dead by Psychic in the group Hang With Friends
Tom Sarbeck replied to Ruth Anthony-Gardner's discussion Top industries all depend on externalities in the group Politics, Economics, and Religion
Edison Sullivan replied to James M. Martin's discussion Just Because You Are Not a Believer Doesn't Mean They Don't Pray For You
Debra Stevenson commented on Debra Stevenson's blog post Salvation Army and religious charities discriminating© 2013 Atheist Nexus. All rights reserved. Admin: Richard Haynes.

