Tags:
Permalink Reply by AtheistTech on October 30, 2011 at 7:37pm
Permalink Reply by AtheistTech on October 30, 2011 at 8:45pm
Permalink Reply by FernWalker on October 30, 2011 at 8:34pm
Permalink Reply by Kenneth K. Bauer on October 31, 2011 at 4:55am
Permalink Reply by Earther on November 1, 2011 at 8:20pm
Permalink Reply by Earther on November 7, 2011 at 1:49am
Permalink Reply by Dale M. on November 30, 2011 at 7:16pm I love the idea
Not intended as a downer, but being the skeptic that I am ... if everyone in this group signed on for the cruise, we would get enough to half fill a smallish modern cruise ship. ( The Pacific Princess would probably be overflowing, though... ) Would there be advertising elsewhere, to get the word out beyond the Nexus?
If not, I think you'd have to be happy with 20-40 people from here,( show of hands to see if im wrong.....)
100 would be amazing.
So the idea of an exclusive, athiest themed entertainment cruise currently seems far-fetched.
Picking a generic singles cruise that is already planned, and have everyone agree to meet up would be more realistic, maybe less fun. And awkward maybe if only a few show up. (Although, hooking up with a horny christian, and then converting them to the dark side as they lay next to you in your stateroom, there are possibilities....)
There has to be one person here out of 24,000 that works for a cruise line....
Permalink Reply by Earther on December 1, 2011 at 6:13pm You may be right about the numbers but the idea is to have motivation for like minded individuals meet and enjoy the company of atheists. Meaningless sex is just meaningless sex no matter atheist or religious participants. Because atheist and religious relationships are likely to be a long walk with competitive differences it may be desirable to some to have an atheist atheist relationship who may learn to cohabitate and support one another in the everyday dogma of religious perceptions of life. I think if I went on a cruise large or small with all atheist I would learn a lot more about myself than a generic one, sex or no sex included.
Permalink Reply by Joseph Heston on December 30, 2011 at 5:10pm Will Charo be on board?
Tom Sarbeck replied to Ruth Anthony-Gardner's discussion Top industries all depend on externalities in the group Politics, Economics, and Religion
Edison Sullivan replied to James M. Martin's discussion Just Because You Are Not a Believer Doesn't Mean They Don't Pray For You
Debra Stevenson commented on Debra Stevenson's blog post Salvation Army and religious charities discriminating
Debra Stevenson replied to James M. Martin's discussion Republican Candidate Trent Franks and Tony Perkins Compare Repeal of "Roe v. Wade" to End of Slavery
Loren Miller replied to James M. Martin's discussion Just Because You Are Not a Believer Doesn't Mean They Don't Pray For You
Edison Sullivan liked James M. Martin's discussion Just Because You Are Not a Believer Doesn't Mean They Don't Pray For You© 2013 Atheist Nexus. All rights reserved. Admin: Richard Haynes.

