How is this different from a Bigfoot sighting?
Wisconsin site deemed 'holy' by Catholic leaders
The sighting was in 1859. I'm sure just NOW getting around to recognizing it has nothing to do with the current falling of the Catholic PAC.
They really know no shame.
Tags:
Permalink Reply by Ian Mason on February 14, 2011 at 11:26pm
Permalink Reply by Wiley Coyote on February 15, 2011 at 11:14am Hows it different from a Bigfoot sighting?
Bigfoot never claimed to be a virgin? ;)
Permalink Reply by The Secular One on February 15, 2011 at 8:34pm
Loren Miller replied to Debra Stevenson's discussion Humanistic Mormon Bishop's response to Elder's homophobic remark at GC
Kris Leeds commented on Rachel Riley's blog post RAGE! (What I want to say but won't on FB)
Philip Jarrett replied to Anthony Jordan's discussion Poll Shows 29% of Americans Believe Armed Revolution May Become Necessary
Tom Sarbeck replied to Steph S.'s discussion 'Crazy ants' a threat in southern U.S. in the group Hang With Friends
Joan Denoo liked Dallas the Phallus's discussion Tamar Gendler: An Introduction to the Philosophy of Politics and Economics© 2013 Atheist Nexus. All rights reserved. Admin: Brother Richard.