Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by Trance Gemini on September 20, 2009 at 8:31am

I agree. It's time we pulled out the stops to end these despicable crimes against women in the name religion and mythical sky fairies!

Permalink Reply by Gaz Sharman on September 20, 2009 at 9:07am

Anyone who allows or causes male or female circumcision to be inflicted upon their child should be prosecuted to the maximum.

Permalink Reply by OutlawGirl on September 20, 2009 at 4:21pm

Yep. This is mutilation, plain and simple.

Permalink Reply by The Secular One on September 20, 2009 at 5:03pm

Question: would male circumcision fall into the same category to you?

Ugh, I expect this could be a can of worms, but what the heck! =D

Permalink Reply by OutlawGirl on September 21, 2009 at 9:46pm

Yeah!

I read something about this in my critical thinking college course. Apparently there are quite a lot of horrible accidents that have happened as the result of circumcision, some so bad that the doctors suggested the parents raise their son as a girl to avoid the mess! I've heard of potiental benefits to male circumcision but for the moment it sounds like the jury is still out.

The fact that it's done against the child's will is pretty disturbing to me. My step brother was very badly shaken when he realized he'd been circumcised. He thought all boys looked like that from birth. I felt bad for him.

Permalink Reply by The Secular One on September 21, 2009 at 11:48pm

I'd take the argument even further: even if there was a definitive benefit, I don't think it is acceptable. There is a definitive benefit to breast removal, but we aren't doing that anytime soon.

To be fair though, I am circumcised and don't really care either way. I guess it is hard to miss what you never had (in living memory).

Permalink Reply by Trance Gemini on September 22, 2009 at 6:43am

I've heard of potiental benefits to male circumcision but for the moment it sounds like the jury is still out.

Opinions are changing on that and they're now discovering that those beliefs actually aren't true (enhancement of sexual pleasure) and the opposite may be the case.

There are occasionally medical reasons to perform one but those are not common.

It's an unnecessary practice albeit no where near as horrendous as female circumcision.

Permalink Reply by The Secular One on September 20, 2009 at 4:13pm

Assault, child abuse, so many wonderful crimes from this religious practice.

Permalink Reply by Mike Kleinman on September 20, 2009 at 4:35pm

It's awful. What possible use could this have? I seriously can't see a reason - even a so-called "religious" one.

Permalink Reply by Emekan A'dem on September 20, 2009 at 4:59pm

General consensus among people who support FGM is that in order for a woman to remain chaste, her clitoris must be removed; this way, the source of her passions is gone and she won't go off cheating on her husband or losing her virginity before marriage, which instantly renders her non-marriage material in the first place. It's a brutal and inhumane form of gender control within a patriarchy. So ultimately, you get the stories of women who feel "honoured" and proud to have had their clitorises hacked off because it gives them social elevation; the non-cut are considered whores, dirty and, in rural towns, do not survive very long.

The risks associated with FGM are high and ominous; most girls aren't even lucky (if you can dare call it that) to undergo the procedure in a hospital with tools exclusively designed for that purpose.

Permalink Reply by Mike Kleinman on September 20, 2009 at 5:29pm

This is an insane practice/belief. Woo-hoo for religious nut-cases.

Permalink Reply by Louis on September 20, 2009 at 7:41pm

'Priest, people become happy when this is touched.'

'Cut it off.'

This is another one of those 'happiness is a sin' kind of practices that deserve disdain.

Also, do you have the original article link somewhere?

• ‹ Previous
• 1
• 2
• Next ›
• Page