A newly organized Atheist 'church' in Britain is capturing the imaginations of Atheists all over the world. It has entertained some 200 inquiries from throughout the world as to how additional branches of it might be established. The theme appears to be good without god. Of course this type of entity would make it more difficult for theists to have Atheist movements stereotyped as inherently immoral. It is my opinion that a great many people are rejecting Atheism because theists have in large part been successful at having it stereotyped as inherently immoral. Maybe this new 'church' is gaining popularity because people think they can defend it against assertions that it is inherently immoral. Per the article:
Britain's atheist church is barely three months old but it already has more "worshippers" than can fit into its services, while more than 200 non-believers worldwide have contacted organisers to ask how they can set up their own branch. Officially named The Sunday Assembly, the church was the brainchild of Pippa Evans and Sanderson Jones, two comedians who suspected there might be an appetite for atheist gatherings that borrowed a few aspects of religious worship...Jones reels off the locations of would-be atheist "vicars" who have asked to set up new branches. "Colombia, Bali, Mexico, Houston, Silicon Valley, Philadelphia, Ohio, Calgary, all across Britain, The Hague, Vienna... It's so ludicrously exciting that my head occasionally -- literally -- spins round."...The Sunday Assembly's central tenets are to "help often, live better and wonder more" -- themes that would not be out of keeping with the teachings of any major world religion. At last Sunday's service, which had a volunteering theme, songs included "Help" by the Beatles and "Holding Out For A Hero" by Bonnie Tyler.
http://news.discovery.com/human/life/atheist-church-set-to-go-globa...
Tags: Atheism, Good Without God, Humanism, Jubinsky, Secularism
Permalink Reply by Loren Miller on March 9, 2013 at 2:16pm Very groovy, except for one glaring item, to wit:
Can we please NOT call it a church?!?
Good point. It's real name doesn't involve the word, church. Per the article: Officially named The Sunday Assembly
Permalink Reply by Loren Miller on March 9, 2013 at 2:53pm I DIG the name, "Sunday Assembly," and if one shows up here in Cleveland, I might even go ... but anyone calling it a church stays after school!
Permalink Reply by Idaho Spud on March 9, 2013 at 3:54pm That was my first thought, although I did read it's official name later.
Permalink Reply by Napoleon Bonaparte on March 9, 2013 at 3:42pm I won't be getting out of bed on a cold wet Sunday morning to attend anything. I was never a church-goer and won't be attending this church either.
What's the big fucking deal about the fact there are no Gods. No supernatural dimension to the universe. Why can't we move on now.
The creators Evans and Jones now have to work out how to make some money from it all.
The creators Evans and Jones now have to work out how to make some money from it all.
Why wouldn't they be able to make money from member donations and sponsoring activities the way theist assemblies do?
Permalink Reply by Idaho Spud on March 9, 2013 at 3:55pm I like the singing as that was always my favorite part of church.
Permalink Reply by Dennis Michael Pennington on March 11, 2013 at 6:23am I would avoid this like a disease! Started by two comedians, it would be viewed as proof that atheism is really just "another religion." What part of "non-theist" is it that the world doesn't understand. Atheism is another religion just like a non-stamp collector is a hobbyist. The problem is that humans have a need to be bound together in some sort of unity. This is how many "churches" got started in the first place. All you need is someone who believes the Bible differently, and everybody does. Beliefs are like an anus. Everybody has one. I'm not against people banding together for support and discussion, but the words "church" and "atheist" should be avoided. The world would laugh at the fact of others belonging to "The Holy Church of The Non-Believer." Very ludicrous indeed!
It isn't calling itself a church. Take a closer look at the article. It says: "Officially named The Sunday Assembly". Standing for good does not make one religious. Secular Humanists stand for good and are not religious. Are you saying Atheists should be afraid to unite in the name of humanity? In my opinion Atheism has not been very well received because too many Atheists are only Atheists because they are latently sociopathic and want the realm of Atheism to constitute a safe haven for their perspectives. Unfortunately, these types of the Atheists by example facilitate the attempt of theists to have all Atheists stereotyped as sociopathic. Very obviously, the Atheist movement needs less of them and more of the Secular Humanist type. I think The Sunday Assembly will serve well the very worthy objective of having Atheism move away from the sociopathic element and in the direction of the Secular Humanist one.
Permalink Reply by Tonya Wynn on March 12, 2013 at 4:07pm I Like the idea. But, 'Holding out for a Hero?' ...is this a joke about holding out for Jesus or Mohammed or Buddha? It would have to be more inter-active than a 'church' because most atheists aren't blind followers of anyone or anything. We know we have a right to an opinion and like to voice it freely. We do so in our 'church' in Atl., GA.
'Hero' means a good person to most people. It certainly isn't synonymous with 'god'. Webster says a hero is a man admired for courage. There are also women admired for courage (heroines). Many people are called heroes and heroines by society without the implication that they are gods. I don't find the words offensive. I think people who do should simply not bother with the Assembly.
Permalink Reply by Ruth Anthony-Gardner on March 12, 2013 at 5:55pm It's about time Atheists started taking community seriously. But isn't it a bit strange that stand up comedians got the ball rolling?
Tom Sarbeck replied to Tom Sarbeck's discussion Men have sex and women make love. Or do they? in the group Secular Sexuality
Debra Stevenson replied to Atheist Andrea's discussion Are you open about being an atheist or are you in the closet?
Debra Stevenson replied to Atheist Andrea's discussion Are you open about being an atheist or are you in the closet?
Debra Stevenson replied to James M. Martin's discussion Sorry for the Hype, But This Might Make You Laugh
Nerdlass replied to James M. Martin's discussion Sorry for the Hype, But This Might Make You Laugh
Debra Stevenson replied to James M. Martin's discussion Sorry for the Hype, But This Might Make You Laugh
Emma Lennon replied to James M. Martin's discussion Sorry for the Hype, But This Might Make You Laugh
Emma Lennon liked James M. Martin's discussion Sorry for the Hype, But This Might Make You Laugh© 2013 Atheist Nexus. All rights reserved. Admin: Richard Haynes.

