United Kingdom - Girls who join the Guides or Brownies may stop pledging their devotion to God after complaints that the practice discriminates against non-believers.  Whilst the Promise is optional, only girls who have taken it can be awarded the movement's highest badges.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/religion/8901378/Girl-guides-set-to...

 

Views: 50

Replies to This Discussion

I wonder if they will? If it took them a year to debate changing 'do my duty to god' to 'love my god' I doubt if they'll have the balls to drop the whole thing. I wonder, though, about the whole notion of asking children to take oaths whether they believe in god or not. I remember as a child (including being a brownie) being made to recite all sorts of stuff by schools and other organisations but I had no real conception of what taking an oath actually meant. To me, it was just a ritual chant.

Yes, Sandy.  Reflecting upon group recitations, consider the U.S. Pledge of Allegiance:

Few Americans know that a socialist and an officer in the Nationalist movement, Francis Bellamy, drafted the Pledge of Allegiance.  Also a preacher, his sermons on “Jesus the Socialist” and “The Socialism of the Primitive Church” prompted congregations to chase him from the ministry.  Bellamy went on to work for Youth’s Companion, a national magazine.  In 1892, the magazine launched a campaign to sell American flags in the public schools. In an effort to increase sales, a flag ceremony was encouraged during upcoming Columbus Day celebrations. Bellamy’s original pledge was to be included as part of the celebrations:

“I pledge allegiance to my Flag and to the Republic for which it stands—one nation indivisible—with liberty and justice for all.”

In the early 1920s, “my Flag” was changed to “the Flag of the United States of America.” In 1954, the Knights of Columbus persuaded Congress to add “under God” to differentiate the United States from the godless Communists.

While the desire to sell flags gave rise to the Pledge, American nativists also wanted to impress the duties of American citizenship upon immigrant children in hopes of breaking any remaining bonds to their lands of origin.  And, with the Civil War still in recent memory, Northerners wanted to remind Southerners that the union was “indivisible.”

Historically and originally, the Pledge was not much more than a marketing tool and a slap in the face to recent immigrants and Americans living below the Mason-Dixon Line.  

Thomas Jefferson once reminded his countrymen that blind confidence in government “is everywhere the parent of despotism; free government is founded on jealousy and not in confidence.” Jealousy of liberty—in the face of government claims to power—is a civic virtue, and one that our nation’s founders urged us not to forget.

Yet, American school children mindlessly pledge obedience to a flag–the most visible symbol of governmental authority; while we should be teaching them about the American Revolution, the Constitution, and the Bill of Rights.

The ritual of schoolchildren and Americans saying the Pledge is unbecoming for a nation of free people.

Reference:  “Rethinking the Pledge of Allegiance”, William J. Watkins Jr., April 5, 2004

 

Interesting. I'd never thought about it before, but pledging allegiance to a flag is kind of weird. You might expect a pledge to compatriots, government or country - but a flag? Now I know why.

And I love to irony of the pledge being drafted by a socialist.

RSS

Support Atheist Nexus

Donate Today

Donate

 

Help Nexus When You Buy From Amazon

Amazon

 

Latest Activity

Loren Miller replied to jay H's discussion What the freakin hell is wrong with this country???
17 minutes ago
Michael Penn commented on nikki summers's blog post atheist billboard
33 minutes ago
Michael Penn replied to jay H's discussion What the freakin hell is wrong with this country???
38 minutes ago
John Jubinsky posted photos
46 minutes ago
Loren Miller commented on Loren Miller's blog post Is god good?
1 hour ago
Joan Denoo replied to Grinning Cat's discussion Greta Christina: Why Being Liberal Really Is Better Than Being Conservative in the group Politics, Economics, and Religion
4 hours ago
Tom Sarbeck replied to Grinning Cat's discussion Greta Christina: Why Being Liberal Really Is Better Than Being Conservative in the group Politics, Economics, and Religion
5 hours ago
Grinning Cat replied to Grinning Cat's discussion Greta Christina: Why Being Liberal Really Is Better Than Being Conservative in the group Politics, Economics, and Religion
5 hours ago
Luara replied to Daniel W's discussion Are same sex marriages more stable than so-called traditional marriages? in the group LGBTQI atheists, nontheists, and friends
5 hours ago
sk8eycat replied to Joan Denoo's discussion The Bible is not Great by Soren Sagan in the group ORIGINS: UNIVERSE, LIFE, HUMANKIND, AND DARWIN
5 hours ago
Joan Denoo replied to Grinning Cat's discussion Greta Christina on "Why Being Liberal Really Is Better Than Being Conservative" in the group Politics, Economics, and Religion
5 hours ago
Luara replied to Daniel W's discussion Are same sex marriages more stable than so-called traditional marriages? in the group LGBTQI atheists, nontheists, and friends
5 hours ago

© 2014   Atheist Nexus. All rights reserved. Admin: Richard Haynes.

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service