Don't ask, Don't Tell overturned: let the religious hysteria begin!

Yep: A federal court in Riverside, California, ruled Thursday that the military's "don't ask, don't tell" policy -- which bars gay men and lesbians from serving openly -- is unconstitutional.

DADT overturned

So, time for Pat Robertson to start screaming about how the US is now vulnerable to the Devil or whatever.

Views: 30

Replies to This Discussion

I thought it was pretty funny seeing the numbers when I got this alert from the Washington Post:

LOL! Very appropriate!
This won't be the last of it. There is always another word to overturn the last word. Not wanting to be a pessimist, but that seems to be how it goes.
ACTIVIST JUDGE! ACTIVIST JUDGE!
I may be a little behind the news here, but wasn't DADT already repealed by Congress this summer? Please don't tell me it is still a law!
Sorry, double post!
I believe they voted to include the repeal of DADT in the 2011 Defense Authorization Bill but not to overturn it on it's own.
Additional thought: I've not seen anything about Defense Directive 1332.14 being repealed, that being the article of the US Code of Military Justice directing that homosexuality is incompatible with military service and that gay soldiers should be removed from service, so my question is: does this now give the US armed forces a license to witch-hunt gay service members?
It's worth noting that the challenge to DADT was brought by the Log Cabin Republicans. This puts the Republican party in a quandry. Do they alienate their gay constituents or their fundie constituents. You can be sure that there are a bunch of people behind the scenes doing the math.
The republical party doesn't accept their Log Cabin group anyway. They don't care about alienating their gay constituents. The Log Cabin group is like the hated child who keeps coming back home.
Of course they will alienate 'their' gays, but to be a gay republican anyway is a sign of Stockholm syndrome, so it won't really matter.
The judicial reasoning is right that it is a huge restriction on free speech and expression, not just on saying "I'm gay" but also a lot of other related talk and even nonverbal, and that the secretiveness is not helpful to the military.

RSS

Support Atheist Nexus

Donate Today

Donate

 

Help Nexus When You Buy From Amazon

Amazon

AJY

 

Latest Activity

Luara replied to Scot Hinson's discussion Suicide ?!?
2 minutes ago
Luara commented on Amanda Ashcraft's blog post Ferguson: A Larger Dialog
5 minutes ago
Luara replied to Scot Hinson's discussion Suicide ?!?
8 minutes ago
Freethinker31 replied to James M. Martin's discussion It Doesn't Take Long for this Racist Missouri Lawman to Blast Anyone Different from a Middle-Aged White Male
8 minutes ago
James M. Martin replied to Steph S.'s discussion In what way are you still recovering from being brought up religious? in the group Recovering from Religion
10 minutes ago
Joan Denoo replied to Dr. Terence Meaden's discussion God said, “div D = ρ, div B = 0, curl E = - ðB/ðt, curl H = J + ðD/ðt,” and there was light. in the group Physicists
12 minutes ago
Idaho Spud replied to James M. Martin's discussion No, Everyone Knows You Are A Dangerous Lunatic: A Person Without God is Immoral, Sinful, Wicked, and Naughty
14 minutes ago
Idaho Spud replied to James M. Martin's discussion No, Everyone Knows You Are A Dangerous Lunatic: A Person Without God is Immoral, Sinful, Wicked, and Naughty
16 minutes ago
James M. Martin replied to sflmac's discussion God cured Doctor's Ebola disease.
19 minutes ago
Joan Denoo replied to Scot Hinson's discussion Suicide ?!?
20 minutes ago
Idaho Spud replied to Scot Hinson's discussion Suicide ?!?
22 minutes ago
James M. Martin replied to James M. Martin's discussion No, Everyone Knows You Are A Dangerous Lunatic: A Person Without God is Immoral, Sinful, Wicked, and Naughty
28 minutes ago

© 2014   Atheist Nexus. All rights reserved. Admin: Richard Haynes.

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service