The World's Largest Coalition of Nontheists and Nontheist Communities!

David Silverman vs. Fox News Panel

Thanks for the heads up, Keely. Interesting stuff.

0 members like this

Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by Joseph P on December 6, 2010 at 11:43pm

I love the head nod at 3:02. :-D

Permalink Reply by Michael Black on December 7, 2010 at 12:30am

David Silverman you're my hero! That has got to be the best spent $20K I have ever seen in advertizing!

Permalink Reply by Joseph P on December 7, 2010 at 12:47am

Yeah, no kidding. Outnumbered 4 to 1, on a hostile network, he did ridiculously well in the interview.

Permalink Reply by Stewart Tryster on December 7, 2010 at 5:30am

Yes, at last, somebody is saying the things that really need to be said and not letting himself be bulldozed the sheer weight of the opposition.

Permalink Reply by David on December 7, 2010 at 4:02am

Fox News, the new CBN.

Permalink Reply by Joseph P on December 7, 2010 at 5:54am

Oh, absolutely. They have been for more than a decade, from the start.

Permalink Reply by Kenneth Soares on December 7, 2010 at 7:08am

If fox has so much faith, why do they have a need to out number him 4 to 1. you would think if they has so much confidence that they would have an even number.

Permalink Reply by Joseph P on December 7, 2010 at 7:35am

Well, this is Fox and Friends, I think it was. They're kind of a mindless echo-chamber of talking heads to reinforce the faith of the network viewers. They come as a set of 4.

Permalink Reply by Nathan Hevenstone on December 7, 2010 at 10:24pm

Anyone willing to do a complete transcript? I don't have sound on the computer I'm using and won't be on a computer with sound for a long while...

Permalink Reply by Dan DuPree on December 8, 2010 at 8:54am

Faux does transcripts of many of their "interviews" within a day or two. I don't think we can count on them to transcript this one. I can't get streaming video at work so it was last night before I was able to watch it. He really did kick their collective arses. You could tell they were just really regurgitating the "party line" and had given little thought to the possible answers to their leading questions. I think he had studied their playbook.

Permalink Reply by Gold Guy on December 7, 2010 at 11:22pm