How Do We Make Moral Judgments? Insights from Psychological Science
Research suggests that moral judgments are often based on emotional reactions.
In some cases, however, we seem to be able to override these initial reactions.
Matthew Feinberg and colleagues hypothesized that this might be the result of reappraisal, a process by which we dampen the intensity of our emotions by focusing on an intellectual description of why we are experiencing the emotion.
Across several studies, participants read stories describing moral dilemmas involving behaviors participants would probably find disgusting. Participants who reappraised the scenarios logically were less likely to make intuition-based moral judgments. These findings suggest that although our emotional reactions elicit moral intuitions, these emotions can also be regulated.
"In this way," the researchers write, "we are both slave and master, with the capacity to be controlled by, but also shape, our emotion-laden judgmental processes." [emphasis mine]
Tags: moral judgments, reappraisal
Loren Miller replied to Loren Miller's discussion Latest Activity?
Loren Miller commented on Ruth Anthony-Gardner's group Hang With Friends
Debra Stevenson commented on Ruth Anthony-Gardner's group Hang With Friends
sk8eycat commented on Ruth Anthony-Gardner's group Hang With Friends
The Flying Atheist commented on Ruth Anthony-Gardner's group Hang With Friends© 2013 Atheist Nexus. All rights reserved. Admin: Richard Haynes.

