According to Kohlberg, the early stages of moral development center around fear of punishment. While we can certainly impose punishments for immoral behaviors without daddy in the sky, we cannot insure that every offender will be discovered. In fact, as every good sociopath knows, one can generally get away with dozens of immoral acts without detection. There IS no escape from the detection of daddy in the sky
Isn't it possible that prospective superstitious wrong doers on the low end of moral development might modify their behavior based on the belief that they cannot escape their punishment?
I bring it up, because a recently had a conversation with such a person, and it was clear that he only resisted immoral impulses because he feared punishment from daddy in the sky.
Tags:
Permalink Reply by Edward Teach on May 25, 2011 at 3:48pm
Permalink Reply by Gordon Spofford on July 6, 2011 at 7:15am
Permalink Reply by Will Faithless Sophia on May 25, 2011 at 7:39pm
Permalink Reply by Apeman Jim on July 9, 2011 at 9:41am i will bite.
I do not believe and am repulsed at many horrific actions. The believer thinks that the repulsion they feel towards violence and cruelty is instilled by the vicious sky daddy they worship.
Permalink Reply by Edward Teach on June 5, 2012 at 7:56am The 'sense" of right and wrong is not in born. It is a learned. That's why external litmuses must be applied to our moral "feelings."
Tom Sarbeck replied to Joan Denoo's discussion Christianity with and without reductio ad ridiculum fallacy in the group Politics, Economics, and Religion
G posted a status
Joan Denoo replied to Joan Denoo's discussion Christianity with and without reductio ad ridiculum fallacy in the group Politics, Economics, and Religion© 2013 Atheist Nexus. All rights reserved. Admin: Richard Haynes.

