Atheist Humor

This is the place to post that hilarious irreligious YouTube video, an irreverent, anti-religious cartoon, or other humorous bit of media. Posts that do not reflect an atheist/irreligious theme will be deleted. (Don't make me go Old Testament.)

Members: 2125
Latest Activity: 1 hour ago

Lewis Black: The Flintstones is not a documentary.

A slightly longer version of the clip that used to be here.

Discussion Forum

BBC Black books comeday recommendation

Started by Christopher Cosgrove. Last reply by rockytij on Friday. 1 Reply

Jesus, Rocky and Fellatio

Started by Richard Cahill. Last reply by The Devian on Thursday. 3 Replies

Jesus vs Jeezus

Started by Loren Miller. Last reply by LaSmirk Jun 17. 6 Replies

Comment Wall


You need to be a member of Atheist Humor to add comments!

Comment by David Sensei on August 14, 2010 at 6:48am

Comment by Joseph P on August 14, 2010 at 2:56am
Heh, yup. I love the watchmaker argument. Anytime theists try to move beyond, "You've got to have faith," it always ends so badly for them.
Comment by Joseph P on August 14, 2010 at 2:48am
Your first paragraph is correct but is only part of the IC argument.

And yeah, that's typical of lots of Creationists. Not only do they not understand Evolution, but they don't even understand their own damned argument. :-D

And think through your second paragraph for a second. If IC didn't state that the system couldn't evolve, it wouldn't be much of an argument against Evolution, would it? Heh heh heh. Wow, you know some suck-ass Creationists.
Comment by Joseph P on August 14, 2010 at 2:43am
Heh, dude, rework your argument a bit. You just said that you have no problem with irreducible-complexity existing, and then you explained why it doesn't exist. Make up your mind. :-D

Irreducible-complexity states that there are biological systems that exist whose parts have no function on their own, outside of the system. That's where it's complete bullshit. The parts always have a function, outside of the system, and they just take on a new function within the system.

That's the bit you're missing. You seem to be under the impression that irreducible-complexity allows for the pieces of the system performing other functions outside of the system. It doesn't ... which is why it's bullshit. When they declare something irreducibly-complex, they're saying that none of it does anything without all of it.
Comment by Joseph P on August 14, 2010 at 2:27am
Heh, yeah. Reminds me of Behe's argument for irreducible-complexity of the bacterial flagellum. "Well, I haven't read anything that explains how it could have evolved, so it's impossible."

"Have you read any of these 28 papers on the subject?"

"Why would I do that?"
Comment by Joseph P on August 14, 2010 at 2:19am
Uhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh. Really?

I mean ... really?
Comment by Joseph P on August 14, 2010 at 2:11am
How does the Cambrian Explosion get used by ID? I've never heard that one before. Are they saying that's where God intervened or something?

That's even more stupid that their other arguments, if that's the case.
Comment by Andrew Hall on August 13, 2010 at 8:50pm
My thoughts on the Ground Zero Mosque - it's funny!
Comment by Glenn Sogge on August 13, 2010 at 7:45pm
I didn't make this, just found it while surfing. I'm sure we could come up with improvements.
Comment by MaleficVTwin on August 13, 2010 at 7:43pm
You missed a few, Glenn. A Christian friend of mine lumped evolution together with cosmology, geology, and abiogenesis, and for good measure said that Dawkins loses all of his debates. Yeah, I facepalmed too.

Members (2125)


Support Atheist Nexus

Donate Today



Help Nexus When You Buy From Amazon




© 2014   Atheist Nexus. All rights reserved. Admin: Richard Haynes.

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service