Information

Atheist Humor

This is the place to post that hilarious irreligious YouTube video, an irreverent, anti-religious cartoon, or other humorous bit of media. Posts that do not reflect an atheist/irreligious theme will be deleted. (Don't make me go Old Testament.)

Members: 2126
Latest Activity: Jan 21

Lewis Black: The Flintstones is not a documentary.

A slightly longer version of the clip that used to be here. 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LGrlWOhtj3g

Discussion Forum

BBC Black books comeday recommendation

Started by Christopher Cosgrove. Last reply by rockytij Sep 19, 2014. 1 Reply

Jesus, Rocky and Fellatio

Started by Richard Cahill. Last reply by The Devian Sep 18, 2014. 3 Replies

Jesus vs Jeezus

Started by Loren Miller. Last reply by LaSmirk Jun 17, 2014. 6 Replies

Comment Wall

Comment

You need to be a member of Atheist Humor to add comments!

Comment by Christopher on August 14, 2010 at 7:47am
hehehe Speaking of which...

Comment by Christopher on August 14, 2010 at 7:44am
Thanks, Mike! I was diggin' the Latin version. I have an all time favorite, so far, quote on the evolution "debate", LOL, which I got from a guy who used to frequent the GodIsAMyth chats on AOL back in the day.
"Geology shows that fossils are of different ages. Paleontology shows a fossil sequence, the list of species represented changes through time. Taxonomy shows biological relationships among
species. Evolution is the explanation that threads it all together. Creationism is the practice of squeezing one's eyes shut and wailing 'does not!'"
..........Dr.Pepper@f241.n103.zl.fidonet.org

I still start chuckling, even after all these years, every time I read that one. It's still funny as hell
Comment by David Sensei on August 14, 2010 at 6:53am
Cracked Carravaggio strikes again. Sorry I can't provide a larger image, you'll have to use a zoom function to read it, or drag it to your desktop. I'm still feeling my way with graphics applications. I'm on a roll with these so look out for more.
Comment by David Sensei on August 14, 2010 at 6:48am

Comment by Joseph P on August 14, 2010 at 2:56am
Heh, yup. I love the watchmaker argument. Anytime theists try to move beyond, "You've got to have faith," it always ends so badly for them.
Comment by Joseph P on August 14, 2010 at 2:48am
Your first paragraph is correct but is only part of the IC argument.

And yeah, that's typical of lots of Creationists. Not only do they not understand Evolution, but they don't even understand their own damned argument. :-D

And think through your second paragraph for a second. If IC didn't state that the system couldn't evolve, it wouldn't be much of an argument against Evolution, would it? Heh heh heh. Wow, you know some suck-ass Creationists.
Comment by Joseph P on August 14, 2010 at 2:43am
Heh, dude, rework your argument a bit. You just said that you have no problem with irreducible-complexity existing, and then you explained why it doesn't exist. Make up your mind. :-D

Irreducible-complexity states that there are biological systems that exist whose parts have no function on their own, outside of the system. That's where it's complete bullshit. The parts always have a function, outside of the system, and they just take on a new function within the system.

That's the bit you're missing. You seem to be under the impression that irreducible-complexity allows for the pieces of the system performing other functions outside of the system. It doesn't ... which is why it's bullshit. When they declare something irreducibly-complex, they're saying that none of it does anything without all of it.
Comment by Joseph P on August 14, 2010 at 2:27am
Heh, yeah. Reminds me of Behe's argument for irreducible-complexity of the bacterial flagellum. "Well, I haven't read anything that explains how it could have evolved, so it's impossible."

"Have you read any of these 28 papers on the subject?"

"Why would I do that?"
Comment by Joseph P on August 14, 2010 at 2:19am
Uhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh. Really?

I mean ... really?
Comment by Joseph P on August 14, 2010 at 2:11am
How does the Cambrian Explosion get used by ID? I've never heard that one before. Are they saying that's where God intervened or something?

That's even more stupid that their other arguments, if that's the case.
 

Members (2123)

 
 
 

Support Atheist Nexus

Donate Today

Donate

 

Help Nexus When You Buy From Amazon

Amazon

Nexus on Social Media:

© 2015   Atheist Nexus. All rights reserved. Admin: Richard Haynes.

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service