Fifty years ago, Richard Matheson wrote a piece entitled, “Steel,” for the television series, The Twilight Zone. It tells the story of manager and ex-boxer Sam “Steel” Kelly, played by Lee Marvin, who handles a washed-up B-2 robot boxer named Battling Maxo. Maxo needs parts badly to continue fighting, and indeed, the robot is in no condition to match up in the next contest it is scheduled for. Kelly knows this all too well, but the fight game is in his blood and his heart. He could no more quit than stop breathing, nor will he. Instead, he will mask himself with enough of his mechanical combatant as he can and go into the ring himself. No surprise, he is beaten badly, but the appearance fee for the fight will pay for trigger springs and oil paste, maybe just enough to get Battling Maxo working and fighting again. This was a memorable episode, one of the best The Twilight Zone ever produced.
Fast forward half a century and we find the movie, Real Steel, based on the same Matheson story. The names have changed; Hugh Jackman is boxing manager Charlie Kenton and there are additional plot points and back story, which include Charlie’s checkered past and an abandoned and forgotten son. Also, the automatons who fight now are huge metal behemoths that no man could survive in a ring encounter. Charlie has leveraged the rediscovery of his son in order to get enough scratch to get back in the fight game after his last robot was trashed … by a bull! His new acquisition looks promising, but mostly owing to Charlie’s less-than-thoughtful management style, gets reduced to spare parts. Crawling back from that loss, Charlie and his son stumble onto a sparring robot – “Atom” – with a surprising feature: the ability to perfectly mimic or “shadow” the movements of another. This ability is first used as pre-fight entertainment, but later comes into critical usage in a fight which seems like mechanized recreation of the first Rocky Balboa – Apollo Creed brawl. After a fashion, Charlie Kenton is almost as much in the ring as Lee Marvin was 50 years before him.
Ultimately, Real Steel is not enough grit, too much feel-good and too much Disney for me, and I have a tough time recommending as is. However, it at least tries to maintain some fidelity to the original idea Richard Matheson penned for Rod Serling’s classic series. Whoever came up with the idea of the “shadow” function deserves a tip of the cap, along with the idea that robot fighters had gotten away from human pugilistic techniques. This oversight leaves an opening as blatant as not keeping up your left, an opening filled by the combination of Charlie Kenton’s boxing savvy and Atom’s mimicry.
Real Steel doesn’t quite work for me … but a little tweaking and maybe it could have.
Tags: Real Steel, Richard Matheson, Twilight Zone
Permalink Reply by Marc Draco on April 21, 2012 at 2:35pm Completely agree. Too much Hannah Montanna and not enough Tarantino.
Permalink Reply by Loren Miller on April 21, 2012 at 2:40pm I don't know about Tarantino (Kill Bill was fun, but I don't think that attitude would work here). What was really needed was a bit more of the dark flavor of the original Twilight Zone episode. Predictably, the worst part of it was the kid. He was WAY too cocky for being out of his element, but again, that's Disney for you.
According to IMDB.com, a sequel's in the works. It'd be nice if they could bring a bit more real world to Real Steel, but I'm not taking any bets.

Richard Haynes Online



Merelen Online

Idaho Spud Online

Etienne Online
Posted by Debra Stevenson on May 21, 2013 at 2:37pm 0 Comments 0 Likes
There is a video of the Pope's 'exorcism' caught on film. The man isn't demon possessed, there are likely no 'real' demons. He's just delusional and doesn't want to accept personal responsiblity for his own behavior for his own dysfunctional life.
Brandi Amari Williams
Posted by Debra Stevenson on May 21, 2013 at 2:28pm 2 Comments 1 Like
There is an ad that reads ' Do you support 'traditional' marriage? Vote Now"! .
No, I don't support 'traditional' marriage because there is no such thing. I support heterosexual and same-sex couples marry each other legally , yes. 'Traditional' marriage promoters largely do not believe that heterosexual women are co-equal to their husbands. Their only purpose in 'traditional' marriage is to sexually satisfy their husbands if they can and raise children and do all…
ContinuePosted by matthew greenberg on May 21, 2013 at 12:18pm 6 Comments 0 Likes
i've got no problem with everyone saying "merry christmas" on christmas day. however, they've turned it into an entire holiday season where it lasts a month or more. in those situations it should be perfectly acceptable to say "happy holidays" or call it a…
ContinuePosted by Two Cult Survivor on May 21, 2013 at 11:30am 0 Comments 0 Likes
I posted the bulk of this on another thread, but wanted to add some context separately.
I finally confronted my faith and embraced the fact of my atheism late last August, 2012. Days after I revealed my "epiphany" to a few friends who knew me from another message board, my sister died from Lou Gehrig's Disease (which pissed her off because she hated catching a disease from someone she never f---ed).
THAT was my sister, understand? She was a beautiful, life-loving, potty-mouthed…
Continue© 2013 Atheist Nexus. All rights reserved. Admin: Richard Haynes.