Atheism & the Law

Legal issues involving atheism, agnosticism, and freethinking, including discussion of the constitutionality of laws or policies that violate the 1st Amendment, how atheism affects marriage and divorce, and anything else of a legal nature.

Members: 41
Latest Activity: Dec 15

Discussion Forum

Seven States still Ban Atheists from Public Office

Started by Bertold Brautigan. Last reply by Bertold Brautigan Dec 8. 6 Replies


What I Learned in My Law School Seminar on Jurisprudence

Started by James M. Martin. Last reply by James M. Martin Oct 21. 3 Replies

My jurisprudence professor in law school was Jesuit-trained and metriculated in a succession of Roman Catholic institutions of higher learning. Few law students took the seminar, and some who signed…Continue

From the Dutch-Courage-Sometimes-Comes-From-No-Longer-Giving-A-Rat's Ass Department

Started by James M. Martin. Last reply by Grinning Cat Oct 14. 2 Replies

Fellow practitioners tell me I am crazy for speaking out as an atheist in the social media. If I felt genuinely challenged by these caveats I might respond: It is the patriotic duty of all Americans…Continue

Religion or Insanity?

Started by Bertold Brautigan. Last reply by Pat Oct 14. 2 Replies


Tags: insanity, religion

Comment Wall


You need to be a member of Atheism & the Law to add comments!

Comment by sk8eycat on December 15, 2014 at 6:12am

Are the various Washington DC Mall museums government property or private?  I have seen several YouTube videos of the USAF orchestra and choir playing and singing blatantly religious xmas songs there from the past 10 days.  ("Whose Child is THIS?"  Joseph's or the Wholly Goat's?) Can they do that? legally?

Comment by Napoleon Bonaparte on May 16, 2014 at 7:46am

When Atheists want to chill out they go to  the Nothing Channel !

Comment by Napoleon Bonaparte on October 15, 2013 at 2:19pm
Comment by James M. Martin on June 28, 2012 at 5:08pm
Those old scales of justice are coming slowly back into balance: if it doesn't entirely make up for Bush v. Gore and Citizens United, the AHA decision suggests that not all the Scalito crowd are knee-jerk conservatives. The surprising thing is that Roberts looked to the tax clause and not the commerce clause for constitutionality. The question now is, will the Right argue taxes are subject to repeal, so the mandate could be gutted by Congress.
Comment by James M. Martin on May 7, 2012 at 6:34pm

Thanks, Steph.  I blog here now and then.  I am becoming acutely aware of the role religion plays in our court system.

Comment by Steph S. on May 7, 2012 at 12:57am
Hi James! I just found your group here! Looks great! I can't wait to get caught up on the discussions.
Comment by James M. Martin on January 8, 2011 at 5:39pm
Well, now, let's say Percy Shelley had contested in court his being disowned by his religious father, wouldn't his atheism have become an issue?  I rather doubt the bench would allow in such evidence in this day and age, but we have a judge a couple of counties away who keeps a "God" slogan next to the American flag.  I think it references the commandment about bearing false witness.  As if we had to be religious to avoid that!  No, I think atheist issues will grow in importance in jurisprudence of the 21st century.  I hope it does.

Members (41)


Support Atheist Nexus

Donate Today



Help Nexus When You Buy From Amazon



© 2014   Atheist Nexus. All rights reserved. Admin: Richard Haynes.

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service