In a recent social gathering of atheists, there was discussion of the non-theistic things that churches provide for those who choose to associate with them. In the USA, the portfolio of "services" provided through churches continues to expand to include day care, preschool, primary school, women's social groups, programs for seniors, etc. etc. The discussion also included remarks about the President's recent executive order allow more mixing of taxpayer money, community services offered by churches, and religious discrimination. There was some discussion of the need for social support programs for disadvantaged people and about what kind of organization should provide them.

An elderly, active humanist woman in the group commented: "if we paid enough taxes, we would not need churches".

This has been stuck in my brain for a few weeks now. It leads me to ask some questions:

Do the majority of atheists hold to the idea that all social support and services should be offered by the government? That is to say, if there is any kind of need in the population, a government agency needs to be identified and assigned to meet that need.

Where does this philosophy originate?

What makes directors and employees of a government agency immune from discriminatory practices, inefficiency, lack of resources, incompetence, and cronyism that in effect make the agency useless to the population it is meant to serve?

How does a society ensure that the people employed by government agencies addressing social needs actually care about the people they are employed to serve?

If a government is expected to meet all the social needs of its citizens, does that make the government liable for outcomes that were theoretically preventable?

Comments...?

Tags: government, private, services, socialism

Views: 5

Replies to This Discussion

What was the gathering of atheists?  Was it a large discussion group?
Small group, informal social setting. The comment about taxes and need for churches was not discussed (it was "overlooked" at the time).

RSS

Support Atheist Nexus

Donate Today

Donate

 

Help Nexus When You Buy From Amazon

Amazon

 

Latest Activity

Frank Moorman posted a status
"Heading to Las Vegas this weekend and hope to see the Tree of Knowledge, decorated with book covers, posted by the LV Coalition of Reason."
19 minutes ago
Frank Moorman updated their profile
29 minutes ago
Frank Moorman posted a status
"I signed up here four years ago, but did not participate, what with life taking some interesting turns. So I'll try again."
37 minutes ago
Frank Moorman replied to scott martins's discussion IS EVERYBODY 100% POSITIVE THERE IS NO GOD?
44 minutes ago
Daniel W commented on Dyslexic's DOG's blog post Wendy Wright (Creationist) arguably the Dumbest Person I've Ever Seen on Youtube!
1 hour ago
Loren Miller commented on Dyslexic's DOG's blog post Wendy Wright (Creationist) arguably the Dumbest Person I've Ever Seen on Youtube!
1 hour ago
Daniel W commented on Dyslexic's DOG's blog post Wendy Wright (Creationist) arguably the Dumbest Person I've Ever Seen on Youtube!
1 hour ago
Daniel W replied to James M. Martin's discussion Austin City Council Candidate Uses "I'm Devout Christian, He's an Atheist" Graphic on Her Website
1 hour ago
Pat replied to James M. Martin's discussion Austin City Council Candidate Uses "I'm Devout Christian, He's an Atheist" Graphic on Her Website
2 hours ago
Michael Penn commented on Visvakarman Svetasvatara-Upanish's blog post Einstein on God, narrated by Richard Dawkins
2 hours ago
Michael Penn replied to Pat's discussion Hello Dalai.., Err, Goodbye Dalai
2 hours ago
Daniel W replied to Daniel W's discussion "Pope Francis played Huge Role in Cuba Deal"
2 hours ago

© 2014   Atheist Nexus. All rights reserved. Admin: Richard Haynes.

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service